NFL 2010 Season Week 14 Picks
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2024 Season Week 12 Picks.
Other Nut Canner Picks
Colts
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Vikings
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Ravens
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Vikings
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
Season: | 126 - 82 0.606 |
Lifetime: | 807 - 464 0.635 |
Titans
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Bills
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Cowboys
Ravens
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Bills
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Cowboys
Ravens
Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
Season: | 124 - 84 0.596 |
Lifetime: | 784 - 489 0.616 |
IND @ TEN - No Pick
Raiders
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Vikings
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Cardinals
Chargers
Cowboys
Ravens
Raiders
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Vikings
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Cardinals
Chargers
Cowboys
Ravens
Week: | 9 - 6 0.600 |
Season: | 114 - 76 0.600 |
Lifetime: | 584 - 386 0.602 |
Colts
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Vikings
Packers
Patriots
Bills
Saints
Seahawks
Dolphins
Broncos
Chargers
Cowboys
Ravens
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Vikings
Packers
Patriots
Bills
Saints
Seahawks
Dolphins
Broncos
Chargers
Cowboys
Ravens
Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
Season: | 116 - 92 0.558 |
Lifetime: | 573 - 371 0.607 |
Colts
Raiders
Falcons
Commanders
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Bears
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chiefs
Eagles
Ravens
Raiders
Falcons
Commanders
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Bears
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chiefs
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 8 - 8 0.500 |
Season: | 124 - 84 0.596 |
Lifetime: | 362 - 243 0.598 |
Colts
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chiefs
Eagles
Ravens
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chiefs
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
Season: | 78 - 52 0.600 |
Lifetime: | 270 - 156 0.634 |
Colts
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Ravens
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
Season: | 138 - 70 0.663 |
Lifetime: | 463 - 249 0.650 |
Colts
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
Seahawks
Jets
Broncos
Chiefs
Eagles
Ravens
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
Seahawks
Jets
Broncos
Chiefs
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
Season: | 70 - 47 0.598 |
Lifetime: | 377 - 206 0.647 |
IND @ TEN - No Pick
Raiders
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Ravens
Raiders
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 10 - 5 0.667 |
Season: | 39 - 22 0.639 |
Lifetime: | 47 - 28 0.627 |
Colts
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chiefs
Eagles
Ravens
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chiefs
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
Season: | 125 - 83 0.601 |
Lifetime: | 297 - 177 0.627 |
Colts
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Ravens
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
Season: | 119 - 73 0.620 |
Lifetime: | 273 - 159 0.632 |
Colts
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Bears
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chiefs
Eagles
Ravens
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Bears
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chiefs
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
Season: | 128 - 79 0.618 |
Lifetime: | 286 - 148 0.659 |
Colts
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Ravens
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
Season: | 120 - 88 0.577 |
Lifetime: | 168 - 126 0.571 |
IND @ TEN - No Pick
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Ravens
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 11 - 4 0.733 |
Season: | 112 - 73 0.605 |
Lifetime: | 112 - 73 0.605 |
Colts
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Ravens
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
49ers
Jets
Broncos
Chargers
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
Season: | 134 - 74 0.644 |
Lifetime: | 134 - 74 0.644 |
Colts
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Bears
Browns
Saints
Seahawks
Jets
Cardinals
Chiefs
Eagles
Ravens
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Bears
Browns
Saints
Seahawks
Jets
Cardinals
Chiefs
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
Season: | 67 - 49 0.578 |
Lifetime: | 67 - 49 0.578 |
Colts
Raiders
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
Seahawks
Jets
Broncos
Chiefs
Cowboys
Ravens
Raiders
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
Seahawks
Jets
Broncos
Chiefs
Cowboys
Ravens
Week: | 8 - 8 0.500 |
Season: | 67 - 38 0.638 |
Lifetime: | 67 - 38 0.638 |
Colts
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
Seahawks
Jets
Broncos
Chiefs
Eagles
Ravens
Jaguars
Falcons
Buccaneers
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Saints
Seahawks
Jets
Broncos
Chiefs
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
Season: | 58 - 44 0.569 |
Lifetime: | 58 - 44 0.569 |
Colts
Raiders
Falcons
Commanders
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Bills
Saints
Seahawks
Jets
Cardinals
KC @ LAC - No Pick
Cowboys
Ravens
Raiders
Falcons
Commanders
Steelers
Giants
Packers
Patriots
Bills
Saints
Seahawks
Jets
Cardinals
KC @ LAC - No Pick
Cowboys
Ravens
Week: | 9 - 6 0.600 |
Season: | 43 - 20 0.682 |
Lifetime: | 43 - 20 0.682 |
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
Giants 21 @ Vikings 3 |
SarahGiants seem to have the Vikings number, keep it up. Although I suppose technically I should root for the Vikings? Blergh. Forget that. | |
JonI like to watch Percy Harvin. And Adrian Peterson. And Sidney Rice. Go Vikings. | |
JeremyThe Vikings and Giants like to play lopsided games. |
Packers 3 @ Lions 7 |
SarahPackers better not blow this... for once I have to root for the Patriots. Grrrr..... | |
JonI actually like the throwback uniforms. | |
JeremyUpset! |
Eagles 30 @ Cowboys 27 |
SarahLots of snow predicted for the weekend. Yup weather talk. | |
JonPeople make fun of Andy Reid, but he sure wins a lot. And quarterbacks seem to do well with him. |
Ravens 34 @ Texans 28 |
SarahI miss baseball. | |
JonWhoa! Colts and Titans play each other on the same week that the Ravens and Texans play each other? Are the Raiders playing themselves? I'm confused. |
Josh07 - 4 Posts 12/06/2010 @ 09:20:21 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Just some more proof that Falcons are going to the superbowl They are 10-2 and no one can stop them. Matt Ryan is having the best year of his short career but is getting the job done in the 4th quarter and they will not be stopped. Eagles are the only threat but the falcons can stop Vick just like the Bears.GO FALCONS!! |
RUFiO1984 - Go Lions!!! 12/07/2010 @ 08:03:38 AM |
||
---|---|---|
I doubt the Falcons would beat the Packers again if they met in the playoffs... and this is coming from a Lions fan. |
Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it. 12/07/2010 @ 09:14:08 AM |
||
---|---|---|
NFL teams were a combined 4-0 in the team's first two games post-coach-firing this season. I'm picking the Broncos to match that trend. |
RUFiO1984 - Go Lions!!! 12/08/2010 @ 12:13:00 PM |
||
---|---|---|
"Jeremy Upset!" yeah, i am gonna be real upset after this one |
Musch - 20 Posts 12/08/2010 @ 06:13:20 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Jeremy, dont worry, the Titans will make Manning look like he is back in his prime. The real question is..what happened to the titans? Complete collapse. |
Matt - 3941 Posts 12/11/2010 @ 05:58:00 PM |
||
---|---|---|
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Get-off-the-bus-Gus-Snow-strands-Giants-in-Kan?urn=nfl-294664 NY Giants stuck in Kansas City as Minneapolis airport is closed down. |
Scott - 6225 Posts 12/12/2010 @ 09:25:20 AM |
||
---|---|---|
The Packers throwback uniforms were sort of cool. However, the big yellow circle with the number inside of it made it literally impossible to see the number from where we were sitting, no matter where the players were on the field. The back numbers had to meet the NFL regulation and were easier on the eyes. |
RUFiO1984 - 219 Posts 12/12/2010 @ 11:54:06 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Game moved to Detroit? |
Matt - Washington Bureau Chief 12/12/2010 @ 01:02:35 PM |
||
---|---|---|
http://www.startribune.com/galleries/111750994.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aU1yDEmP:QMDCinchO7DU Here's a photo gallery of the collapsed Metrodome roof. |
Matt - Washington Bureau Chief 12/12/2010 @ 01:18:57 PM |
||
---|---|---|
All hail the Matt Flynn era!! |
Sarah - So's your face 12/12/2010 @ 01:21:26 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Rodgers' 2nd concussion of the year. This could be the end of the season right here, and Rodgers's career just got very very short. |
Matt - Ombudsman 12/12/2010 @ 01:22:18 PM |
||
---|---|---|
He should have slid. |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 12/12/2010 @ 01:26:10 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Should've done a lot of things. |
Josh07 12/12/2010 @ 01:32:00 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Packers are overrated and yes Falcons would beat them in the playoffs for 2 reasons. 1. They are a better team and record proves it. 2. Falcons are going to have homefield advantage in the playoffs. |
Matt - Nutcan.com's MBL 12/12/2010 @ 01:40:52 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Matt Wrote - Today @ 01:02:35 PM http://www.startribune.com/galleries/111750994.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aU1yDEmP:QMDCinchO7DU Here's a photo gallery of the collapsed Metrodome roof. And now video if you haven't seen it. http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Unbelievable-video-of-Metrodome-collapse-from-in?urn=nfl-294816 |
||
Matt screwed with this at 12/12/2010 1:41:07 pm |
Sarah - How do you use these things? 12/12/2010 @ 01:53:16 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Josh07 Wrote - Today @ 01:32:00 PM Packers are overrated and yes Falcons would beat them in the playoffs for 2 reasons. 1. They are a better team and record proves it. 2. Falcons are going to have homefield advantage in the playoffs. Maybe now with Rodgers being out, yes. That game 2 weeks ago was a croc. Should've challenged the non catch by Gonzalez, and that's the difference in that game. |
Sarah - How do you use these things? 12/12/2010 @ 02:18:12 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I hate this game. |
Alex - Ignorance is bliss to those uneducated 12/12/2010 @ 03:08:32 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Like just run the ball on 3rd and 1 instead of audibling to a pass and getting sacked. Getting too fancy for his own good. |
Scott - 6225 Posts 12/12/2010 @ 04:50:30 PM |
||
---|---|---|
This game is on McCarthy. The only strength on the Lions entire team is their ability to stop the run, and they are trying to pound the ball on the ground. And, the illegal contact rule when the QB is outside the pocket seems like a farce. So if the illegal contact ends up with the receiver on the ground because he was tackled, is that not a penalty because the qb was out of the pocket? Also, was Rodgers even out of the pocket at the time the contact occurred? Jennings would have had to run 5 yards, and in the same time, Rodgers faked the hand off and then rolled out to his left. Unfortunately, all the announcers were interested in figuring out was whether or not Rodgers left the pocket at all. Running the ball on 3rd and 1 is pretty much why the Packers suck on 3rd and short this year. Wow, such a promising year looks to be over. And if you could ever point to injuries as being the number 1 reason for a seems downfall, this would be it, and by a wide wide margin. |
Alex - Who controls the past now controls the future 12/12/2010 @ 05:24:45 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Idk, as I pointed out in response to your comment last week or the week before, they aren't actually as bad on 3rd and short as everybody seems to think they are, but because every seems to think they are that bad, including McCarthy, it's affecting the play calling too much. Those annouceries were the worst. Rodgers should have put more air under that pass, but Jennings should have caught it anyway. The entire offense played like zombies. |
Scott - On your mark...get set...Terrible! 12/12/2010 @ 06:19:41 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Well, they are 12th in the league in overall third down efficiency, which isn't very good necessarily. Apparently the NFL sucks at providing splits for their stats. In baseball, you can find stats for any condition, but I cannot find any stats that break up 3rd downs by any sort of yardage. I remember seeing a stat a couple weeks ago that showed the Packers ranking near the bottom on third and short yardage plays. It was on TV and apparently is no where to be found online; that same stat showed how successful they were however at converting third and long yardage situations. However, until I find it or Alex finds it, Alex is no more justified in saying that the Packers are any good at third and short as I am in saying they are terrible. |
||
Scott screwed with this at 12/12/2010 6:23:23 pm |
Alex - Refactor Mercilessly 12/12/2010 @ 09:30:08 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Win probability graph for today's game: http://wp.advancednflstats.com/index.php?gameid1=2010121205 Flynn interception cost 10%, plus the long pass to C Johnson cost 10%. Collins crept up pre-snap and even at that point my Madden mind said single coverage outside, going deep, and then ta-da! WTF was that defensive play call all about? Not quite it: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ol But it says they are 19th in adjusted line yards (whatever that is), although only 24th in power, yet 5th in stuffed. So no, they aren't great at running, but they aren't Seattle either, who are 30th in all of those. Found the overall rate as of week 12, but doesn't split out pass vs run: http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/32630/need-a-yard-call-rams-not-seahawks Sounds like maybe you can get the data here for free, but I'd rather go eat: http://www.armchairanalysis.com/index.html This article says teams that in general teams should run more on 3rd and1: http://www.advancednflstats.com/2008/09/play-calling-on-3rd-and-short-part-3.html |
||
Alex messed with this at 12/12/2010 9:30:23 pm |
Alex - Refactor Mercilessly 12/12/2010 @ 09:31:02 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Scott Wrote - 12/07/2010 @ 09:14:08 AM NFL teams were a combined 4-0 in the team's first two games post-coach-firing this season. I'm picking the Broncos to match that trend. Theory fail |
RUFiO1984 - Go Lions!!! 12/12/2010 @ 10:22:23 PM |
||
---|---|---|
both Lions and Packers need their starting QB's back... Both offenses looked horrible.. Packers with their 2nd string QB and Lions with their 3rd string QB. On a side note... Are they going to paint the endzones at Ford Field Vikings with Vikings logos/colors? |
||
RUFiO1984 edited this at 12/12/2010 10:22:40 pm |
Jeremy - Cube Phenomenoligist 12/12/2010 @ 10:31:24 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Yeah, Rodgers was really tearing them a new one before he got hurt. |
RUFiO1984 - 219 Posts 12/13/2010 @ 01:57:45 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I guess this answers my question: http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_/id/20951/the-task-of-shifting-a-home-game |
Scott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on? 12/14/2010 @ 07:20:52 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Jeremy Wrote - 12/12/2010 @ 10:31:24 PM Yeah, Rodgers was really tearing them a new one before he got hurt. Clearly Rodgers is a second half QB. The first half is just his warmup half. |
Jon - 1 bajillion posts 12/15/2010 @ 06:46:15 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Scott Wrote - Yesterday @ 07:20:52 AM Jeremy Wrote - 12/12/2010 @ 10:31:24 PM Yeah, Rodgers was really tearing them a new one before he got hurt. Clearly Rodgers is a second half QB. The first half is just his warmup half. Ah, the nutcan.com softball approach. |
Leave a Comment of your very own
Name: | |||
Comment: | |||
| |||
There's an emoticon for how you feel!
My Files
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.
Colts 30 @ Titans 28
Sarah
I kind of like seeing Peyton fail, now if only Tom would get the hint and do the same. I just think the Titans are hurting a smidge more than the Colts. I suppose the final score will tell us if I'm right.Jon
I honestly don't know who will be the qb for the Titans. Kerry Collins? Is Collins back?Jeremy
What happened to Manning?