NFL 2017 Season Week 6 Picks

Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!

These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2024 Season Week 12 Picks.

Eagles 28 @ Panthers 23
Final
Thu, 10/12/17 7:25pm


4 Picks - 33%	8 Picks - 67%

Eagles

Panthers

Packers 10 @ Vikings 23
Final
Sun, 10/15/17 12:00pm


10 Picks - 77%	3 Picks - 23%

Vikings

Packers

Lions 38 @ Saints 52
Final
Sun, 10/15/17 12:00pm


9 Picks - 69%	4 Picks - 31%

Lions

Bears 27 @ Ravens 24
final overtime
Sun, 10/15/17 12:00pm


0 Picks - 0%	13 Picks - 100%

Ravens

Dolphins 20 @ Falcons 17
Final
Sun, 10/15/17 12:00pm


0 Picks - 0%	13 Picks - 100%

Falcons

Browns 17 @ Texans 33
Final
Sun, 10/15/17 12:00pm


0 Picks - 0%	13 Picks - 100%

Texans

Patriots 24 @ Jets 17
Final
Sun, 10/15/17 12:00pm


12 Picks - 92%	1 Pick - 8%

Patriots

49ers 24 @ Commanders 26
Final
Sun, 10/15/17 12:00pm


0 Picks - 0%	13 Picks - 100%

Commanders

Buccaneers 33 @ Cardinals 38
Final
Sun, 10/15/17 3:05pm


10 Picks - 77%	3 Picks - 23%

Buccaneers

Rams 27 @ Jaguars 17
Final
Sun, 10/15/17 3:05pm


4 Picks - 31%	9 Picks - 69%

Rams

Jaguars

Chargers 17 @ Raiders 16
Final
Sun, 10/15/17 3:25pm


6 Picks - 43%	8 Picks - 57%

Chargers

Raiders

Chargers

Steelers 19 @ Chiefs 13
Final
Sun, 10/15/17 3:25pm


1 Pick - 7%	13 Picks - 93%

Chiefs

Giants 23 @ Broncos 10
Final
Sun, 10/15/17 7:30pm


0 Picks - 0%	14 Picks - 100%

Broncos

Colts 22 @ Titans 36
Final
Mon, 10/16/17 7:30pm


4 Picks - 29%	10 Picks - 71%

Titans

Week Record

8 - 6
0.571
First Place

7 - 7
0.500

5 - 9
0.357

Season Record

49 - 42
0.538

54 - 37
0.593

55 - 36
0.604

48 - 43
0.527

Scotttime Record

1878 - 1144
0.621

1812 - 1210
0.600

1872 - 1150
0.620

1888 - 1134
0.625

No-Pack-Vike Record

3376 - 1964
0.632

3291 - 2049
0.616

3398 - 1942
0.636

3292 - 2048
0.617

Lifetime Record

2555 - 1534
0.625

2423 - 1666
0.593

2542 - 1547
0.622

2547 - 1542
0.623

Other Nut Canner Picks

Scott

Panthers
Packers
Lions
Ravens
Falcons
Texans
Patriots
Commanders
Cardinals
Jaguars
Raiders
Chiefs
Broncos
Titans

Week:	5 - 9 0.357
Season:	50 - 41 0.549
Lifetime:	1880 - 1118 0.627

Alex

PHI @ CAR - No Pick
GB @ MIN - No Pick
DET @ NO - No Pick
CHI @ BAL - No Pick
MIA @ ATL - No Pick
CLE @ HOU - No Pick
NE @ NYJ - No Pick
SF @ WAS - No Pick
TB @ ARI - No Pick
LA @ JAC - No Pick
Chargers
Chiefs
Broncos
Colts

Week:	1 - 3 0.250
Season:	1 - 3 0.250
Lifetime:	1519 - 908 0.626

craig

PHI @ CAR - No Pick
Packers
Saints
Ravens
Falcons
Texans
Patriots
Commanders
Buccaneers
Rams
Raiders
Chiefs
Broncos
Colts

Week:	5 - 8 0.385
Season:	14 - 15 0.483
Lifetime:	1337 - 878 0.604

jumbo12

Panthers
Packers
Saints
Ravens
Falcons
Texans
Patriots
Commanders
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Chargers
Chiefs
Broncos
Titans

Week:	6 - 8 0.429
Season:	55 - 36 0.604
Lifetime:	920 - 600 0.605

skulman

Panthers
Packers
Saints
Ravens
Falcons
Texans
Patriots
Commanders
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Raiders
Chiefs
Broncos
Titans

Week:	5 - 9 0.357
Season:	47 - 44 0.516
Lifetime:	890 - 553 0.617

JDUB316

Eagles
Packers
Lions
Ravens
Falcons
Texans
Patriots
Commanders
Cardinals
Jaguars
Chargers
Chiefs
Broncos
Colts

Week:	6 - 8 0.429
Season:	53 - 38 0.582
Lifetime:	1264 - 811 0.609

lynnelmore

Eagles
Packers
Lions
Ravens
Falcons
Texans
Jets
Commanders
Cardinals
Jaguars
Raiders
Chiefs
Broncos
Titans

Week:	5 - 9 0.357
Season:	49 - 42 0.538
Lifetime:	1298 - 716 0.644

Trampas

Panthers
Packers
Saints
Ravens
Falcons
Texans
Patriots
Commanders
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Chargers
Chiefs
Broncos
Titans

Week:	6 - 8 0.429
Season:	51 - 40 0.560
Lifetime:	1246 - 701 0.640

BigX2daG

Panthers
Packers
Lions
Ravens
Falcons
Texans
Patriots
Commanders
Buccaneers
Jaguars
Raiders
Steelers
Broncos
Colts

Week:	4 - 10 0.286
Season:	52 - 38 0.578
Lifetime:	557 - 330 0.628

princessjo

Panthers
Packers
Lions
Ravens
Falcons
Texans
Patriots
Commanders
Buccaneers
Rams
Raiders
Chiefs
Broncos
Titans

Week:	5 - 9 0.357
Season:	38 - 40 0.487
Lifetime:	38 - 40 0.487

Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!

Eagles 28 @ Panthers 23

	Sarah Advantage home team? Here's hoping though that Cam gets booed out of his own stadium.
	Jon Oh wow football on a Thursday, just what everyone wants.

Packers 10 @ Vikings 23

	Sarah Yay one of the 2 days of the year (3 if playoffs) where my husband doesn't really like me....
	Jon Vikings defense is good enough.

Giants 23 @ Broncos 10

	Sarah Giants are terrible and were dealt some bad injury blows. Anyone wanna buy an Odell Beckham Jr jersey cheap?
	Jon Manning vs. Manning!

Colts 22 @ Titans 36

	Sarah Titans need Mariotta back but Colts are terrible. Boo anything Indiana.
	Jon Bahahaha
	Jeremy It will be fun to watch these 2 up and coming franchise QBs face off.

	Sarah - 4671 Posts 10/12/2017 @ 11:51:37 AM
Picks Bump!		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Alex - 3619 Posts 10/15/2017 @ 03:06:56 PM
lame		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - 9543 Posts 10/16/2017 @ 10:02:41 AM
What are the odds the Packers add Kap? (I know, I know, it has to come up every QB injury) On one hand I think at this point he doesn't have a job because there's not enough time to do a ton of good for anyone. On the other the Packers' don't need to look at it from a savior POV like other teams would, they kind of need a another body in there. If you're bothering with that, it may as well be the guy that at least has the potential for some surprise upside, right? Like, you know what you're getting with Shaun Hill or Christian Ponder.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.
Jeremy messed with this at 10/16/2017 10:04:26 am

	Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it. 10/16/2017 @ 11:26:42 AM
Here are my thoughts (with thought process included) on the packers QB situation as it relates to Kaepernick: 1) Hundley looked sloppy, but he also hasn't played in a regular season game with any consequence in his career. Couple that with being thrown in against a pretty solid defense with an offensive line that was down to their 8th guy on the depth chart, and guards playing tackle, and it probably wasn't the best of situations for him. He did make some good throws, though, so I don't think he's an illegitimate option. Give the Packers a week or two to write up a game plan for him and a game where 4 O-lineman don't fall mid-game and maybe he could show some brilliance here and there. I know preseason is preseason, but this year anyway Hundley played extensively against the opponents' number 1s and performed decently. 2) Hundley on appearances is a pocket passer, which doesn't bode well with the current state of the Packers O-line. They have so many significant injuries on the O-line that to have any success, any QB for the packers right now needs to be able to move, whether that means roll out passing, throwing on the run, or straight up scrambling. Therein lies the window for a guy like Kaepernick. A certain part of me says scrap the traditional game plan, look for a guy that just make something happen someway, and see what happens. That type of game plan would seem to fit the skill set of Kaep. The Packers have a decent enough receiving corpse, so any QB would have some help in that regard. 3) on the other hand, Kaep was 1-10 last year in the 11 games he played. I know the 49ers have been pretty terrible the last couple of years, and that shouldn't all be laid on the shoulders of Kaep, but some of it probably should be. Maybe his skill set of mad scrambling with a decent arm just didn't last very long. Back to number 2, it would essentially require a total rewrite of the Packers offensive approach, as he simply is not the type of QB that Packers are built around.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.
Scott screwed with this at 10/16/2017 11:27:26 am

	Jeremy - Pie Racist 10/16/2017 @ 01:02:22 PM
1) I think he did ok. I'm not even sure if he played "sloppy", just that yeah if your benchmark as a fan is Farve to Rodgers, everyone else is going to look shaky. The other side of the "gameplan" coin is that the Vikings didn't gameplan Hundley either, so some of that cancels out, especially as there's more and more tape of him. 2) >The Packers have a decent enough receiving corpse Jordy might have been mostly handled by Waynes all game, but he's not that bad, is he? But all kidding aside....and without trying to sound like a kick-when-downer, do they though? That's the thing with having a guy like Rodgers; how much has he been masking this whole time? 3) He also had some pretty bad injuries that meant he couldn't work out. Usually when guys have leg injuries they add 30 pounds to their bench press, or something. Kap couldn't do anything and wasted away to a shell of his former self. If that's back, who knows? I guess I look at it the same way I did when the Vikings were scrambling to replace Teddy, what's your ceiling with Christian Ponder? Shaun Hill? 7-9? 8-8? I mean there's not really going to be a savior out there without giving up a lot. There's a reason a year later it's the same basic set of names. Conversely what's the floor with Shaun Hill? 6-10? You know what you're getting with a lot of these guys. They'll keep the wheels on, but there's not a lot of 35 second comeback drives either. With Kap it's different. It might be a total disaster or sky's the limit. So he might go 0-fer or lead you to the playoffs. The thing is there's no effective difference between 8-8 and 4-12, barring once-a-decade total divisional collapse. If anything there's some "if we're not going to be good we may as well totally suck" aspect to things. So IMO you may as well roll the dice.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.
Jeremy messed with this 2 times, last at 10/16/2017 1:04:57 pm

	Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings 10/16/2017 @ 01:24:48 PM
Sloppy probably came off as too harsh. Perhaps just unprepared (or simply unaware) for how poor the packers o-line is at the moment. When you go from Rodgers to anyone, you have an idea in your mind that a guy should just know to get the ball out quickly, or to scramble immediately. That being said, sloppy or not, Hundley made some good throws, so I don't get the impression that they Packers are going to go 0-10 the rest of the way through. Regarding their receiving corps (not dead bodies...Freudian slip, perhaps), I said "decent enough", not "spectacular and out of this world." Slightly above average? Better than most, worse than some? Better than the current state of the NY Giants? I think decent enough leaves room for the receiving corps not being great but also not being a liability. They were tested in 2013 when Rodgers went down, but then their backup qb situation was significantly worse that year. They brought Matt Flynn back midseason, but until then they were going with guys who had only been with the Packers for less than a year, one who had never even made into a game before taking over for 3 games. So I think their "decent enough" receiving corpse will help a guy who is likely a better QB than the last time the Packers were in this situation. Now, the thing is, the Packers might be genuinely confident with Hundley where they genuinely are not interested or feel the need to bring someone in to totally redo their offensive scheme. Kaep would be rolling the dice, that's for sure. While I can't say I disagree with your analysis of the floor/ceiling aspect, I can't say I'd be too upset if at all if the Packers played it out with Hundley at the helm. If he throws 9 INTs in the next 3 games, I might change my mind. Otherwise, might as well see what they've got in him and see if playing behind Rodgers for 2 full seasons rubbed off the way most people thing Favre rubbed off on Rodgers. Within the Packers system, he's certainly more of a known commodity and it might be easier to gameplan for a guy when you know first hand his strengths and weaknesses. That being said, there is no magic bullet for this.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 10/16/2017 @ 01:33:30 PM
Based on Rodgers' collar bone breakage in 2013, I predict (very non-medically, as I have no idea how bad the break is), that Rodgers makes it back in time for the December 23rd game against the Vikings. I bet the Packers can go 4-4 in that stretch (wins vs New Orleans, Detroit, and Tampa Bay, and at Cleveland...possibly a win at Chicago), putting than at 8-6 with the division still within reach.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - 9543 Posts 10/16/2017 @ 01:39:19 PM
I guess on some level the conversation of who to bring in doesn't even have to imply "to put Hundley back on the bench a or 2 week later". At some point you just want another body in there you could count on to maybe beat the Bears if it came to it, even if they aren't the starter. Almost all the guys you could kick around would be an upgrade over a guy fresh off the practice squad, they're just ineligible to be stashed there.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.
Jeremy screwed with this at 10/16/2017 1:40:55 pm

	Jeremy - 9543 Posts 10/16/2017 @ 01:44:35 PM
Scott Wrote - Today @ 01:33:30 PM Based on Rodgers' collar bone breakage in 2013, I predict (very non-medically, as I have no idea how bad the break is), that Rodgers makes it back in time for the December 23rd game against the Vikings. I bet the Packers can go 4-4 in that stretch (wins vs New Orleans, Detroit, and Tampa Bay, and at Cleveland...possibly a win at Chicago), putting than at 8-6 with the division still within reach. Oh, that's practically carved into stone. I was only 90% sure even yesterday that with 3 minutes left in the game we wouldn't hear Aikman go "What's that sound? Oh my god! It's Aaron Rodgers' music!" only to have him come out of the tunnel and drop 21. Maybe he hit Barr with a metal folding chair on the sidelines and that's how he got into the concussion protocol.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.
Jeremy perfected this at 10/16/2017 1:45:26 pm

	Scott - 6225 Posts 10/16/2017 @ 02:25:18 PM
Jeremy Wrote - Today @ 01:39:19 PM I guess on some level the conversation of who to bring in doesn't even have to imply "to put Hundley back on the bench a or 2 week later". At some point you just want another body in there you could count on to maybe beat the Bears if it came to it, even if they aren't the starter. Almost all the guys you could kick around would be an upgrade over a guy fresh off the practice squad, they're just ineligible to be stashed there. Agreed. They obviously have to bring someone in. they currently only have 2 QBs in their entire organization. They just today signed Joe Callahan off their practice squad. So at a minimum, they have to sign a guy to either add to their roster or fill their practice squad. If it's a guy to fill the practice squad opening, I'm pretty sure it isn't going to be any other than "just a body".		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 10/16/2017 @ 02:32:21 PM
Aaron Rodgers' Music https://youtu.be/J8Ly2zAoP7w *embedding the video isn't working.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.
Scott messed with this 5 times, last at 10/16/2017 2:34:54 pm

	Scott - 6225 Posts 10/16/2017 @ 03:16:54 PM
http://www.packersnews.com/story/sports/nfl/packers/2017/10/16/location-fracture-makes-aaron-rodgers-return-unlikely/769040001/ Apparently a collar bone breakage to the throwing shoulder side could take up to a month longer than the non-throwing side. Rodgers missed 7 weeks in 2013 to his non-throwing shoulder broken collar bone. This means that it could take 11 weeks or more, meaning he wouldn't be ready until midway through the playoffs.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - 4671 Posts 10/17/2017 @ 12:20:56 PM
Jeremy Wrote - Yesterday @ 01:02:22 PM 1) I think he did ok. I'm not even sure if he played "sloppy", just that yeah if your benchmark as a fan is Farve to Rodgers, Favre.		Rate this comment Yours: Total: Rated 2 times.

NFL 2017 Season Week 6 Picks

Eagles 28 @ Panthers 23

Sarah

Jon

Packers 10 @ Vikings 23

Sarah

Jon

Giants 23 @ Broncos 10

Sarah

Jon

Colts 22 @ Titans 36

Sarah

Jon

Jeremy