NFL 2009 Season Week 11 Picks
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2024 Season Week 14 Picks.
 |  |  |  | |||||
| Dolphins 24 @ Panthers 17 Final Thu, 11/19/09 7:20pm
|
Panthers
 |
Panthers
|
Panthers
|
Panthers
|
||||
| Bills 15 @ Jaguars 18 Final Sun, 11/22/09 12:00pm
|
Jaguars
 |
Jaguars
|
Jaguars
|
Jaguars
|
||||
| 49ers 24 @ Packers 30 Final Sun, 11/22/09 12:00pm
|
Packers
 |
49ers
 |
Packers
|
Packers
|
||||
| Saints 38 @ Buccaneers 7 Final Sun, 11/22/09 12:00pm
|
Saints
 |
Saints
|
Saints
|
Saints
|
||||
| Falcons 31 @ Giants 34 final overtime Sun, 11/22/09 12:00pm
|
Giants
 |
Giants
|
Falcons
 |
Giants
|
||||
| Commanders 6 @ Cowboys 7 Final Sun, 11/22/09 12:00pm
|
Cowboys
 |
Cowboys
|
Cowboys
|
Cowboys
|
||||
| Seahawks 9 @ Vikings 35 Final Sun, 11/22/09 12:00pm
|
Vikings
 |
Vikings
|
Vikings
|
Vikings
|
||||
| Colts 17 @ Ravens 15 Final Sun, 11/22/09 12:00pm
|
Colts
 |
Colts
|
Colts
|
Colts
|
||||
| Steelers 24 @ Chiefs 27 final overtime Sun, 11/22/09 12:00pm
|
Steelers
 |
Steelers
|
Steelers
|
Steelers
|
||||
| Browns 37 @ Lions 38 Final Sun, 11/22/09 12:00pm
|
Lions
 |
Lions
|
Lions
|
Lions
|
||||
| Cardinals 21 @ Rams 13 Final Sun, 11/22/09 3:05pm
|
Cardinals
 |
Cardinals
|
Cardinals
|
Rams
 |
||||
| Bengals 17 @ Raiders 20 Final Sun, 11/22/09 3:15pm
|
Bengals
 |
Bengals
|
Bengals
|
Bengals
|
||||
| Jets 14 @ Patriots 31 Final Sun, 11/22/09 3:15pm
|
Patriots
 |
Patriots
|
Patriots
|
Patriots
|
||||
| Chargers 32 @ Broncos 3 Final Sun, 11/22/09 3:15pm
|
Broncos
 |
Chargers
 |
Chargers
|
Chargers
|
||||
| Eagles 24 @ Bears 20 Final Sun, 11/22/09 7:20pm
|
Eagles
 |
Eagles
|
Eagles
|
Eagles
|
||||
| Titans 20 @ Texans 17 Final Mon, 11/23/09 7:30pm
|
Texans
 |
Texans
|
Texans
|
Titans
 |
||||
| Week Record | 11 - 5 0.688  | 11 - 5 0.688 | 11 - 5 0.688 | 12 - 4 0.750 | ||||
| Season Record | 105 - 55 0.656 | 105 - 55 0.656 | 102 - 58 0.637 | 111 - 49 0.694 | ||||
| Scotttime Record | 607 - 353 0.632 | 587 - 373 0.612 | 597 - 363 0.622 | 608 - 352 0.633 | ||||
| No-Pack-Vike Record | 3395 - 1970 0.633 | 3312 - 2053 0.617 | 3418 - 1947 0.637 | 3312 - 2053 0.617 | ||||
| Lifetime Record | 1284 - 743 0.633 | 1198 - 829 0.591 | 1267 - 760 0.625 | 1267 - 760 0.625 |
Jaguars
Packers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Chargers
Eagles
Texans
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 108 - 52 0.675 |
| Lifetime: | 613 - 347 0.638 |
Jaguars
Packers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Chargers
Eagles
Texans
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 106 - 54 0.662 |
| Lifetime: | 593 - 366 0.618 |
Jaguars
Packers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Ravens
Steelers
Browns
Cardinals
Bengals
Jets
Chargers
Eagles
Texans
| Week: | 9 - 7 0.562 |
| Season: | 90 - 55 0.621 |
| Lifetime: | 573 - 367 0.610 |
Jaguars
Packers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Chargers
Eagles
Texans
| Week: | 12 - 3 0.800 |
| Season: | 81 - 47 0.633 |
| Lifetime: | 200 - 147 0.576 |
Jaguars
Packers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Broncos
Eagles
Texans
| Week: | 11 - 4 0.733 |
| Season: | 76 - 41 0.650 |
| Lifetime: | 398 - 236 0.628 |
Jaguars
Packers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Browns
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Chargers
Eagles
Texans
| Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Season: | 93 - 52 0.641 |
| Lifetime: | 404 - 272 0.598 |
![IMG_3063[1].jpg](/images/thumbnail.php?height=18&file=/uploads/IMG_3063[1].jpg){kind=small}
Jaguars
Packers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Chargers
Eagles
Texans
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 90 - 53 0.629 |
| Lifetime: | 380 - 244 0.609 |
Jaguars
49ers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Chargers
Eagles
Titans
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 102 - 58 0.637 |
| Lifetime: | 388 - 241 0.617 |
Jaguars
Packers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Rams
Bengals
Patriots
Broncos
Eagles
Titans
| Week: | 11 - 4 0.733 |
| Season: | 92 - 42 0.687 |
| Lifetime: | 310 - 176 0.638 |
Jaguars
SF @ GB - No Pick
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Chargers
Eagles
Titans
| Week: | 12 - 3 0.800 |
| Season: | 87 - 45 0.659 |
| Lifetime: | 348 - 193 0.643 |
Jaguars
49ers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Broncos
Bears
Titans
| Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Season: | 98 - 62 0.613 |
| Lifetime: | 185 - 133 0.582 |
Jaguars
Packers
Saints
Falcons
Cowboys
Vikings
Ravens
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Chargers
Eagles
Titans
| Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Season: | 101 - 57 0.639 |
| Lifetime: | 263 - 137 0.657 |
Jaguars
Packers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Chargers
Eagles
Texans
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 107 - 52 0.673 |
| Lifetime: | 238 - 123 0.659 |
Jaguars
49ers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Chargers
Eagles
Titans
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 106 - 53 0.667 |
| Lifetime: | 106 - 53 0.667 |
Jaguars
Packers
Saints
Falcons
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Broncos
Eagles
Texans
| Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
| Season: | 98 - 53 0.649 |
| Lifetime: | 98 - 53 0.649 |
Jaguars
Packers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Broncos
Eagles
Texans
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 72 - 47 0.605 |
| Lifetime: | 72 - 47 0.605 |
Jaguars
Packers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Chargers
Eagles
Titans
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 89 - 38 0.701 |
| Lifetime: | 89 - 38 0.701 |
Jaguars
49ers
Saints
Falcons
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Broncos
Eagles
Titans
| Week: | 10 - 5 0.667 |
| Season: | 63 - 36 0.636 |
| Lifetime: | 63 - 36 0.636 |
Jaguars
49ers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Lions
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Chargers
Eagles
Texans
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 47 - 28 0.627 |
| Lifetime: | 47 - 28 0.627 |
Jaguars
Packers
Saints
Giants
Cowboys
Vikings
Colts
Steelers
Browns
Cardinals
Bengals
Patriots
Chargers
Eagles
Texans
| Week: | 11 - 4 0.733 |
| Season: | 26 - 17 0.605 |
| Lifetime: | 26 - 17 0.605 |
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
| 49ers 24 @ Packers 30 | |
 | MattThe Packers looked good against the Cowboys last week, but I say they return to sucking it up this week. |
 | SarahThey were promoting a replay of the The Catch II game on the NFL Network. It still stings after all this time. Maybe it's time to move forward... I'm happy the Packers won last week (I know not many of you believe that) but it wasn't quite the thrill that a win against the Cowboys normally brings. This season has been such a let down. Hey, maybe though that's the start of them turning it around and I should get my hopes up as high as the sky. |
 | JeremyThe 49ers are supposed to be a slightly above average team, but they looked god awful against the Bears, despite getting 5 picks. |
 | JonSingletary will sack Aaron Rodgers. Twice. |
 | Seahawks 9 @ Vikings 35 | |
| MattI feel pretty confident about this one. |
| SarahRemember that national game a few years back (more like 5 or 6 or 7 years ago) when the Seahawks spanked the Vikings? Those were some good times. |
| JeremyPoison pills! |
| JonEveryone should take a moment to remember the best draft hat of 2009. |
| Eagles 24 @ Bears 20 |  |
| MattI don't like them, but I'll take the Eagles. |
| SarahWho's going to suck least? It's really a toss up. |
| JeremyOh Cutler...I was upset when the Bears landed you, but thank God they did, at least this year. |
| JonWhat would an eagle fighting a bear really look like? Who would win? Don't rush your answer. There are lots of things to consider. |
| Titans 20 @ Texans 17 | |
| MattAlmost the same, but doubly different. |
| SarahThis is the Monday night game? Do they even try to give us good games anymore? HIMYM time! |
| Jeremy[Dismiss] |
| JonA lot of interesting players in this game. |
  | Jeremy - The pig says "My wife is a slut?" 11/16/2009 @ 11:10:27 PM |
 |
|---|---|---|
|
Sarah Remember that national game a few years back (more like 5 or 6 or 7 years ago) when the Seahawks spanked the Vikings? Those were some good times I had forgotten about that. The last time they played the Vikings won 31 - 13. In 2003 the Vikings beat them 34 to 7. The game you're talking about was in 2002 and was more of a fluke than anything. It was a 17 to 10 game when Alexander took a pass 80 yards. The subsequent kickoff was fumbled and the Seahawks quickly scored. The subsequent kickoff was fumbled and the Seahawks quickly scored, again. Then, 2 plays after actually holding onto a kickoff Culpepper threw a pick that was returned for a TD. All totaled the Seahawks put up 28 points in 1:58. Outside of their mistakes the Vikings only lost by 3, so I'm not sure "spanked" is the proper word, so much as it was a just a debacle that the Seahawks had little to do with. |
Yours:
 
Rated 0 times. |
|
| Jeremy edited this at 11/16/2009 11:10:45 pm | ||
  | Sarah - How do you use these things? 11/17/2009 @ 01:33:07 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| It was enjoyable nonetheless. |
Yours:
Total:  Rated 1 times. |
|
 | Scott - 6225 Posts 11/18/2009 @ 07:05:15 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I remember when the 49ers-Packers was a big deal. Back when the NFC ruled the league, the Cowboys, Packers, and 49ers were the elite teams in the NFL. Between the 3 teams, they won 5 Super Bowls in a row, and would have been a 6th if the Packers would have beaten the Broncos. Oh how things have changed. And what's funny is that it doesn't even seem like that long ago. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
![IMG_3063[1].jpg](/images/thumbnail.php?height=30&file=/uploads/IMG_3063[1].jpg){kind=small} | jthompto 11/18/2009 @ 09:44:35 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| If I remember correctly, the 49ers and Cowboys met 3 straight years in the NFC title game and people refferred to it as "The Real Super Bowl". The Packers seemed to peak as the 49ers and Cowboys were fading. I think when the Broncos beat the Pack it was the first AFC SB win in a while and since then the AFC had been the better confrence. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it. 11/19/2009 @ 07:05:56 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
jthompto Wrote - Yesterday @ 10:44:35 PM If I remember correctly, the 49ers and Cowboys met 3 straight years in the NFC title game and people refferred to it as "The Real Super Bowl". The Packers seemed to peak as the 49ers and Cowboys were fading. I think when the Broncos beat the Pack it was the first AFC SB win in a while and since then the AFC had been the better confrence. You do remember correctly. Although, it's hard to say that the 49ers were fading when the Packers got good, because the Packers beat the 49ers in the 1997 NFC championship game when the Packers ended up losing to the Broncos; in other words, the 49ers played in 3 straight, then missed the NFC championship game in 96, and then played in it again in 97. All told, between 1992 and 1997, the Cowboys played in 4 straight NFC title games, the 49ers played in 4, and the Packers played in 3. On another related note, Since the 1996 Wild Card Playoff game, the Packers have beaten the 49ers 10 of the last 11 times they have met. The only game the Packers lost was the OWENS OWENS OWENS game, in which Rice slipped a $20 in the refs pocket not to call his fumble a fumble. |
Yours:
Total: Rated 2 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 11/19/2009 @ 07:08:03 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sarah *Roar* The Wildcat is comin' to North Carolina, so watch out everybody! Maybe I'll watch a bit of this in a Las Vegas sports bar or somethin'. In other words, the team with the Wildcat offense is playing the team named for a wild cat. Worlds collide! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Alex - 3619 Posts 11/19/2009 @ 01:13:32 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - Today @ 07:05:56 AM Although, it's hard to say that the 49ers were fading when the Packers got good...Since the 1996 Wild Card Playoff game, the Packers have beaten the 49ers 10 of the last 11 times they have met. It's not that hard to say, since you basically inadvertently said it. Scott Wrote - Today @ 07:08:03 AM Sarah *Roar* The Wildcat is comin' to North Carolina, so watch out everybody! Maybe I'll watch a bit of this in a Las Vegas sports bar or somethin'. In other words, the team with the Wildcat offense is playing the team named for a wild cat. Worlds collide! Except Ronnie Brown is out for the year. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 11/19/2009 @ 08:51:33 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Alex Wrote - Today @ 02:13:32 PM Scott Wrote - Today @ 08:05:56 AM It's not that hard to say, since you basically inadvertently said it. Although, it's hard to say that the 49ers were fading when the Packers got good...Since the 1996 Wild Card Playoff game, the Packers have beaten the 49ers 10 of the last 11 times they have met. I don't inadvertently say anything; I say what I mean. What I meant was that the 49ers didn't necessarily start being terrible at this point, since they did indeed make it back to the NFC champsionship game after their run of previous title games. Alex Wrote - Today @ 02:13:32 PM Scott Wrote - Today @ 08:08:03 AM Except Ronnie Brown is out for the year. Sarah *Roar* The Wildcat is comin' to North Carolina, so watch out everybody! Maybe I'll watch a bit of this in a Las Vegas sports bar or somethin'. In other words, the team with the Wildcat offense is playing the team named for a wild cat. Worlds collide! Wow, someone is in a kill-joy mood. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
  | RUFiO1984 - I put my socks on the wrong feet. 11/20/2009 @ 07:48:04 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Hooray for sports betting in Delaware! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Alex - You've got to trust your instinct, and let go of regret 11/20/2009 @ 02:43:23 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
It's a thankless job, but somebody has to do it. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!! 11/22/2009 @ 05:00:03 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| nice one sarah on changing your fav team icon. Pack is going to win this easily, and im hoping the vikings have a bad day but I wont hold my breath. and btw sarah as far as percentage of picks u have a 0.002% lead over me lol. You are in first, im in second. lol. Ill bet my left nut tho that the lions win, and the bears lose. :) Just realized Vince Young is QB of the titans so i better go change my pick.. lol.. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Jfk10intex - 229 Posts 11/22/2009 @ 05:04:54 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Btw, Sarah and Jeremy wtf? Sarah: This is the Monday night game? Do they even try to give us good games anymore? HIMYM time! Jeremy: [Dismiss] If this game is such a dismisal, poor chosen game, why is it that among all nutcaners this week its the closest of all the games? As Jon, correctly pointed out alot of intresting players are in this game. This game is going to be a close one, havent you seen ESPN? I mean if your going to give commentary on your page about games, try not to dismiss or blow off games that are going to be great games. For what reason? Idk. Just felt like commenting on that lol   |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Jon - 1000000 posts (and counting!) 11/22/2009 @ 06:35:19 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
With all the talk about picks stats, I took a look at mine again for the first time in a while. Even though the numbers will all change in a matter of hours, I wanna share what I found. At this moment, I'm actually one game below .500 when it comes to picking packers games over the course of these 7 and a half years. Almost makes me want to cheer for them this week. The team I'm best at picking? Pittsburgh Steelers. Makes sense. Second best at picking? The Seattle Seahawks. That completely surprises me. I get why the steelers, patriots, and raiders are 1st, 3rd, and 4th highest for accuracy, but Seattle at number 2? I barely remember they exist most weeks. Maybe it's the hat, I'm not sure. Also, Jeremy and I have the same accuracy on the steelers. Though, he actually picks at least one other team more accurately than that, but I don't remember. It's not the Seahawks though. I think it's the Lions actually. Which, again, makes sense. The team, other than the Packers that I'm closest to .500 on? Denver. Which totally makes sense to me. I haven't been able to figure them out for a while. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Carlos44ec - 2079 Posts 11/22/2009 @ 09:06:14 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Its going to be a lame MNF game because both teams are struggling. I doubt the NFL powers knew it would be like this, but still |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 4675 Posts 11/22/2009 @ 12:44:48 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| I made my picks on Monday before I went on vacation, so it'll be interesting to see how well they hold up. Already regretting my Lions pick. Poor Lions, getting beaten up by a horrible team. The day's still early though, if they were any other team, they might be able to make a comeback. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | Sarah - 4675 Posts 11/22/2009 @ 01:18:34 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| lol @ the lions |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
  | Musch 11/22/2009 @ 03:20:26 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Steelers... Really? |
Yours:
Total: Rated 1 times. |
|
  | Lysmal 11/22/2009 @ 03:44:51 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
 The Chiefs have WON two in a roll, I can't believe it..we bet the Steelers!!Huray!! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| RUFiO1984 - 219 Posts 11/22/2009 @ 04:47:24 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
They won :) |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 4675 Posts 11/22/2009 @ 04:59:42 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
That was pretty cool. I was lol'ing at the fact that I said they couldn't come back and lo and behold there they went. Hope this doesn't make Thursday rough for the Packers. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 4675 Posts 11/22/2009 @ 05:29:50 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Al Harris AND Aaron Kampman are done for the year, that's not going to help us get into the playoffs! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
| Sarah perfected this at 11/22/2009 5:49:39 pm | ||
|
| Sarah - How do you use these things? 11/22/2009 @ 10:32:41 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Did we really need to see Devin Hester's bare ass on that replay? I don't think so. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| RUFiO1984 - 219 Posts 11/22/2009 @ 10:40:39 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sarah Wrote - Today @ 11:32:41 PM Did we really need to see Devin Hester's bare ass on that replay? I don't think so. LOL |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
 | RUFiO1984 - 219 Posts 11/22/2009 @ 10:42:37 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| YAY I will win this week if the Titans win! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Musch - 20 Posts 11/23/2009 @ 04:27:12 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| oh no, i think if the titans dont win, im gonna be the pooper :( |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 11/23/2009 @ 07:27:52 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sarah Wrote - Yesterday @ 06:29:50 PM Al Harris AND Aaron Kampman are done for the year, that's not going to help us get into the playoffs! Those guys weren't any good anyway. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| jthompto - 209 Posts 11/23/2009 @ 10:34:45 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Scott Wrote - 12/31/1969 @ 06:00:00 PM Sarah Wrote - 12/31/1969 @ 06:00:00 PM Those guys weren't any good anyway.Al Harris AND Aaron Kampman are done for the year, that's not going to help us get into the playoffs! Hope your joking. Harris is one of the more physical corners in the league and Kampman was a beast until those morons turned him into a linebacker. However it doesn't neccesarily mean the end. Not gonna win the division but the wild card race is wide open. The Cowboys, Eagles, and Giants will beat up on eachother and Atlanta is fading. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - On your mark...get set...Terrible! 11/23/2009 @ 10:45:38 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
jthompto Wrote - Today @ 11:34:45 AM Scott Wrote - Today @ 08:27:52 AM Hope your joking. Harris is one of the more physical corners in the league and Kampman was a beast until those morons turned him into a linebacker. However it doesn't neccesarily mean the end. Not gonna win the division but the wild card race is wide open. The Cowboys, Eagles, and Giants will beat up on eachother and Atlanta is fading.Sarah Wrote - Yesterday @ 06:29:50 PM Those guys weren't any good anyway.Al Harris AND Aaron Kampman are done for the year, that's not going to help us get into the playoffs! Of course I'm kidding. The packers three best defensive players in order are probably Woodson, Kampman, and Harris. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - So's your face 11/23/2009 @ 08:23:47 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| What about CJ and JJ? |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 11/24/2009 @ 06:23:11 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
4th and 5th |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
  | craig - No, it's time to move on. 11/24/2009 @ 10:00:35 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musch Wrote - Yesterday @ 04:27:12 AM oh no, i think if the titans dont win, im gonna be the pooper :( I am the pooper! 9-7! Sheesh... an easy week I guess. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Jeremy - 1.21 Gigawatts!?!? 11/24/2009 @ 04:09:46 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jfk10intex Wrote - 11/22/2009 @ 05:04:54 AM Btw, Sarah and Jeremy wtf? Sarah: This is the Monday night game? Do they even try to give us good games anymore? HIMYM time! Jeremy: [Dismiss] If this game is such a dismisal, poor chosen game, why is it that among all nutcaners this week its the closest of all the games? As Jon, correctly pointed out alot of intresting players are in this game. This game is going to be a close one, havent you seen ESPN? I mean if your going to give commentary on your page about games, try not to dismiss or blow off games that are going to be great games. For what reason? Idk. Just felt like commenting on that lol To be fair, I just had nothing to say about it, I wasn't judging it. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - So's your face 11/24/2009 @ 06:00:40 PM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Who are 5, 6, 7, 8? I can see NB being in there, but that's about it. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Jon - many posts 11/25/2009 @ 03:37:04 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Hey Sarah, you and I are tied all time. Which kind of sucks cause I had a nine game lead at the beginning of the season. Still, kind of cool. |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Sarah - 4675 Posts 11/25/2009 @ 08:42:42 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
| Not for long.... I'm about to dominate! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings 11/25/2009 @ 09:15:20 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Sarah Wrote - Yesterday @ 07:00:40 PM Who are 5, 6, 7, 8? I can see NB being in there, but that's about it. Defensively? Here's how I'd rank them, Woodson, Kampman, Harris, Jolly, Jenkins, barnett, collins, Clay Matthews (matthews may be a stretch, but he is proving himself every single week), |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
|
| Scott - 6225 Posts 11/25/2009 @ 09:18:11 AM |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jon Wrote - Today @ 04:37:04 AM Hey Sarah, you and I are tied all time. Which kind of sucks cause I had a nine game lead at the beginning of the season. Still, kind of cool. I can't compete for all-time wins, but I have the highest winning percentage for anyone who has made over 900 picks! |
Yours:
Rated 0 times. |
|
Leave a Comment of your very own
| Name: | |||
| Comment: | |||
| |||
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.
Fetching Nutcan Content....
Dolphins 24 @ Panthers 17
Sarah
*Roar* The Wildcat is comin' to North Carolina, so watch out everybody! Maybe I'll watch a bit of this in a Las Vegas sports bar or somethin'.Jeremy
Who cares, we'll be in Vegas.Jon
Really intriguing matchup. With Brown, I'd probably easily pick Miami. But I'm not so sure without him. He's kind of the main offensive weapon. At least that's my understanding. Ricky Williams is a good backup, but as a starter we don't know. And since their offense is somewhat unconventional, can he really step right in for Brown? I can tell you one thing, I wouldn't expect him to pass. Granted, Ronnie Brown doesn't throw a ton (only six times all year) but the option is there when he's in the game. I read an interview with Williams where I think he said he doesn't even want to throw the ball. I really don't expect much from Carolina from week to week. They are probably as hit-and-miss as they come. But they have their main players healthy and they're at home. I would almost be surprised if this game didn't somehow surprise me though.