NFL 2009 Season Week 2 Picks
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2024 Season Week 12 Picks.
 |  |  |  | |||||
| Patriots 9 @ Jets 16 Final Sun, 9/20/09 12:00pm
|
Patriots
 |
Patriots
|
Jets
 |
Jets
|
||||
| Panthers 20 @ Falcons 28 Final Sun, 9/20/09 12:00pm
|
Falcons
 |
Falcons
|
Falcons
|
Falcons
|
||||
| Raiders 13 @ Chiefs 10 Final Sun, 9/20/09 12:00pm
|
Raiders
 |
Raiders
|
Raiders
|
Raiders
|
||||
| Saints 48 @ Eagles 22 Final Sun, 9/20/09 12:00pm
|
Saints
 |
Saints
|
Eagles
 |
Saints
|
||||
| Texans 34 @ Titans 31 Final Sun, 9/20/09 12:00pm
|
Titans
 |
Titans
|
Titans
|
Titans
|
||||
| Cardinals 31 @ Jaguars 17 Final Sun, 9/20/09 12:00pm
|
Jaguars
 |
Cardinals
 |
Jaguars
|
Cardinals
|
||||
| Bengals 31 @ Packers 24 Final Sun, 9/20/09 12:00pm
|
Packers
 |
Bengals
 |
Packers
|
Packers
|
||||
| Rams 7 @ Commanders 9 Final Sun, 9/20/09 12:00pm
|
Commanders
 |
Commanders
|
Commanders
|
Commanders
|
||||
| Vikings 27 @ Lions 13 Final Sun, 9/20/09 12:00pm
|
Vikings
 |
Vikings
|
Vikings
|
Vikings
|
||||
| Buccaneers 20 @ Bills 33 Final Sun, 9/20/09 3:05pm
|
Buccaneers
 |
Bills
 |
Bills
|
Bills
|
||||
| Seahawks 10 @ 49ers 23 Final Sun, 9/20/09 3:05pm
|
Seahawks
 |
49ers
 |
49ers
|
49ers
|
||||
| Steelers 14 @ Bears 17 Final Sun, 9/20/09 3:15pm
|
Steelers
 |
Steelers
|
Steelers
|
Steelers
|
||||
| Browns 6 @ Broncos 27 Final Sun, 9/20/09 3:15pm
|
Broncos
 |
Broncos
|
Browns
 |
Broncos
|
||||
| Ravens 31 @ Chargers 26 Final Sun, 9/20/09 3:15pm
|
Chargers
 |
Chargers
|
Ravens
 |
Chargers
|
||||
| Giants 33 @ Cowboys 31 Final Sun, 9/20/09 7:20pm
|
Giants
 |
Cowboys
 |
Giants
|
Cowboys
|
||||
| Colts 27 @ Dolphins 23 Final Mon, 9/21/09 7:30pm
|
Colts
 |
Colts
|
Dolphins
 |
Colts
|
||||
| Week Record | 8 - 8 0.500  | 11 - 5 0.688 | 9 - 7 0.562 | 11 - 5 0.688 | ||||
| Season Record | 21 - 11 0.656 | 21 - 11 0.656 | 23 - 9 0.719 | 26 - 6 0.812 | ||||
| Scotttime Record | 523 - 309 0.629 | 503 - 329 0.605 | 518 - 314 0.623 | 523 - 309 0.629 | ||||
| No-Pack-Vike Record | 3376 - 1965 0.632 | 3291 - 2050 0.616 | 3398 - 1943 0.636 | 3292 - 2049 0.616 | ||||
| Lifetime Record | 1200 - 699 0.632 | 1114 - 785 0.587 | 1188 - 711 0.626 | 1182 - 717 0.622 |
Falcons
Chiefs
Saints
Titans
Cardinals
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
Seahawks
Steelers
Broncos
Chargers
Giants
Colts
| Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
| Season: | 24 - 8 0.750 |
| Lifetime: | 529 - 303 0.636 |
Falcons
Chiefs
Saints
Titans
Jaguars
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
Seahawks
Steelers
Broncos
Ravens
Cowboys
Colts
| Week: | 9 - 7 0.562 |
| Season: | 22 - 10 0.688 |
| Lifetime: | 509 - 322 0.613 |
Falcons
Raiders
Saints
Titans
Cardinals
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
Seahawks
Steelers
Broncos
Chargers
Cowboys
Colts
| Week: | 9 - 7 0.562 |
| Season: | 22 - 10 0.688 |
| Lifetime: | 189 - 111 0.630 |
Falcons
Raiders
Saints
Titans
Jaguars
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
Seahawks
Steelers
Broncos
Chargers
Giants
Dolphins
| Week: | 8 - 8 0.500 |
| Season: | 21 - 11 0.656 |
| Lifetime: | 504 - 323 0.609 |
Falcons
Chiefs
Eagles
Titans
Cardinals
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
Seahawks
Steelers
Browns
Chargers
Giants
Dolphins
| Week: | 7 - 9 0.438 |
| Season: | 7 - 9 0.438 |
| Lifetime: | 126 - 109 0.536 |
Falcons
Raiders
Saints
Titans
Jaguars
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
49ers
Steelers
Broncos
Chargers
Cowboys
Colts
| Week: | 9 - 7 0.562 |
| Season: | 23 - 9 0.719 |
| Lifetime: | 345 - 204 0.628 |
Falcons
Raiders
Saints
Titans
Jaguars
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
Seahawks
Steelers
Broncos
Chargers
Giants
Colts
| Week: | 9 - 7 0.562 |
| Season: | 20 - 12 0.625 |
| Lifetime: | 331 - 232 0.588 |
![IMG_3063[1].jpg](/images/thumbnail.php?height=18&file=/uploads/IMG_3063[1].jpg){kind=small}
Falcons
Chiefs
Eagles
Titans
Jaguars
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
Seahawks
Steelers
Broncos
Chargers
Giants
Colts
| Week: | 7 - 9 0.438 |
| Season: | 18 - 14 0.562 |
| Lifetime: | 308 - 205 0.600 |
Falcons
Raiders
Saints
Titans
Cardinals
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
Seahawks
Steelers
Browns
Ravens
Cowboys
Colts
| Week: | 9 - 7 0.562 |
| Season: | 20 - 12 0.625 |
| Lifetime: | 306 - 195 0.611 |
Falcons
Chiefs
Saints
Titans
Cardinals
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
Seahawks
Steelers
Browns
Ravens
Cowboys
Colts
| Week: | 8 - 8 0.500 |
| Season: | 21 - 11 0.656 |
| Lifetime: | 311 - 150 0.675 |
Falcons
Raiders
Saints
Titans
Jaguars
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
49ers
Bears
Broncos
Chargers
Giants
Colts
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 24 - 8 0.750 |
| Lifetime: | 242 - 142 0.630 |
Falcons
Raiders
Eagles
Titans
Cardinals
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
Seahawks
Steelers
Broncos
Ravens
Cowboys
Colts
| Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
| Season: | 23 - 8 0.742 |
| Lifetime: | 284 - 156 0.645 |
Panthers
Chiefs
Eagles
Titans
Jaguars
Packers
Commanders
Lions
Buccaneers
49ers
Steelers
Broncos
Chargers
Cowboys
Colts
| Week: | 4 - 12 0.250 |
| Season: | 13 - 19 0.406 |
| Lifetime: | 221 - 141 0.611 |
Falcons
Chiefs
Saints
Titans
Jaguars
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
49ers
Steelers
Broncos
Ravens
Giants
Colts
| Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
| Season: | 18 - 14 0.562 |
| Lifetime: | 105 - 85 0.553 |
Falcons
Chiefs
Eagles
Titans
Jaguars
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
Seahawks
Steelers
Broncos
Chargers
Giants
Colts
| Week: | 8 - 8 0.500 |
| Season: | 21 - 11 0.656 |
| Lifetime: | 154 - 84 0.647 |
Falcons
Raiders
Saints
Titans
Cardinals
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
49ers
Steelers
Browns
Ravens
Cowboys
Colts
| Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
| Season: | 23 - 8 0.742 |
| Lifetime: | 185 - 88 0.678 |
Falcons
Chiefs
Saints
Titans
Jaguars
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
49ers
Steelers
Broncos
Chargers
Giants
Colts
| Week: | 9 - 7 0.562 |
| Season: | 21 - 10 0.677 |
| Lifetime: | 152 - 81 0.652 |
Falcons
Chiefs
Eagles
Titans
Jaguars
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
Seahawks
Steelers
Broncos
Ravens
Cowboys
Colts
| Week: | 7 - 9 0.438 |
| Season: | 21 - 11 0.656 |
| Lifetime: | 21 - 11 0.656 |
Falcons
Raiders
Eagles
Titans
Cardinals
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
Seahawks
Steelers
Broncos
Chargers
Giants
Dolphins
| Week: | 8 - 8 0.500 |
| Season: | 21 - 11 0.656 |
| Lifetime: | 21 - 11 0.656 |
Falcons
Raiders
Saints
Titans
Cardinals
Packers
Commanders
Vikings
Bills
Seahawks
Steelers
Broncos
Ravens
Cowboys
Colts
| Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Season: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Lifetime: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
| Vikings 27 @ Lions 13 |  |
 | JeremyThis is the type of game the Vikings always lose. Don't be shocked. |
 | MattThe Vikings should go with a 3-man backfield of Peterson, Harvin, and Taylor. |
 | SarahIf the Vikings lose, I will laugh hardily. Is that even a word? I will admit that my anger towards Favre subsided throughout last week's game. |
 | JonAdrian Peterson rushes for 300 yards and Calvin Johnson gets 200 yards and 2 TDs. Thus ends the first quarter of the most awesomest football game ever played. |
| Giants 33 @ Cowboys 31 | |
| JeremyWhat's the over/under on scoreboard hits? 3? |
| Matt |
| SarahThis week's games are harder to pick, that's fo' sure. |
| JonLet's try this again. 40-7 New York (N). |
| Colts 27 @ Dolphins 23 | |
| JeremyReally? |
| Matt |
| SarahAre either of these teams going to be good? Only time will tell. |
| JonUpset Alert! Maybe. New coach, 2 receivers gone, rushing game question marks. Miami has some guys who can make some big plays. Yeah, Indianapolis is probably better. But in this game, I think the Dolphins can win. |
  | Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!! 09/18/2009 @ 12:05:38 AM |
 |
|---|---|---|
Wow i was the only one who picked BIG BEN to lose? Come on guys they pulled out a squeaker against the titans... Bears fix their offense in time for first home game and bears win it by 10. Cowgirls are going to get raped by the giants.... Packers will rape some bengals....Colts are good no doubt, dolphins preety much suck, either that or the falcons r that good. GO PACK GO!  |
Yours:
 
Total:  Rated 4 times. |
|
 | Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!! 09/18/2009 @ 12:06:03 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Btw sarah, I WILL DEFEAT YOU this week. MARK MY WORDS. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
  | Jon - Nutcan.com's kitten expert 09/18/2009 @ 01:45:27 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
If I could give this comment a negative 5 rating, I would. Find a different verb please. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Scott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on? 09/18/2009 @ 07:22:10 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Here's a little vindication about a call that almost lead to the Packers losing last week. In that particular play, along with the fact that it shouldn't have been illegal contact on the Packers, the Bears should have been flagged for illegal formation for not having enough players on the line of scrimmage. I'm just glad that the Packers ended up winning, because it really would have been this call that everyone would have pointed to and been talking about all week. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/18/2009 @ 09:42:28 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
It shouldn't have been called, but Collinsworth overreacted with all the "That should never be called anywhere" talk, considering that the whole point of that rule was to stop exactly that from happening too deep. It's the kind of thing that you should be pretty sure about before you call, but on the other hand that's a risk a team takes in that formation when pushing that rule to the limit as well. In other words someone could make the argument that it really shouldn't be something that actually gets a flag until you're in clear violation, so like 6.5 yards or so, like a speeding ticket (normally), but you could just as easily argue that the limit is a hard limit and you approach it at your own peril, like a plane flying too low to the ground, so you should really lay off at 3.5-4 yards to be safe, thus a formation that calls for first contact at 5 yards is stupid to begin with. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 09/18/2009 @ 10:14:54 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jeremy Wrote - Today @ 10:42:28 AM ...so you should really lay off at 3.5-4 yards to be safe, thus a formation that calls for first contact at 5 yards is stupid to begin with. . Maybe, but he was within the rules, they should call penalties based on what the rules say. I generally think that it should less strictly enforced; the contact should actually have to be more than just a shove as the guy runs by, but that's just my opinion. I've never liked these rules that limit what the DBs can do; I know you're just supposed to "cover" the receivers, but football is a physical sport, as long as you don't hit them while the ball is in the air, I think there should be a little more allowance for being physical in coverage. Obviously that's not what this is about at all, but I just took this opportunity to state my opinion about this rule in general. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
| Scott messed with this 2 times, last at 09/18/2009 10:18:29 am | ||
 | Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/18/2009 @ 10:30:44 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
You make it sound like we picked every game differently (when in reality it's only 3 and you picked the Urlacherless and Cutlerful Bears) and that I'm some sort of evil empire because I did awesome for one week. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/18/2009 @ 10:32:07 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - Today @ 10:14:54 AM I agree, both in that it wasn't against the rules and certainly not against the spirit of the rule, (I don't have a perfect video player in my head, it's possible contact was made at 5 yards, 2 inches.) and I would tend to agree with the "lets not be so strict" thought, except for the fact that I really think they need to drop the ambiguity. I don't want one ref to allow 7 and another call 5.5, not that this isn't the case already. I'm fine with it being a "only a shove" since being jammed too deep was the whole intention of the rule.Jeremy Wrote - Today @ 09:42:28 AM ...so you should really lay off at 3.5-4 yards to be safe, thus a formation that calls for first contact at 5 yards is stupid to begin with. . Maybe, but he was within the rules, they should call penalties based on what the rules say. I generally think that it should less strictly enforced; the contact should actually have to be more than just a shove as the guy runs by, but that's just my opinion. I've never liked these rules that limit what the DBs can do; I know you're just supposed to "cover" the receivers, but football is a physical sport, as long as you don't hit them while the ball is in the air, I think there should be a little more allowance for being physical in coverage. Obviously that's not what this is about at all, but I just took this opportunity to state my opinion about this rule in general. My only point was that, while "you" did nothing wrong, technically, you're still playing with fire a bit. Pedestrians have the right-away, but it would be ill-advised of you to make a point of walking out in front of cars, and if/when you eventually get hit, being right, technically, won't be much solace. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
| Jeremy edited this at 09/18/2009 10:33:49 am | ||
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 09/18/2009 @ 12:25:18 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jeremy Wrote - Today @ 11:32:07 AM My only point was that, while "you" did nothing wrong, technically, you're still playing with fire a bit. Pedestrians have the right-away, but it would be ill-advised of you to make a point of walking out in front of cars, and if/when you eventually get hit, being right, technically, won't be much solace. Except for this: in your analogy, the penalty comes from another entity much like yourself. In other words, the car in this case is just the receiver. The Cops would be the referee, so that analogy doesn't quite work, although your whole point is simply that when you are pushing the line, you should expect an occasional case against you, which is definitely a valid point. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
| Scott messed with this 2 times, last at 09/18/2009 12:29:35 pm | ||
|
| Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/18/2009 @ 12:56:28 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| All I meant was the message you took, not that everything there has an analogous role to the football play. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
| Jeremy edited this at 09/18/2009 12:57:05 pm | ||
  | Lysmal 09/19/2009 @ 03:48:24 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
 Go Chiefs!! Sooner or later they have to win!!!!!!!!!! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/19/2009 @ 10:04:16 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Tell that to the 08 (and counting) Lions. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - How do you use these things? 09/20/2009 @ 12:26:22 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dear Vikings O-Line- Favre is an old man. Please try a little bit harder in protecting him. Thanks- A Packer Fan who is still confused by Favre's decisions |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Alex - But let history remember, that as free men, we chose to make it so! 09/20/2009 @ 12:35:03 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jon "Green Bay fans are apparently expecting 4 ints every game. Child, Please." Only 3 to go in this game. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Alex - 3619 Posts 09/20/2009 @ 12:59:19 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Palmer didn't get in and he fumbled. What a crock. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - So's your face 09/20/2009 @ 01:00:32 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| That was a bad call indeed. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it. 09/20/2009 @ 01:00:36 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Apparently fumbling the ball into the endzone is good enough these days. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - How do you use these things? 09/20/2009 @ 01:03:43 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Detroit is hungry! 10-0! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 09/20/2009 @ 01:08:56 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Someone tell the packers that coffee before the game isn't a good idea |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Alex - I don't need to get steady I know just how I feel 09/20/2009 @ 01:10:30 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Alex Wrote - Today @ 12:35:03 PM Jon "Green Bay fans are apparently expecting 4 ints every game. Child, Please." Only 3 to go in this game. 2 |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/20/2009 @ 01:10:40 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| lol go woodson! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 09/20/2009 @ 01:10:43 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Alex Wrote - Today @ 01:35:03 PM Jon "Green Bay fans are apparently expecting 4 ints every game. Child, Please." Only 3 to go in this game. 2 to go |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Alex - You've got to trust your instinct, and let go of regret 09/20/2009 @ 01:12:01 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - Today @ 01:10:43 PM Alex Wrote - Today @ 12:35:03 PM Jon "Green Bay fans are apparently expecting 4 ints every game. Child, Please." Only 3 to go in this game. 2 to go Haha, I win! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - How do you use these things? 09/20/2009 @ 01:16:44 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - Today @ 01:08:56 PM Someone tell the packers that coffee before the game isn't a good idea Bush has never been a good player but I think the Packers crowd has never been the smartest. Sht the F up when your team in on offense! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 09/20/2009 @ 01:21:39 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sarah Wrote - Today @ 02:16:44 PM Scott Wrote - Today @ 02:08:56 PM Someone tell the packers that coffee before the game isn't a good idea Bush has never been a good player but I think the Packers crowd has never been the smartest. Sht the F up when your team in on offense! I think all fans are like that. Buc fans call into radio shows about that sometimes. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/20/2009 @ 01:22:56 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| not us |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Alex - But let history remember, that as free men, we chose to make it so! 09/20/2009 @ 01:23:53 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| We are so screwed now with Bush in there. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/20/2009 @ 01:24:35 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| WTF Packers D!!!??? U let them get 3 & 35 or something and then let them complete the Flea Flicker???? |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Alex - Ignorance is bliss to those uneducated 09/20/2009 @ 01:28:42 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
He can't even keep his helmet on! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - So's your face 09/20/2009 @ 01:30:45 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| So.... Twins are winning |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/20/2009 @ 02:33:23 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Get rid of the ball Rodgers... let's try progressing from last year. Thanks. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Alex - Refactor Mercilessly 09/20/2009 @ 02:59:22 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Wow, the Bengals deserve to lose for being wussies and punting there. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - So's your face 09/20/2009 @ 03:01:57 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| And the Packers deserve to win why? |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/20/2009 @ 03:08:13 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| That's a dagger in the side of the Packers if they want to win. This is turning into a very bad day. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - So's your face 09/20/2009 @ 03:12:29 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| J E T S JETS JETS JETS! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/20/2009 @ 03:21:20 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| FU PACKERS!#@*^%#(&@%&(!@%132 |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Jeremy - I hate our freedoms 09/20/2009 @ 03:23:03 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Alex Wrote - Today @ 02:59:22 PM Wow, the Bengals deserve to lose for being wussies and punting there. Agreed. That was unreal. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!! 09/20/2009 @ 06:48:01 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Well sarah this is all resting on the Cowboys and Giants game... if the giants win, my word is golden, if the Cowboys win, well... just consider yourself lucky. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - So's your face 09/20/2009 @ 06:52:07 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Saying it twice is just as nice... but really this Week 2 has screwed me up, not sure which way is up anymore. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!! 09/21/2009 @ 02:10:55 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
Lol week two screwed me over too!!! Btw guys may I remind you all I am the nutcan champion of the week. Thank you very much.   cowgirls got their asses handed to them in their New stadium. Hahaha |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Jon - 1000000 posts (and counting!) 09/21/2009 @ 02:31:55 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sarah Wrote - Yesterday @ 12:26:22 PM Dear Vikings O-Line- Favre is an old man. Please try a little bit harder in protecting him. I agree. way too many hits on the guy, even when he gets a throw off. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/21/2009 @ 01:09:21 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jfk10intex Wrote - Today @ 02:10:55 AM cowgirls got their asses handed to them in their New stadium. Hahaha They lost on a last second field goal and pretty much outplayed the Giants all night. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 09/21/2009 @ 02:51:46 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jon Wrote - Today @ 03:31:55 AM Sarah Wrote - Yesterday @ 01:26:22 PM I agree. way too many hits on the guy, even when he gets a throw off.Dear Vikings O-Line- Favre is an old man. Please try a little bit harder in protecting him. Plus, you've gotta protect your Favre. Just because he's never missed a start doesn't mean he is incapable of getting hurt. I knew the Vikings didn't deserve him. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - So's your face 09/21/2009 @ 10:36:00 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - Today @ 02:51:46 PM Jon Wrote - Today @ 02:31:55 AM Sarah Wrote - Yesterday @ 12:26:22 PM I agree. way too many hits on the guy, even when he gets a throw off.Dear Vikings O-Line- Favre is an old man. Please try a little bit harder in protecting him. Plus, you've gotta protect your Favre. Just because he's never missed a start doesn't mean he is incapable of getting hurt. I knew the Vikings didn't deserve him. Indubitably. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
Leave a Comment of your very own
| Name: | |||
| Comment: | |||
| |||
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.
Fetching Nutcan Content....
Bengals 31 @ Packers 24
Jeremy
Here's to Ochocinco making many Lambeau Leaps. Child, please.Matt
Who dey! Who dey! Who dey think gonna beat dem Bengals? NOBODY!!!... Well, O.K., probably the Packers, but I'm still going with the Bengals.Sarah
Hope the offense has pulled their stuff together. Defense is lookin' good, although that may be because Cutler is god-awfulJon
Green Bay fans are apparently expecting 4 ints every game. Child, Please.