NFL 2013 Season Week 12 Picks
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2024 Season Week 16 Picks.
 |  |  |  | |||||
| Saints 17 @ Falcons 13 Final Thu, 11/21/13 7:25pm
|
Saints
 |
Saints
|
Saints
|
Saints
|
||||
| Jets 3 @ Ravens 19 Final Sun, 11/24/13 12:00pm
|
Ravens
 |
Ravens
|
Ravens
|
Ravens
|
||||
| Bears 21 @ Rams 42 Final Sun, 11/24/13 12:00pm
|
Bears
 |
Rams
 |
Bears
|
Bears
|
||||
| Panthers 20 @ Dolphins 16 Final Sun, 11/24/13 12:00pm
|
Panthers
 |
Panthers
|
Panthers
|
Panthers
|
||||
| Chargers 41 @ Chiefs 38 Final Sun, 11/24/13 12:00pm
|
Chiefs
 |
Chiefs
|
Chiefs
|
Chiefs
|
||||
| Jaguars 13 @ Texans 6 Final Sun, 11/24/13 12:00pm
|
Texans
 |
Texans
|
Texans
|
Texans
|
||||
| Vikings 26 @ Packers 26 final overtime Sun, 11/24/13 12:00pm
|
Packers
 |
Vikings
 |
Vikings
|
Packers
|
||||
| Buccaneers 24 @ Lions 21 Final Sun, 11/24/13 12:00pm
|
Lions
 |
Lions
|
Lions
|
Lions
|
||||
| Steelers 27 @ Browns 11 Final Sun, 11/24/13 12:00pm
|
Browns
 |
Steelers
 |
Browns
|
Browns
|
||||
| Colts 11 @ Cardinals 40 Final Sun, 11/24/13 3:05pm
|
Colts
 |
Colts
|
Colts
|
Colts
|
||||
| Titans 23 @ Raiders 19 Final Sun, 11/24/13 3:05pm
|
Raiders
 |
Titans
 |
Titans
|
Titans
|
||||
| Cowboys 24 @ Giants 21 Final Sun, 11/24/13 3:25pm
|
Cowboys
 |
Giants
 |
Cowboys
|
Giants
|
||||
| Broncos 31 @ Patriots 34 final overtime Sun, 11/24/13 7:30pm
|
Broncos
 |
Broncos
|
Broncos
|
Broncos
|
||||
| 49ers 27 @ Commanders 6 Final Mon, 11/25/13 7:40pm
|
49ers
 |
49ers
|
49ers
|
49ers
|
||||
| Week Record | 5 - 8 0.385  | 7 - 6 0.538 | 6 - 7 0.462 | 5 - 8 0.385 | ||||
| Season Record | 105 - 70 0.600 | 100 - 75 0.571 | 104 - 71 0.594 | 108 - 67 0.617 | ||||
| Scotttime Record | 1271 - 771 0.622 | 1228 - 814 0.601 | 1265 - 777 0.620 | 1292 - 750 0.633 | ||||
| No-Pack-Vike Record | 3419 - 1974 0.634 | 3333 - 2060 0.618 | 3437 - 1956 0.637 | 3336 - 2057 0.619 | ||||
| Lifetime Record | 1948 - 1161 0.627 | 1839 - 1270 0.592 | 1935 - 1174 0.622 | 1951 - 1158 0.627 |
Jets
Bears
Panthers
Chiefs
Texans
Packers
Lions
Browns
Colts
Raiders
Giants
Broncos
49ers
| Week: | 3 - 10 0.231 |
| Season: | 106 - 69 0.606 |
| Lifetime: | 1291 - 745 0.634 |
Ravens
Rams
Panthers
Chiefs
Texans
Packers
Lions
Steelers
Cardinals
Raiders
Cowboys
Broncos
49ers
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 120 - 55 0.686 |
| Lifetime: | 1275 - 765 0.625 |
Ravens
Bears
Panthers
Chiefs
Texans
Packers
Lions
Browns
Cardinals
Titans
Giants
Patriots
49ers
| Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
| Season: | 87 - 57 0.604 |
| Lifetime: | 1055 - 711 0.597 |
Ravens
Bears
Panthers
Chiefs
Texans
Packers
Lions
Steelers
Colts
Titans
Giants
Patriots
49ers
| Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
| Season: | 89 - 68 0.567 |
| Lifetime: | 531 - 341 0.609 |
Ravens
Bears
Dolphins
Chiefs
Texans
Packers
Lions
Steelers
Cardinals
Raiders
Cowboys
Broncos
49ers
| Week: | 6 - 7 0.462 |
| Season: | 48 - 37 0.565 |
| Lifetime: | 661 - 388 0.630 |
Ravens
Bears
Panthers
Chiefs
Texans
Packers
Buccaneers
Steelers
Colts
Raiders
Giants
Broncos
Commanders
| Week: | 5 - 8 0.385 |
| Season: | 55 - 44 0.556 |
| Lifetime: | 356 - 232 0.605 |
Ravens
Bears
Panthers
Chiefs
Texans
Vikings
Lions
Browns
Colts
Titans
Giants
Broncos
49ers
| Week: | 4 - 8 0.333 |
| Season: | 100 - 72 0.581 |
| Lifetime: | 723 - 455 0.614 |
Jets
Rams
Panthers
Chiefs
Texans
Packers
Lions
Steelers
Cardinals
Titans
Cowboys
Broncos
49ers
| Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
| Season: | 80 - 45 0.640 |
| Lifetime: | 612 - 364 0.627 |
Ravens
Bears
Dolphins
Chiefs
Texans
Packers
Lions
Steelers
Cardinals
Titans
Giants
Broncos
49ers
| Week: | 6 - 7 0.462 |
| Season: | 109 - 63 0.634 |
| Lifetime: | 742 - 379 0.662 |
Ravens
Bears
Panthers
Chiefs
Texans
Packers
Lions
Steelers
Colts
Raiders
Giants
Broncos
49ers
| Week: | 5 - 8 0.385 |
| Season: | 101 - 74 0.577 |
| Lifetime: | 541 - 338 0.616 |
Ravens
Bears
Panthers
Chiefs
Texans
Packers
Lions
Steelers
Colts
Raiders
Cowboys
Patriots
49ers
| Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
| Season: | 109 - 66 0.623 |
| Lifetime: | 624 - 351 0.640 |
Ravens
Bears
Panthers
Chiefs
Texans
Vikings
Lions
Steelers
Colts
Titans
Giants
Broncos
49ers
| Week: | 6 - 7 0.462 |
| Season: | 107 - 68 0.611 |
| Lifetime: | 542 - 329 0.622 |
Ravens
Bears
Panthers
Chiefs
Texans
Vikings
Lions
Steelers
Colts
Titans
Giants
Patriots
49ers
| Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
| Season: | 102 - 73 0.583 |
| Lifetime: | 535 - 294 0.645 |
Ravens
Bears
Panthers
Chiefs
Texans
Packers
Lions
Steelers
Colts
Titans
Giants
Broncos
49ers
| Week: | 5 - 7 0.417 |
| Season: | 88 - 69 0.560 |
| Lifetime: | 394 - 249 0.613 |
Ravens
Bears
Panthers
Chargers
Texans
Vikings
Lions
Steelers
Colts
Titans
Giants
Broncos
49ers
| Week: | 6 - 7 0.462 |
| Season: | 50 - 41 0.549 |
| Lifetime: | 50 - 41 0.549 |
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
| Vikings 26 @ Packers 26 | |
 | JonThis could be entertaining, I guess. |
 | JeremyThis is winnable, but we won't. Then again we did kind of hang around with the Seahawks until we decided to experiment with what would happen if we threw (almost) Back to Back to Back interceptions around the 20 yard line. Turns out it's about what one would expect, but now we know. |
 | SarahThis could be a very very bad game for all parties involved. |
| Broncos 31 @ Patriots 34 |  |
| JonI'm still not convinced the Broncos are as good as people think, but maybe that's splitting hairs because they're still probably the best team. But this will be a tough game. |
| JeremyIf I were the Pats I'd be pissed about the non call at the end of the game too. Like the "fail mary", even as far as "they never call PI there" goes, that was super obvious. To add insult to injury, the official right on top of the play threw the flag, and they picked it up. You have to wonder what the Carolina defender was thinking there. |
| 49ers 27 @ Commanders 6 |  |
| JonMr. Kaepernick goes to Washington. |
| JeremyThe Suddenly-Not-So-Hyped-Quarterback Bowl |
  | Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!! 11/19/2013 @ 10:05:56 PM |
 |
|---|---|---|
| is it fair to say that if the pack doesn't beat the vikings, we might be.... *gulp*... done? |
Yours:
 
Rated 0 times. |
|
  | Jeremy - Robots don't say 'ye' 11/19/2013 @ 10:18:45 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| You've barely lost any ground so far, so no, I doubt it. The Lions had a bye, played the Bears, which is kind of a wash either way, and then lost. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Scott - 6225 Posts 11/20/2013 @ 01:17:27 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| The Packers still hold the tie breaker (currently) over Detroit, having beaten them head-to-head. They probably can't afford to fall too far behind Chicago, though. If the Packers lose to the Vikings and the Bears beat the Rams, the Packers would more or less be 3 games behind the Bears. That being said, the Bears have lost to the Lions twice, meaning the Packers currently have a better divisional record (1 loss vs 2 losses). Basically, there is a lot that can happen in the final 6 weeks regardless of what happens this weekend. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Jeremy - 9563 Posts 11/20/2013 @ 05:12:20 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
If they lost to the Vikings, then the Lions, that might be hard to come back from, cause of the tie breaking/divisional implications, but just losing to the Vikings probably doesn't kill you. Even if you meant it as "man, if we can't beat the Vikings, who can we beat?" Rodgers will be back eventually. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Alex - Who controls the past now controls the future 11/20/2013 @ 09:00:59 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
This has their odds at 16% http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/playoffodds Most likely they need to go 5-1, unless both the Lions and Bears deedle their way to 9-7 and the Packers could somehow win the 3 way tiebreak. Going 5-1 will be a lot easier if they win this week. They have so many injuries that I'm almost thinking it would be best if they do lose. Then, because this season is a bust, just tell Rodgers to take his time instead of possibly coming back too soon. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 11/21/2013 @ 09:07:00 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jeremy Wrote - Yesterday @ 05:12:20 PM Even if you meant it as "man, if we can't beat the Vikings, who can we beat?" Rodgers will be back eventually. I heard people saying from the get-go that a collar bone injury can be the type of thing that may initially seem like "hey, this shouldn't be that long", and then turns out to be longer than originally thought. My physical therapist wife says that typically a collar bone would take about 8 weeks to heal, but she also notes that most injuries I ask her about take about half the time for an NFL player than it would for a normal human being. Also, it sounds like it is just a fracture (and not displaced), so that could make the healing process a little faster. That being said, I'm going to assume that Rodgers is done until at least week 16 if for no other reason than I can then accept the fact that this season is possibly in jeopardy already and not get too worked up by if they finish a game out of the division lead. All that being said, Scott Tolzien seems like he might have some potential. McCarthy said that other than the interceptions, Tolz hit "all his big throws" last week, and that he's never seen a QB hit every big throw they called for him to make. The fact that the packers weren't putting any points on the board and that he threw like 3 interceptions in the game probably made all that seem pointless, but even still, I wouldn't be shocked if Tolzien became their backup longterm, or ended up starting elsewhere someday. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 11/21/2013 @ 10:55:44 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Alex Wrote - Yesterday @ 09:00:59 PM This has their odds at 16% http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/playoffodds Most likely they need to go 5-1, unless both the Lions and Bears deedle their way to 9-7 and the Packers could somehow win the 3 way tiebreak. Going 5-1 will be a lot easier if they win this week. They have so many injuries that I'm almost thinking it would be best if they do lose. Then, because this season is a bust, just tell Rodgers to take his time instead of possibly coming back too soon. Or the Packers go 3-1 by the time Rodgers returns, and now he's nice and rested for the most epic Super Bowl run ever. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Jeremy - 9563 Posts 11/24/2013 @ 03:58:37 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| That was about the most "Vikings" finish to a game ever. Play too well for your own good to force the QB move. Lose the lead, get cute on offense when all you need is to hold the ball (still Patterson has to catch that, and probably the tipped td), and wind up with a tie. So that hurts the draft pick, only half hurts the Packers, and you didn't win. Blerg. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
| Jeremy edited this 2 times, last at 11/24/2013 4:01:26 pm | ||
|
| Alex - 3619 Posts 11/24/2013 @ 05:05:42 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jeremy Wrote - Today @ 03:58:37 PM get cute on offense when all you need is to hold the ball (still Patterson has to catch that, No "still" allowed, they absolutely should have just been running it every play at that point. And the Packers should not have even attempted to field the punt with 2 seconds left, and I think both QBs were legging out 5 yard runs when their teams needed 40 yds in 30s, etc. It's almost like both teams were trying for the tie. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Alex - Refactor Mercilessly 11/24/2013 @ 05:10:11 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| http://qz.com/150577/an-average-nfl-game-more-than-100-commercials-and-just-11-minutes-of-play/ |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Jeremy - Super Chocolate Bear 11/24/2013 @ 05:11:04 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Yeah, they always do that. They have all day to try for the big hitter, and they wait until a situation where they need to hold it, would really put themselves behind the 8 ball with the down/distance if they don't hit on it, and, arguably, wouldn't even want to get yards that quickly. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
| Jeremy edited this at 11/24/2013 5:11:46 pm | ||
Leave a Comment of your very own
| Name: | |||
| Comment: | |||
| |||
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.
Fetching Nutcan Content....
Saints 17 @ Falcons 13
Jon
As much acclaim has he's received, I still think Brees might get lost a bit in the Manning/Brady and even Rodgers greatness discussions. The guy has been great for a number of years now.Jeremy
F*@k the SaintsSarah
Drew Brees needs to be better.