NFL 2012 Season Week 17 Picks
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2024 Season Week 16 Picks.
 |  |  |  | |||||
| Dolphins 0 @ Patriots 28 Final Sun, 12/30/12 12:00pm
|
Patriots
 |
Patriots
|
Patriots
|
Patriots
|
||||
| Buccaneers 22 @ Falcons 17 Final Sun, 12/30/12 12:00pm
|
Falcons
 |
Falcons
|
Buccaneers
 |
Falcons
|
||||
| Panthers 44 @ Saints 38 Final Sun, 12/30/12 12:00pm
|
Saints
 |
Panthers
 |
Saints
|
Saints
|
||||
| Packers 34 @ Vikings 37 Final Sun, 12/30/12 12:00pm
|
Vikings
 |
Vikings
|
Vikings
|
Packers
 |
||||
| Bears 26 @ Lions 24 Final Sun, 12/30/12 12:00pm
|
Bears
 |
Lions
 |
Bears
|
Bears
|
||||
| Eagles 7 @ Giants 42 Final Sun, 12/30/12 12:00pm
|
Giants
 |
Eagles
 |
Giants
|
Giants
|
||||
| Cowboys 18 @ Commanders 28 Final Sun, 12/30/12 12:00pm
|
Commanders
 |
Commanders
|
Cowboys
 |
Commanders
|
||||
| Jaguars 20 @ Titans 38 Final Sun, 12/30/12 12:00pm
|
Titans
 |
Jaguars
 |
Titans
|
Titans
|
||||
| Texans 16 @ Colts 28 Final Sun, 12/30/12 12:00pm
|
Texans
 |
Texans
|
Texans
|
Colts
 |
||||
| Browns 10 @ Steelers 24 Final Sun, 12/30/12 12:00pm
|
Steelers
 |
Steelers
|
Steelers
|
Steelers
|
||||
| Ravens 17 @ Bengals 23 Final Sun, 12/30/12 12:00pm
|
Bengals
 |
Ravens
 |
Ravens
|
Bengals
|
||||
| Jets 9 @ Bills 28 Final Sun, 12/30/12 12:00pm
|
Bills
 |
Bills
|
Bills
|
Jets
 |
||||
| Raiders 21 @ Chargers 24 Final Sun, 12/30/12 3:15pm
|
Chargers
 |
Chargers
|
Chargers
|
Chargers
|
||||
| Chiefs 3 @ Broncos 38 Final Sun, 12/30/12 3:15pm
|
Broncos
 |
Broncos
|
Broncos
|
Broncos
|
||||
| Cardinals 13 @ 49ers 27 Final Sun, 12/30/12 3:15pm
|
49ers
 |
49ers
|
49ers
|
49ers
|
||||
| Rams 13 @ Seahawks 20 Final Sun, 12/30/12 3:15pm
|
Seahawks
 |
Seahawks
|
Seahawks
|
Seahawks
|
||||
| Week Record | 13 - 3 0.812  | 10 - 6 0.625  | 12 - 4 0.750  | 12 - 4 0.750 | ||||
| Season Record | 166 - 89 0.651 | 160 - 95 0.627 | 162 - 93 0.635 | 170 - 85 0.667 | ||||
| Scotttime Record | 1161 - 695 0.625 | 1121 - 735 0.604 | 1156 - 700 0.623 | 1181 - 675 0.636 | ||||
| No-Pack-Vike Record | 3419 - 1974 0.634 | 3333 - 2060 0.618 | 3437 - 1956 0.637 | 3336 - 2057 0.619 | ||||
| Lifetime Record | 1838 - 1085 0.629 | 1732 - 1191 0.593 | 1826 - 1097 0.625 | 1840 - 1083 0.629 |
Falcons
Saints
Packers
Bears
Giants
Commanders
Titans
Texans
Steelers
Ravens
Jets
Chargers
Broncos
49ers
Seahawks
| Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
| Season: | 168 - 86 0.661 |
| Lifetime: | 1178 - 672 0.637 |
Falcons
Saints
Packers
Bears
Giants
Commanders
Titans
Texans
Steelers
Bengals
Bills
Chargers
Broncos
49ers
Seahawks
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 162 - 93 0.635 |
| Lifetime: | 1150 - 704 0.620 |
Falcons
Saints
Packers
Bears
Eagles
Commanders
Titans
Texans
Steelers
Bengals
Bills
Chargers
Broncos
49ers
Seahawks
| Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Season: | 137 - 65 0.678 |
| Lifetime: | 442 - 273 0.618 |
Falcons
Saints
Packers
Bears
Giants
Commanders
Titans
Texans
Steelers
Bengals
Bills
Raiders
Broncos
49ers
Seahawks
| Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Season: | 150 - 103 0.593 |
| Lifetime: | 296 - 185 0.615 |
Falcons
Saints
Packers
Lions
Giants
Commanders
Titans
Texans
Steelers
Bengals
Bills
Chargers
Broncos
49ers
Seahawks
| Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Season: | 112 - 66 0.629 |
| Lifetime: | 529 - 318 0.625 |
Falcons
Saints
Packers
Bears
Giants
Commanders
Titans
Colts
Steelers
Bengals
Bills
Chargers
Broncos
49ers
Seahawks
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 170 - 68 0.714 |
| Lifetime: | 631 - 314 0.668 |
Falcons
Saints
Packers
Bears
Giants
Cowboys
Titans
Colts
Steelers
Bengals
Bills
Chargers
Broncos
49ers
Seahawks
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 164 - 85 0.659 |
| Lifetime: | 437 - 258 0.629 |
Falcons
Saints
Packers
Bears
Giants
Commanders
Titans
Texans
Steelers
Bengals
Bills
Chargers
Broncos
49ers
Seahawks
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 165 - 90 0.647 |
| Lifetime: | 509 - 280 0.645 |
Falcons
Panthers
Packers
Bears
Giants
Commanders
Jaguars
Colts
Steelers
Bengals
Jets
Chargers
Broncos
49ers
Seahawks
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 168 - 87 0.659 |
| Lifetime: | 432 - 254 0.630 |
Falcons
Panthers
Packers
Bears
Giants
Commanders
Titans
Texans
Steelers
Bengals
Bills
Chargers
Broncos
49ers
Seahawks
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 173 - 82 0.678 |
| Lifetime: | 426 - 217 0.662 |
Falcons
Panthers
Packers
Bears
Giants
Commanders
Titans
Texans
Steelers
Bengals
Bills
Chargers
Broncos
49ers
Seahawks
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 154 - 88 0.636 |
| Lifetime: | 298 - 178 0.626 |
Falcons
Panthers
Packers
Bears
Giants
Commanders
Titans
Texans
Browns
Ravens
Bills
Chargers
Broncos
49ers
Seahawks
| Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Season: | 166 - 89 0.651 |
| Lifetime: | 180 - 103 0.636 |
Falcons
Saints
Vikings
Lions
Giants
Commanders
Titans
Texans
Steelers
Bengals
Bills
Chargers
Broncos
49ers
Seahawks
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 120 - 88 0.577 |
| Lifetime: | 120 - 88 0.577 |
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
  | Sarah - So's your face 12/28/2012 @ 05:26:21 PM |
 |
|---|---|---|
| Woot! |
Yours:
 
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Scott - Resident Tech Support 12/30/2012 @ 07:33:22 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Regarding Jon's comment, I think it has just been within the last couple years that the NFL has backloaded the season with division games. I don't remember a time when it seemed as extreme as it has been this year for the Packers either. I too get the point, and it's most likely for ratings (the games at the end of the season have the perception of being more important, therefore lets make those games against teams that people want to see play against each other), but in reality, does that really make sense? Is a week 17 game really any more or less important than a week 4 game? They both are worth 1/16th of the total schedule. And should how you play at a certain point in the season really affect your playoff standings? Consider this, a team can play differently at different points of the season. Had the Packers played the Vikings between weeks 2-6 this year, the matchup might have been different since the Packers weren't looking so hot in some of those early games. Was that because they were playing better teams or because they were adjusting to injury, who knows. The point is when you back load games so that the Packers play the Lions and the Vikings both in a very short stretch of games, the Lions and the Vikings (and likewise the Packers in relation to those teams), aren't necessarily getting a good sample of how the Packers have played during the season. If the Packers play the Vikings twice only at the end of the season and are playing lights out (not specifically this year, necessarily), then the Vikings are sort of getting screwed, or at least unlucky. If they played the Packers in the first half and the second half, you are spacing out the likelihood that they are playing a team on a big hot streak. In other words, the backloaded divisional schedule assumes that a perception of late game importance is in fact reality, when in reality, that is only a perception by those that can't see the forest from the trees. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
  | Jon - 1 bajillion posts 12/31/2012 @ 02:33:40 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Wild NFL year, and yes, that's something that we could say every year. But really, what a rookie class. I know I'm not breaking news here, but wow. I mean, the Colts and Redskins and Seahawks are all peaking as they enter the playoffs and they all started rookie QBs the whole year. Barring some sort of tie, one of those guys (Luck, Griffin, Wilson) won't finish higher than 3rd in the Offensive ROY vote. They might finish 4th. Doug Martin is somewhat forgotten because of the quarterbacks, but he gained just under 2,000 yards from scrimmage. One of those four guys will be 4th in the voting. All of them had ROY caliber seasons. And then there's the whole comeback player award. Can anyone even remember another year's winner for that? And suddenly we have two all time great comeback stories. edit: Also, Alfred Morris. He had over 1600 yards rushing. Another season that could easily win the ROY award on a given year. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
| Jon edited this 3 times, last at 12/31/2012 2:48:42 am | ||
|
| Sarah - 4691 Posts 12/31/2012 @ 06:44:20 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| RGIII is the best rookie in the world, but he might not even be the best rookie on his team! Purple drank! Or something like that.... |
Yours:
Total:  Rated 1 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 12/31/2012 @ 08:44:19 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| The Packers are currently 10 point favorites for Saturday's game. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings 12/31/2012 @ 08:54:49 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jon Wrote - Today @ 02:33:40 AM And then there's the whole comeback player award. Can anyone even remember another year's winner for that? And suddenly we have two all time great comeback stories. Chad Pennington won it twice. If that's not hall of fame worthy, I don't know what is. It would be hard to argue with either Peyton Manning or Adrian Peterson this year. Both came back from devastating injuries to have mvp type seasons. One injury is your run of the mill knee injury that seems to happen to a dozen guys a year. The other was so scary and iffy there was a question if the guy would ever play again, and his team that he single handily rebuilt cast him off in part because of the questions behind the injury; the injury in question being the potential for life altering, either currently or after one bad hit. (peyton's neck issue is similar to what Neck Collins injury was, and Collins career is done, most likely). So it's hard to tell which is the better "comeback" in relation to the injury. Both are beyond belief. Peterson, regardless of comeback story, did something only a handful of other players have ever done in the NFL history (rush for over 2000 yards), and he ended up with the 2nd highest total ever. While Peyton's year was certainly noteworthy and he might win the MVP, I think the edge for "comeback player", since both players came back from similar adversity, should go to the guy who put together a historical year, not just a really good year. So I'd give the edge to AP. On my quick glance at the MVP history and comeback player history, no player has won the MVP and comeback player award in the same season. It might happen this year.* *except that Aaron Rodgers will win the MVP again, since he lead the league in passer rating and has amassed 4 consecutive seasons of passer rating abover 100 (first time in NFL history). #sarcasm #butonlyalittle |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
| Scott edited this 2 times, last at 12/31/2012 8:58:19 am | ||
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 12/31/2012 @ 09:00:38 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| One more thing, Sarah snuck past me this year for regular season wins. I always play "beat the Staffers", although 6timechamps and lynnelmore had a strong final week to pull into the lead and take the regular season 1 and 2 spots. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Alex - Who controls the past now controls the future 12/31/2012 @ 11:17:31 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - Today @ 09:00:38 AM One more thing, Sarah snuck past me this year for regular season wins. I always play "beat the Staffers", although 6timechamps and lynnelmore had a strong final week to pull into the lead and take the regular season 1 and 2 spots. I was playing "tie a Staffer". Winner! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Sarah - So's your face 12/31/2012 @ 06:51:59 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I am also beating Jeremy now in lifetime record! Winner Winner. |
Yours:
Total:  Rated 2 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 01/02/2013 @ 07:35:15 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Are we doing playoff picks this year? At the moment, the answer is no. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 4691 Posts 01/02/2013 @ 07:37:28 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - 12/31/2012 @ 08:54:49 AM (peyton's neck issue is similar to what Neck Collins injury was, and Collins career is done, most likely). Was this intentional? |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings 01/02/2013 @ 08:53:57 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ha! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
Leave a Comment of your very own
| Name: | |||
| Comment: | |||
| |||
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.
Fetching Nutcan Content....
Packers 34 @ Vikings 37
Sarah
Very intriguing game... I'll be there, so I hope it's memorable in a good way for Packer fans!Jeremy
And boom goes the dynamite.Jon
I get the idea behind finishing the season with divisional games, but did the NFL purposely decide to group some matchups so close together? The Colts and Texans are playing each other for the second time in three weeks. Four games out of the Packers' final seven are against the Lions or Vikings. I know other teams' schedules have games spaced differently and not everything's going to work out perfectly when there are so many variables, but it just seems weird. I don't remember this kind of thing happening in previous years, but I could be wrong.