NFL 2009 Season Week 3 Picks
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2024 Season Week 12 Picks.
Other Nut Canner Picks
Vikings
Patriots
Packers
Lions
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Patriots
Packers
Lions
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Week: | 14 - 2 0.875 |
Season: | 38 - 10 0.792 |
Lifetime: | 543 - 305 0.640 |
49ers
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Raiders
Bengals
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Raiders
Bengals
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
Season: | 32 - 16 0.667 |
Lifetime: | 519 - 328 0.613 |
Vikings
Patriots
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Patriots
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
Season: | 35 - 13 0.729 |
Lifetime: | 202 - 114 0.639 |
Vikings
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Bills
Bears
Raiders
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Cowboys
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Bills
Bears
Raiders
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Cowboys
Week: | 9 - 7 0.562 |
Season: | 30 - 18 0.625 |
Lifetime: | 513 - 330 0.609 |
Vikings
Patriots
Packers
Lions
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Bills
Bears
Raiders
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Cowboys
Patriots
Packers
Lions
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Bills
Bears
Raiders
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Cowboys
Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
Season: | 18 - 14 0.562 |
Lifetime: | 137 - 114 0.546 |
SF @ MIN - No Pick
ATL @ NE - No Pick
GB @ LA - No Pick
WAS @ DET - No Pick
NYG @ TB - No Pick
KC @ PHI - No Pick
TEN @ NYJ - No Pick
JAC @ HOU - No Pick
CLE @ BAL - No Pick
NO @ BUF - No Pick
CHI @ SEA - No Pick
DEN @ LV - No Pick
PIT @ CIN - No Pick
MIA @ LAC - No Pick
IND @ ARI - No Pick
Cowboys
ATL @ NE - No Pick
GB @ LA - No Pick
WAS @ DET - No Pick
NYG @ TB - No Pick
KC @ PHI - No Pick
TEN @ NYJ - No Pick
JAC @ HOU - No Pick
CLE @ BAL - No Pick
NO @ BUF - No Pick
CHI @ SEA - No Pick
DEN @ LV - No Pick
PIT @ CIN - No Pick
MIA @ LAC - No Pick
IND @ ARI - No Pick
Cowboys
Week: | 1 - 0 1.000 |
Season: | 24 - 9 0.727 |
Lifetime: | 346 - 204 0.629 |
49ers
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Raiders
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Panthers
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Raiders
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Panthers
Week: | 8 - 8 0.500 |
Season: | 28 - 20 0.583 |
Lifetime: | 339 - 240 0.586 |
Vikings
Falcons
Packers
Lions
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Cowboys
Falcons
Packers
Lions
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Cowboys
Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
Season: | 31 - 17 0.646 |
Lifetime: | 317 - 200 0.613 |
Vikings
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Jaguars
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Raiders
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Jaguars
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Raiders
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
Season: | 33 - 15 0.688 |
Lifetime: | 323 - 154 0.677 |
Vikings
Patriots
Packers
Lions
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Panthers
Patriots
Packers
Lions
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Panthers
Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
Season: | 36 - 12 0.750 |
Lifetime: | 254 - 146 0.635 |
Vikings
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Jaguars
Ravens
Saints
Seahawks
Raiders
Steelers
Dolphins
Cardinals
Cowboys
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Jaguars
Ravens
Saints
Seahawks
Raiders
Steelers
Dolphins
Cardinals
Cowboys
Week: | 8 - 8 0.500 |
Season: | 31 - 16 0.660 |
Lifetime: | 292 - 164 0.640 |
49ers
Falcons
Rams
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Bills
Seahawks
Broncos
Bengals
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Falcons
Rams
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Bills
Seahawks
Broncos
Bengals
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Week: | 9 - 7 0.562 |
Season: | 22 - 26 0.458 |
Lifetime: | 230 - 148 0.609 |
49ers
Falcons
Packers
Lions
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Cowboys
Falcons
Packers
Lions
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Cowboys
Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
Season: | 28 - 20 0.583 |
Lifetime: | 115 - 91 0.558 |
Vikings
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
Season: | 33 - 15 0.688 |
Lifetime: | 166 - 88 0.653 |
Vikings
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Raiders
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Cowboys
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Raiders
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Cowboys
Week: | 9 - 7 0.562 |
Season: | 32 - 15 0.681 |
Lifetime: | 194 - 95 0.671 |
Vikings
Patriots
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Patriots
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
Season: | 34 - 13 0.723 |
Lifetime: | 165 - 84 0.663 |
Vikings
Patriots
Rams
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Jaguars
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Patriots
Rams
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Jaguars
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
Season: | 34 - 14 0.708 |
Lifetime: | 34 - 14 0.708 |
Vikings
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Panthers
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Panthers
Week: | 9 - 7 0.562 |
Season: | 30 - 18 0.625 |
Lifetime: | 30 - 18 0.625 |
Vikings
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Cowboys
Falcons
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Jets
Texans
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Broncos
Steelers
Chargers
Cardinals
Cowboys
Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
Season: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
Lifetime: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
Vikings
Patriots
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Jaguars
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Raiders
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Patriots
Packers
Commanders
Giants
Eagles
Titans
Jaguars
Ravens
Saints
Bears
Raiders
Steelers
Chargers
Colts
Cowboys
Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
Season: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
Lifetime: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
Packers 36 @ Rams 17 |
JeremySteven Jackson better score like 5 touchdowns. My Fantasy team is awful. | |
MattI might as well let it ride with the Rams here. | |
SarahThe Packers are a horrible team and shame on all of the analysts who declared the Packers Super Bowl Champions a bit prematurely. | |
JonSt. Louis has scored once this year. |
Colts 31 @ Cardinals 10 |
JeremyI literally have zero thoughts to express here. Just pretend I made a witty comment about Peyton Manning. | |
MattMonday night one week, Sunday night the next for the Colts. | |
SarahIt's hard to write sentences. Or should I say "Its hard too right sentences" | |
JonI think Arizona is just going to outscore Indianapolis. Either that or I'm just searching for reasons to pick against the Colts. |
Panthers 7 @ Cowboys 21 |
JeremyLuckily for Jake Delhomme the scoreboard might get in the way of some of his INT's. | |
MattSunday night one week, Monday night the next for the Cowboys. | |
SarahAre the Cowboys really that bad? The shine is officially off Tony Romo. | |
JonDallas will probably run for about 250 yards and get 2 ints on defense. |
Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/24/2009 @ 11:03:44 AM |
||
---|---|---|
I think it was way premature to pick the Packers for the Superbowl, but it's also premature to call them "horrible". The Bengals only lost week 1 on a fluke, and for all we know are a 12 win team. (Not that the Packers looked spectacular against the Bears either, but still.) | ||
Jeremy screwed with this at 09/24/2009 11:06:53 am |
Alex - Who controls the past now controls the future 09/24/2009 @ 12:08:28 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Clifton out 2 games http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4499293 AP limited in practice http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4498335 |
RUFiO1984 - I put my socks on the wrong feet. 09/24/2009 @ 01:59:08 PM |
||
---|---|---|
The Detroit Lions failed to sell all their tickets for Sunday's game against the Redskins, meaning there will be a TV blackout in some local markets. This makes me cry a little inside |
Jeremy - No one's gay for Moleman 09/24/2009 @ 02:21:25 PM |
||
---|---|---|
There was an article, I think on ESPN, about how blackouts are going to be par for the course for many many teams in the future, and how you shouldn't necessarily read anything into that about people's fanhood. People are getting big badder TV's and what not, and it's really gotten to the point where watching a game at home, especially if you have some people over, rivals the experience of going to the game. I really like going to Vikings games, but the tickets are hardly the only expense. You also have to park and eat. You have to give up all that travel time, which means giving up watching the 3pm games. |
JDUB316 09/24/2009 @ 09:38:43 PM |
||
---|---|---|
can anyone tell me if you win anything at the end of the season for having the most winning picks? |
Sarah - So's your face 09/24/2009 @ 09:59:03 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I can, but I don't want to. |
Scott - Get Up! Get outta here! Gone! 09/25/2009 @ 08:53:06 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Jeremy Wrote - Yesterday @ 03:21:25 PM There was an article, I think on ESPN, about how blackouts are going to be par for the course for many many teams in the future, and how you shouldn't necessarily read anything into that about people's fanhood. People are getting big badder TV's and what not, and it's really gotten to the point where watching a game at home, especially if you have some people over, rivals the experience of going to the game. I really like going to Vikings games, but the tickets are hardly the only expense. You also have to park and eat. You have to give up all that travel time, which means giving up watching the 3pm games. You don't have to eat the stadium food. Also, the blackouts only include the immediate local market right? So for Detroit, people in Northern Michigan aren't blacked out, right? If the Vikings got blacked out, it would only be the Twin Cities area, not the rest of Minnesota. Is that correct? |
Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/25/2009 @ 09:11:10 AM |
||
---|---|---|
It's a 75 miles radius. Even if you don't eat the stadium food you have to eat on the road. (and, in many cases, twice.) For us not eating lunch at the stadium would mean we would have to eat lunch around 11 when we hit Hudson. Obviously we could pack lunches if we wanted to, but that isn't really the point. The point is two fold. 1) There are many costs beyond the cost of the ticket, both financial and opportunity. 2) The days of people at home crowding around their 19 inch TV with a fuzzy rabbit-eared picture are over. Even for the people still using the 19 inch TV with rabbit ears, digital broadcasting gives most people a crystal clear picture. Most people have some form of cable/satellite, and many have HDTVs. Lots of people have fairly expensive setups, the justification for which is sports. If you spend $2500 on a TV and $300 a year on Sunday Ticket, it would be pretty stupid to then go to 4 games. |
Scott - Get Up! Get outta here! Gone! 09/25/2009 @ 11:30:49 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Jeremy Wrote - Today @ 10:11:10 AM The days of people at home crowding around their 19 inch TV with a fuzzy rabbit-eared picture are over. Darn right; I have a 27 inch TV with fuzzy rabbit-eared picture, with occasional pixelation as the digital converter goes in and out. Hurray 2009! Supporting Jeremy's stance too, my wife of all people (who isn't what I would call a sports fan) has said her interest in watching the Packers (and football altogether) has increased now that the digital cable has given us much more clear reception, even with our jankyold setup. |
||
Scott screwed with this at 09/25/2009 11:32:20 am |
Jeremy - As Seen On The Internet 09/25/2009 @ 12:56:11 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Well it wasn't my stance, I was just saying what the article said, but I do agree with it. |
Jon - 3443 Posts 09/26/2009 @ 12:18:03 AM |
||
---|---|---|
JDUB316 Wrote - 09/24/2009 @ 09:38:43 PM can anyone tell me if you win anything at the end of the season for having the most winning picks? Well, we thought about handing over control of the website for a year, but instead the winner just gets nothing. Which is probably a net gain for the winner. |
Jfk10intex - 229 Posts 09/26/2009 @ 09:21:22 PM |
||
---|---|---|
lol.... net gain for the winner? how do u figure? I would think a little star icon to the next to ur name or something. Anyway, im picking the panthers to win because I think it will be a very close game.... Cowboys have given up alot of yards offensivley... and defense has not made any ints or sacks. Packers are going to the super bowl sarah so get that through ur thick skull. and btw... I will beat you or at least come close to beating u this week as well... so dont get too comfy being 1st place of 2009-2010 season. |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/27/2009 @ 12:52:15 PM |
||
---|---|---|
DD is amazing. A-Rod is the sux |
Scott - 6225 Posts 09/27/2009 @ 01:11:42 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Arod needs to learn a little touch. |
Scott - On your mark...get set...Terrible! 09/27/2009 @ 01:19:08 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Oh, and "the sux" has 80% comp, 180 yds and a td. That's not too shabby. |
Sarah - How do you use these things? 09/27/2009 @ 01:28:35 PM |
||
---|---|---|
He should have 3 TDs. And since the Rams do not appear to have a problem scoring today, those missed points could be very important in the end. |
Scott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue. 09/27/2009 @ 01:33:05 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I agree with that. Two of those fgs should have been tds. |
Scott - 6225 Posts 09/27/2009 @ 01:35:34 PM |
||
---|---|---|
The vikes just got away with one. The 49ers tipped a pass that never hit the ground, but it was ruled incomplete, and the booth didn't review it. |
Sarah - So's your face 09/27/2009 @ 01:37:45 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Tee hee! Vikings are down 14-13. |
Scott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue. 09/27/2009 @ 02:08:41 PM |
||
---|---|---|
arod couldn't be putting the ball more squarely in his receivers hands, now they just gotta catch it. |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/27/2009 @ 02:14:22 PM |
||
---|---|---|
If u say so |
Scott - Resident Tech Support 09/27/2009 @ 02:34:24 PM |
||
---|---|---|
no need to catch if he just runs it himself. What I meant about Rodgers hitting his receivers in the hands, is that other than the long passes he has been preety much on the money. With probably 3 drops today. |
Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!! 09/27/2009 @ 02:35:58 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Im 8-1!!!!! yay!!! Come one Texans give daddy a perfect record!!! |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/27/2009 @ 03:09:55 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Ok, I guess those extra points didn't matter, but still. Kudos to our team for beating arguably the worst team in the league. Go Lions! |
Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!! 09/27/2009 @ 03:10:11 PM |
||
---|---|---|
37 guests? |
Scott - 6225 Posts 09/27/2009 @ 03:20:05 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Holy crap, Favre's the man. |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/27/2009 @ 03:20:31 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I need to see that play ASAP, I hate the Vikings. |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/27/2009 @ 04:07:12 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Sooooo onto next week... can we argue it's the biggest game of the decade next Monday until November when Favre returns to GB in purple? |
Scott - 6225 Posts 09/27/2009 @ 06:51:36 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I hope you enjoy your Favre, Viking fans. He's a real treat. Today was the first time the Vikings had a 300 yard passing game since 2005. At least I can say that it was my quarterback that did it for you. First 3 week analysis as things relate to the Packers/NFC North: The Packers are probably 1 fluke play away from being 3-0 (and about 4 other plays in the same game, that should any one of those plays have gone the other way, they would have beat the Bengals--who by the way are 1 fluke play themselves away from being 3-0)* The Vikings are a miracle, vintage Brett Favre drive away from being 2-1, tied with the Packers for First place. The Bears are 2-1 The Lions are 1-2, and actually don't look that bad. *this statement is apparently valid as long as I also state that the Packers don't have exclusive rights to this. There, now I can say whatever I want to say. |
||
Scott edited this at 09/27/2009 6:59:14 pm |
Scott - Get Up! Get outta here! Gone! 09/27/2009 @ 09:56:00 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Jfk10intex Wrote - Today @ 03:35:58 PM Im 8-1!!!!! yay!!! Come one Texans give daddy a perfect record!!! Sorry, I seem to have stolen your thunder this week. |
Matt - Washington Bureau Chief 09/27/2009 @ 11:07:40 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Scott Wrote - Today @ 06:51:36 PM I hope you enjoy your Favre, Viking fans. He's a real treat. Today was the first time the Vikings had a 300 yard passing game since 2005. At least I can say that it was my quarterback that did it for you. First 3 week analysis as things relate to the Packers/NFC North: The Packers are probably 1 fluke play away from being 3-0 (and about 4 other plays in the same game, that should any one of those plays have gone the other way, they would have beat the Bengals--who by the way are 1 fluke play themselves away from being 3-0)* The Vikings are a miracle, vintage Brett Favre drive away from being 2-1, tied with the Packers for First place. The Bears are 2-1 The Lions are 1-2, and actually don't look that bad. *this statement is apparently valid as long as I also state that the Packers don't have exclusive rights to this. There, now I can say whatever I want to say. You can't take credit for a "shoulda/coulda" win against the Bengals, without also applying the same analysis, in reverse, to your win against the Bears. As for the Favre thing, let me first say that I'm glad that the Vikings signed him and I think he gives the Vikings the best chance for success this year. That said, while the final drive was vintage Favre, part of the reason it was needed was because he played like crap the rest of the game. Now, Jon and I had to go to BWW to watch the game this week so I'm not sure how much of the offensive struggles were his fault vs. bad play calling, QB/WR miscommunication (insert hand swerve gesture here), line protection, etc. (not that I would know this even if I watched the game sitting next to the Vikings Offensive Coordinator, but I feel like I have even less of a grasp than usual, due to the viewing situation). Now, I'm not saying T-Jack or Sage would have done better, maybe they would have, maybe they wouldn't have, but in the interest of fairness, if you're going to dock our win because it took an out-of-the-ordinary effort to win the game, then give credit for the out-of-the-ordinary FG block that put us in a hole, or the out-of-the-ordinary bad game management by Favre in the first place. |
Scott - 6225 Posts 09/28/2009 @ 06:04:49 AM |
||
---|---|---|
So now my analysis is suposed to be rational. Yes, my first thought after the Vikings "barely" won was that fg block, which was a 10 point swing on a fluke. And of course the packers could have easily lost to the bears. But the would coulda only works when you talk about the positive for your team and the negative for another; otherwise what's the point. And if Favre played like crap then so for the mostpart did the rest Vikings offense, including AP. | ||
Scott perfected this at 09/28/2009 6:06:03 am |
Jon - many posts 09/28/2009 @ 07:53:33 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Scott Wrote - Today @ 06:04:49 AM And if Favre played like crap then so for the mostpart did the rest Vikings offense, including AP. Well it's good to see your reflexive defense of favre from any criticism is still in top form. Prior to the last drive, favre was 18-36, 221 yds, td, int. And even though I think it's a misapplication of the stat, I'll add that according to my calculations, that's a passer rating under 70. Actually it's 67. Watching the game, there were times when Favre was way off target. Like Matt said, maybe it was due to other factors, but the fact is, there were some bad looking pass plays. He looked good other times, but it was a definite mix. Maybe Matt's use of the word "crap" was a bit much to describe his play, but Favre didn't exactly light it up either. And I think the point is, that to imply that it's "your qb" putting on a passing clinic for the Vikings is, at best, an inaccurate take on what happened. Aside from him not being your qb anymore, he also happened to play so-so the rest of the game. But, hey, you take the good, you take the bad, you take 'em both and there you have the facts of life. Just be sure to tell the whole story. In the end though, he did come through with a great drive, a great throw, and Greg Lewis made a great catch. So I'm happy my team made the decision to bring in the best qb available to help our team win. |
Carlos44ec - 2079 Posts 09/28/2009 @ 08:06:35 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Sarah The Packers are a horrible team and shame on all of the analysts who declared the Packers Super Bowl Champions a bit prematurely. Shame on you. |
Carlos44ec - 2079 Posts 09/28/2009 @ 08:07:49 AM |
||
---|---|---|
JDUB316 Wrote - 09/24/2009 @ 09:38:43 PM can anyone tell me if you win anything at the end of the season for having the most winning picks? A nice warm glass of shut-the-hell-up! |
Jon - infinity + 1 posts 09/28/2009 @ 08:16:02 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Jon Wrote - Today @ 07:53:33 AM In the end though, he did come through with a great drive, a great throw, and Greg Lewis made a great catch. So I'm happy my team made the decision to bring in the best qb available to help our team win. Self quote! Actually I just want to add that I just watched a few condensed plays from the last drive again. That whole thing was pretty awesome. Favre actually made a really nice throw across his body at one point that was quite impressive. Quite the series of events really. And I was reminded that it was actually Favre's first regular season game at home in the dome. Next week is going to be ridiculous in so many ways. I'm glad it's on Monday because after reading the Yahoo recap of the game, Favre sounds exhausted and beat up a bit. |
Jeremy - As Seen On The Internet 09/28/2009 @ 08:18:49 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Jon Wrote - Today @ 07:53:33 AM Scott Wrote - Today @ 06:04:49 AM And if Favre played like crap then so for the mostpart did the rest Vikings offense, including AP. Well it's good to see your reflexive defense of favre from any criticism is still in top form. Prior to the last drive, favre was 18-36, 221 yds, td, int. And even though I think it's a misapplication of the stat, I'll add that according to my calculations, that's a passer rating under 70. Actually it's 67. Watching the game, there were times when Favre was way off target. Like Matt said, maybe it was due to other factors, but the fact is, there were some bad looking pass plays. He looked good other times, but it was a definite mix. Maybe Matt's use of the word "crap" was a bit much to describe his play, but Favre didn't exactly light it up either. And I think the point is, that to imply that it's "your qb" putting on a passing clinic for the Vikings is, at best, an inaccurate take on what happened. Aside from him not being your qb anymore, he also happened to play so-so the rest of the game. But, hey, you take the good, you take the bad, you take 'em both and there you have the facts of life. Just be sure to tell the whole story. In the end though, he did come through with a great drive, a great throw, and Greg Lewis made a great catch. So I'm happy my team made the decision to bring in the best qb available to help our team win. I agree, saying he played "like crap" is a bit of an overstatement. They were talking about it on the radio how this game was vintage Favre. Five passes where you go "woah, how did he get that in there." Five passes where you go "woah, how did that guy NOT pick that off." One int, but 2 tds, and some Favre magic. I don't know if they covered it on TV or not, but Farve was also running down field throwing blocks on any play that took some time to develop. He's a gamer, but I don't think we need week 3 the-play-is-almost-over blocks from him as much as we need him to start weeks 15-17. As for the first 300 yard passer thing. BFD. First off, even in THIS game, he shouldn't have needed to throw for 300 yards. Now, granted, there is a reason Vikings fans have been saying "if only we had a QB" for a few years, but that said we're still a running team that usually only even attempts 20-25 passes a game. Carlos44ec Wrote - Today @ 08:07:49 AM JDUB316 Wrote - 09/24/2009 @ 09:38:43 PM can anyone tell me if you win anything at the end of the season for having the most winning picks? A nice warm glass of shut-the-hell-up! For budgetary reasons, it's no longer warm. |
||
Jeremy perfected this at 09/28/2009 9:05:34 am |
Scott - Resident Tech Support 09/28/2009 @ 08:36:42 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Jeremy Wrote - Today @ 09:18:49 AM I agree, saying he played "like crap" is a bit of an overstatement. They we're talking about it on the radio how this game was vintage Favre. Five passes where you go "woah, how did he get that in there." Five passes where you go "woah, how did that guy NOT pick that off." One int, but 2 tds, and some Favre magic. Although, true vintage Favre was generally more slanted toward the good plays. Maybe 1 "what the heck was that" play for every 3 "wow, how did he do that" play. |
||
Scott perfected this at 09/28/2009 8:42:01 am |
Jeremy - I believe virtually everything I read. 09/28/2009 @ 08:38:20 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Jon Wrote - Today @ 08:16:02 AM Jon Wrote - Today @ 07:53:33 AM In the end though, he did come through with a great drive, a great throw, and Greg Lewis made a great catch. So I'm happy my team made the decision to bring in the best qb available to help our team win. Self quote! Actually I just want to add that I just watched a few condensed plays from the last drive again. That whole thing was pretty awesome. Favre actually made a really nice throw across his body at one point that was quite impressive. Quite the series of events really. And I was reminded that it was actually Favre's first regular season game at home in the dome. Next week is going to be ridiculous in so many ways. I'm glad it's on Monday because after reading the Yahoo recap of the game, Favre sounds exhausted and beat up a bit. And even though most fans would look at the Sidney Rice TD and go "yeah, so? That happens 20 times a week." It was great to see. Apparently we had to bring in Favre to add a slant into the playbook. The concept of catching a ball on the move had been completely foreign to the offense. |
Matt - 3941 Posts 09/28/2009 @ 11:47:11 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Jeremy Wrote - Today @ 08:18:49 AM I agree, saying he played "like crap" is a bit of an overstatement. Says the King of Hyperbole. |
Jeremy - I hate our freedoms 09/28/2009 @ 11:59:31 AM |
||
---|---|---|
That is 1000 fold unfair. |
Alex - Ignorance is bliss to those uneducated 09/28/2009 @ 01:36:18 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Matt Wrote - Yesterday @ 11:07:40 PM or the out-of-the-ordinary bad game management by Favre in the first place. lol, I guess I missed the transition from ultimate gunslinger to game manager. That must have taken place last season. |
Jeremy - I hate our freedoms 09/28/2009 @ 05:08:49 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Alex Wrote - Today @ 01:36:18 PM Matt Wrote - Yesterday @ 11:07:40 PM or the out-of-the-ordinary bad game management by Favre in the first place. lol, I guess I missed the transition from ultimate gunslinger to game manager. That must have taken place last season. Yeah, if anything his point was that it was rather ordinary game management, by most people's standards, and certainly his. His point is valid (if you're going to credit the Vikings with a "lucky" win, you have to knowledge that the only needed the luck at the end because of a bunch of bad bounces the rest of the way.) so I didn't feel the need to nit pick too much. I only agreed with Jon that saying he played like crap went a bit too far because the conversation itself was about Scott exaggerating the outcome too much, the correction of which was exaggerated a little too much in the opposite direction. |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/28/2009 @ 05:19:46 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Carlos44ec Wrote - Today @ 08:06:35 AM Sarah The Packers are a horrible team and shame on all of the analysts who declared the Packers Super Bowl Champions a bit prematurely. Shame on you. I know that every team has a chance at going to the Super Bowl at the beginning of the year, but for every media outlet to crown them champs before they had done anything was a little ridiculous. Shouldn't they do some research before doing that? We should've scored more points against the Rams and should've beaten the Bengals if we were super bowl bound. The Packers can feel free to prove me wrong, I have no qualms about that, but to have analysts say that with no basis is a bit frustrating. |
Matt - Nutcan.com's MBL 09/28/2009 @ 05:51:33 PM |
||
---|---|---|
My point was that, while understanding that the 49ers are a better team than the Browns or the Lions, if Favre had played more like he did in the first two games (which I think you could call game managing) instead of going 8-19 for 109 yds and an interception (39.1 rating) in quarters 2 and 3, then he probably wouldn't have needed to start up the time machine at the end of the game. Now, I understand that he will have bad games, and he was very good on the final drive, but ultimately, despite all the media talk about how this in an example of "why they got Farve", we really didn't get him to make game winning touchdown throws with :02 seconds left. We brought him in to keep the offense moving along for the first 58 minutes so that we wouldn't need heroics in the last 2. He struggled* with the former on Sunday, and the Vikings were lucky he had some of the latter to pull off the win. * Like I said before though, there are multiple other reason besides his play for why the offense struggled but, like politicians, if QBs are going to get credit for the good stuff, they should get credit for the bad as well. |
Jfk10intex - 229 Posts 09/28/2009 @ 09:31:00 PM |
||
---|---|---|
If the Panthers win this game, which is tied atm... I will be Tied for first place with matt.... and this will also be 2 consecutive weeks of being 1st place in picks :D Tied with sarah for overall wins for the season... IF panthers win... alot is riding on this pick..GO PANTHERS |
Scott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on? 09/28/2009 @ 10:19:08 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Matt Wrote - Today @ 06:51:33 PM My point was that, while understanding that the 49ers are a better team than the Browns or the Lions, if Favre had played more like he did in the first two games (which I think you could call game managing) instead of going 8-19 for 109 yds and an interception (39.1 rating) in quarters 2 and 3, then he probably wouldn't have needed to start up the time machine at the end of the game. Now, I understand that he will have bad games, and he was very good on the final drive, but ultimately, despite all the media talk about how this in an example of "why they got Farve", we really didn't get him to make game winning touchdown throws with :02 seconds left. We brought him in to keep the offense moving along for the first 58 minutes so that we wouldn't need heroics in the last 2. He struggled* with the former on Sunday, and the Vikings were lucky he had some of the latter to pull off the win. * Like I said before though, there are multiple other reason besides his play for why the offense struggled but, like politicians, if QBs are going to get credit for the good stuff, they should get credit for the bad as well. There's an old say "you get what you pay for". Of all the things Brett Favre has been in his career, game manager is not one of the roles that comes to mind. Sometimes some of the heroics he comes up with are because of things he did or didn't do earlier in the game. I have never known Favre to be a 75-80% passer, ever. More often he is a 50-55% guy with big plays overshadowing anything negative. It would be hard for me to believe that Favre would have more games like the first two weeks than like the last one. Afterall, Favre's career qb rating is not what he will be remembered for. |
Scott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue. 09/28/2009 @ 10:41:40 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Jfk10intex Wrote - Today @ 10:31:00 PM If the Panthers win this game, which is tied atm... I will be Tied for first place with matt.... and this will also be 2 consecutive weeks of being 1st place in picks :D Tied with sarah for overall wins for the season... IF panthers win... alot is riding on this pick..GO PANTHERS Sorry, I win this week! |
Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!! 09/28/2009 @ 11:38:56 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Gah. Ugh. Blarg. Stupid cowboys. |
Leave a Comment of your very own
Name: | |||
Comment: | |||
| |||
There's an emoticon for how you feel!
My Files
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.
49ers 24 @ Vikings 27
Jeremy
Finally, the home opener! Say what you will about Favre not putting up gawdy numbers, the Vikings never needed gawdy numbers, they just needed more than 50% of their passing plays to go somewhere, and Favre's completion percentage means so-far-so-good on that front.I know the Vikings are a "wear them down, then roll over them" type of team, but this "get nothing done in the 1st half, score a bunch of unanswered points in the second half" approach is going to bite them in the ass eventually.
Matt
Hopefully the Vikings will decide to play both halves of the game this week. Vikings 24 - 49ers 17.Sarah
2 2-0 teams have at it. Favre makes his first official regular season start at the dome as a Viking. Part of my childhood has died.Jon
I don't feel confident about this one at all. Minnesota hasn't played even an average team yet, it seems. The defense has looked so-so, the offensive line has looked awful on pass protection. Granted, Favre hasn't had to throw deep yet, but he will eventually. Probably this game. Will he even have enough time? Is our offense competent enough to make the needed plays? At least this one's at home.