NFL 2013 Season Week 11 Picks

Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!

These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2024 Season Week 16 Picks.

Colts 30 @ Titans 27
Final
Thu, 11/14/13 7:25pm


13 Picks - 81%	3 Picks - 19%

Colts

Falcons 28 @ Buccaneers 41
Final
Sun, 11/17/13 12:00pm


9 Picks - 56%	7 Picks - 44%

Falcons

Buccaneers

Falcons

Buccaneers

Lions 27 @ Steelers 37
Final
Sun, 11/17/13 12:00pm


14 Picks - 88%	2 Picks - 12%

Lions

Commanders 16 @ Eagles 24
Final
Sun, 11/17/13 12:00pm


2 Picks - 13%	14 Picks - 87%

Eagles

Chargers 16 @ Dolphins 20
Final
Sun, 11/17/13 12:00pm


11 Picks - 69%	5 Picks - 31%

Chargers

Dolphins

Cardinals 27 @ Jaguars 14
Final
Sun, 11/17/13 12:00pm


16 Picks - 100%	0 Picks - 0%

Cardinals

Raiders 28 @ Texans 23
Final
Sun, 11/17/13 12:00pm


3 Picks - 19%	13 Picks - 81%

Texans

Raiders

Browns 20 @ Bengals 41
Final
Sun, 11/17/13 12:00pm


0 Picks - 0%	16 Picks - 100%

Bengals

Ravens 20 @ Bears 23
final overtime
Sun, 11/17/13 12:00pm


3 Picks - 19%	13 Picks - 81%

Bears

Jets 14 @ Bills 37
Final
Sun, 11/17/13 12:00pm


11 Picks - 69%	5 Picks - 31%

Jets

Bills

Jets

49ers 20 @ Saints 23
Final
Sun, 11/17/13 3:25pm


1 Pick - 6%	16 Picks - 94%

Saints

Vikings 20 @ Seahawks 41
Final
Sun, 11/17/13 3:25pm


2 Picks - 12%	15 Picks - 88%

Seahawks

Vikings

Seahawks

Packers 13 @ Giants 27
Final
Sun, 11/17/13 3:25pm


4 Picks - 24%	13 Picks - 76%

Giants

Chiefs 17 @ Broncos 27
Final
Sun, 11/17/13 7:30pm


5 Picks - 29%	12 Picks - 71%

Broncos

Chiefs

Patriots 20 @ Panthers 24
Final
Mon, 11/18/13 7:40pm


10 Picks - 59%	7 Picks - 41%

Patriots

Panthers

Patriots

Panthers

Week Record

9 - 6
0.600

10 - 5
0.667

9 - 6
0.600

12 - 3
0.800
First Place

Season Record

100 - 62
0.617

93 - 69
0.574

98 - 64
0.605

103 - 59
0.636

Scotttime Record

1266 - 763
0.624

1221 - 808
0.602

1259 - 770
0.621

1287 - 742
0.634

No-Pack-Vike Record

3419 - 1974
0.634

3333 - 2060
0.618

3437 - 1956
0.637

3336 - 2057
0.619

Lifetime Record

1943 - 1153
0.628

1832 - 1264
0.592

1929 - 1167
0.623

1946 - 1150
0.629

Other Nut Canner Picks

Scott

Colts
Buccaneers
Lions
Eagles
Chargers
Cardinals
Raiders
Bengals
Bears
Jets
Saints
Seahawks
Giants
Broncos
Patriots

Week:	11 - 4 0.733
Season:	103 - 59 0.636
Lifetime:	1288 - 735 0.637

Alex

Colts
Falcons
Lions
Eagles
Chargers
Cardinals
Texans
Bengals
Bears
Bills
Saints
Seahawks
Packers
Broncos
Panthers

Week:	10 - 5 0.667
Season:	112 - 50 0.691
Lifetime:	1267 - 760 0.625

craig

Titans
Falcons
Steelers
Eagles
Chargers
Cardinals
Texans
Bengals
Bears
Jets
Saints
Seahawks
Packers
Chiefs
Panthers

Week:	8 - 7 0.533
Season:	80 - 51 0.611
Lifetime:	1048 - 705 0.598

skulman

Colts
Buccaneers
Lions
Commanders
Dolphins
Cardinals
Raiders
Bengals
Bears
Jets
Saints
Seahawks
Giants
Broncos
Patriots

Week:	11 - 4 0.733
Season:	50 - 36 0.581
Lifetime:	351 - 224 0.610

JDUB316

Colts
Falcons
Lions
Eagles
Chargers
Cardinals
Texans
Bengals
Bears
Jets
Saints
Seahawks
Giants
Chiefs
Patriots

Week:	8 - 7 0.533
Season:	96 - 64 0.600
Lifetime:	719 - 447 0.617

Jamey

Colts
Falcons
Lions
Eagles
Chargers
Cardinals
Texans
Bengals
Bears
Jets
Saints
Seahawks
Packers
Broncos
Panthers

Week:	9 - 6 0.600
Season:	72 - 40 0.643
Lifetime:	604 - 359 0.627

lynnelmore

Colts
Buccaneers
Lions
Eagles
Chargers
Cardinals
Texans
Bengals
Ravens
Jets
Saints
Seahawks
Giants
Broncos
Patriots

Week:	9 - 6 0.600
Season:	103 - 56 0.648
Lifetime:	736 - 372 0.664

mbaraclo

Colts
Buccaneers
Lions
Commanders
Chargers
Cardinals
Texans
Bengals
Bears
Jets
Saints
Seahawks
Giants
Broncos
Panthers

Week:	10 - 5 0.667
Season:	96 - 66 0.593
Lifetime:	536 - 330 0.619

Trampas

Colts
Buccaneers
Lions
Eagles
Chargers
Cardinals
Texans
Bengals
Ravens
Jets
Saints
Seahawks
Giants
Broncos
Patriots

Week:	9 - 6 0.600
Season:	102 - 60 0.630
Lifetime:	617 - 345 0.641

X2daG

Titans
Falcons
Lions
Eagles
Dolphins
Cardinals
Texans
Bengals
Ravens
Bills
49ers
Seahawks
Giants
Broncos
Patriots

Week:	8 - 7 0.533
Season:	101 - 61 0.624
Lifetime:	536 - 322 0.625

6timechamps

Colts
Falcons
Steelers
Eagles
Dolphins
Cardinals
Texans
Bengals
Bears
Bills
Saints
Seahawks
Giants
Chiefs
Panthers

Week:	12 - 3 0.800
Season:	95 - 67 0.586
Lifetime:	528 - 288 0.647

black_gold87

IND @ TEN - No Pick
ATL @ TB - No Pick
DET @ PIT - No Pick
WAS @ PHI - No Pick
LAC @ MIA - No Pick
ARI @ JAC - No Pick
LV @ HOU - No Pick
CLE @ CIN - No Pick
BAL @ CHI - No Pick
NYJ @ BUF - No Pick
Saints
Seahawks
Packers
Chiefs
Patriots

Week:	2 - 3 0.400
Season:	83 - 62 0.572
Lifetime:	389 - 242 0.617

Krystal23

Titans
Falcons
Lions
Eagles
Dolphins
Cardinals
Texans
Bengals
Bears
Bills
Saints
Seahawks
Giants
Broncos
Patriots

Week:	10 - 5 0.667
Season:	44 - 34 0.564
Lifetime:	44 - 34 0.564

Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!

Colts 30 @ Titans 27

Sarah

Colts got owned last week against the Rams. Titans lost to the most terrible team last week (Jaguars obvs). Thursday games are the bomb!

Vikings 20 @ Seahawks 41

	Jeremy Was there ever any doubt Harvin's return was going to be against the Vikings?
	Sarah Percy Harvin, meh.
	Jon NFC Championship preview?

Packers 13 @ Giants 27

	Jeremy Giants have won 3 in a row. Tolzien was fairly good, though he got away with some things that maybe he won't with defensive game planning. Then again, that effect will largely be offset by him getting some practice/game planning. Still, on the road, I think the Giants might capitalize.
	Sarah If the Packers win, that'll be fantastic, but I'm not going to hold my breath. Giants seem to always have the Packers number (Third Tynes a Charm), they've won 3 straight, our defense is turrible, I don't have high hopes for our QB, just pack it in.
	Jon Eli Manning goes for five touchdowns.

Chiefs 17 @ Broncos 27

Sarah

KC's D is something to behold (or so I've been told) but their schedule has been somewhat weak. It'll still be a good game and I'll be watching. Packers Giants getting flexed out of this spot was a good thing.

Patriots 20 @ Panthers 24

	Sarah Panthers and Cam Newton being what he could be. But Tom Brady is Tom Brady, tough match up.
	Jon How much confidence can you place in the Panthers? Compare that with the Patriots. I think we're supposed to be commenting on Broncos Chiefs also. Here's what you need to know about that one. People think the Chiefs haven't beaten anyone really good, which they haven't in a sense. But then again, neither have the Broncos.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/13/2013 @ 09:07:58 AM
Rumor: because he wanted to make sure his was presence was missed more, Aaron Rodgers secretly broke the collar bones of at least three of his defensive teammates.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jon - 3463 Posts 11/16/2013 @ 06:20:08 AM
Scott Wrote - 11/13/2013 @ 09:07:58 AM Rumor: because he wanted to make sure his was presence was missed more, Aaron Rodgers secretly broke the collar bones of at least three of his defensive teammates. Is that true? Is Gilbert Brown ok?		Rate this comment Yours: Total: Rated 1 times.

	Scott - On your mark...get set...Terrible! 11/16/2013 @ 01:23:05 PM
Is Gilbert Brown his teammate?		Rate this comment Yours: Total: Rated 1 times.

	Jeremy - Cube Phenomenoligist 11/18/2013 @ 12:46:13 PM
The Lions fake FG was bad, and a weird place to call it. Also, even if going for it, while I understand the "surprise" angle, you have Megatron, seems like your best chance is just to go for it go for it. Still, I wish people would stop talking about the fact that the Lions fumbled on the play as what did them in. It was 4th down, the Steelers had him well short. It was always going to be their ball. The fumble actually backed the Steeelers up a few yards at a field position where that space is critical than if he had hung onto it.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Alex - 3619 Posts 11/18/2013 @ 07:05:57 PM
On the Jason Pierre-Paul INT, shouldn't the offensive lineman be purposefully engaging the DE and not just let him stand there uninhibited?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - Always thinking of, but never about, the children. 11/19/2013 @ 04:55:00 PM
I'm guessing...probably? They drop back to pass protect. If they were told to "go get em" if they weren't coming the defensive end would probably use that against them. (As soon as you commit to running at me, I'm going around you.) Edit: One would kind of have to assume if the idea was the "offense engages the defense" then there wouldn't be much of a difference between run blocking and pass blocking.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.
Jeremy edited this at 11/19/2013 5:55:30 pm

	Scott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue. 11/19/2013 @ 05:58:25 PM
I always thought that on a quick slant to a tight end like what the Packers were running on that play that the o-line's responsibility was to cut the d-lineman down, or at least occupy him so he has to keep his hands down. That being said, JPP came out of his stance almost a full step after everyone else on the D and O-lines did after the snap (not sure if by design or because he was asleep). So the LT might have had the intention of doing that, but because JPP wasn't where he expected him to be when he dropped back into pass protection, he had no one to engage, and JPP was in the perfect spot to get in the way of a quick 2 step drop-slant to the TE. That's my two cents.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - I hate our freedoms 11/19/2013 @ 06:03:55 PM
Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if the tackle's job there is to not go "full on pass block" but just quickly engage to keep his hands down, but I doubt that includes "run out like a maniac at a defender staying back to play the quick slant."		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.
Jeremy screwed with this at 11/19/2013 6:04:12 pm

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/20/2013 @ 02:35:43 PM
regarding the call/non-call at the end of the Patriots-Panthers game: So often you hear people complaining about a ticky-tack call at the end of a game and they say something along the lines of "let the boys play" or "don't expect the refs to bail you out" or "the refs decided the outcome of the game". So now that the refs decided to NOT call a close play at the end of the game, and it seems like a lot of people (probably a lot of the same people) are calling foul for the the non-call. I almost guarantee that there would be as much controversy if the penalty was called instead of picked up. All that being said, I'm not sure what the correct call should have been. * - I will say this, though: the offensive pass interference was 100 times more obvious and aggregeous in the Fail Mary play than the contact and play made against Gronk.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.
Scott messed with this 2 times, last at 11/20/2013 2:40:43 pm

	Jon - infinity + 1 posts 11/21/2013 @ 06:51:40 PM
Scott Wrote - Yesterday @ 02:35:43 PM * - I will say this, though: the offensive pass interference was 100 times more obvious and aggregeous in the Fail Mary play than the contact and play made against Gronk. Seriously? This again? I'm sounding the Easy Stance Alert! No one argued that there wasn't blatant offensive pass interference on that play. Also, did anyone even compare the two plays until you just did, let alone the severity of the interference? Was this just to rile me up? Because it worked. Also, there should be a rule about this. Don't bring up the missed offensive pass interference call (or the play in general) without mentioning at least one of the obvious bad/missed calls the Packers benefited from in the fourth quarter alone of that Seahawks game. Seattle may never have needed to throw a hail mary pass if the refs made the correct calls in the first place.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/21/2013 @ 08:49:12 PM
It was brought up on the Dan Patrick show this week. That's what made me think to mention it.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.
Scott messed with this at 11/21/2013 8:49:22 pm

	Jeremy - 9563 Posts 11/22/2013 @ 01:40:38 AM
Jon Wrote - Yesterday @ 06:51:40 PM Scott Wrote - 11/20/2013 @ 02:35:43 PM * - I will say this, though: the offensive pass interference was 100 times more obvious and aggregeous in the Fail Mary play than the contact and play made against Gronk. Seriously? This again? I'm sounding the Easy Stance Alert! No one argued that there wasn't blatant offensive pass interference on that play. Also, did anyone even compare the two plays until you just did, let alone the severity of the interference? Was this just to rile me up? Because it worked. Also, there should be a rule about this. Don't bring up the missed offensive pass interference call (or the play in general) without mentioning at least one of the obvious bad/missed calls the Packers benefited from in the fourth quarter alone of that Seahawks game. Seattle may never have needed to throw a hail mary pass if the refs made the correct calls in the first place. Ha, I didn't think anything of it because I assumed it was in response to my game comment. Turns out it wasn't, as that was made on the next week.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.