NFL 2008 Season Week 6 Picks
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2024 Season Week 12 Picks.
Other Nut Canner Picks
Texans
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Week: | 9 - 5 0.643 |
Season: | 56 - 32 0.636 |
Lifetime: | 393 - 229 0.632 |
Texans
Panthers
Vikings
Falcons
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Jaguars
Cardinals
49ers
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Panthers
Vikings
Falcons
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Jaguars
Cardinals
49ers
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Week: | 10 - 4 0.714 |
Season: | 55 - 33 0.625 |
Lifetime: | 378 - 243 0.609 |
Dolphins
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Seahawks
Patriots
Giants
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Seahawks
Patriots
Giants
Week: | 6 - 8 0.429 |
Season: | 49 - 39 0.557 |
Lifetime: | 375 - 243 0.607 |
Dolphins
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Jaguars
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Jaguars
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Week: | 9 - 5 0.643 |
Season: | 9 - 5 0.643 |
Lifetime: | 112 - 93 0.546 |
Dolphins
Panthers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Panthers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Week: | 7 - 7 0.500 |
Season: | 47 - 41 0.534 |
Lifetime: | 216 - 139 0.609 |
Texans
Panthers
Vikings
Falcons
Commanders
Saints
Bengals
Colts
Jaguars
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Patriots
Giants
Panthers
Vikings
Falcons
Commanders
Saints
Bengals
Colts
Jaguars
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Patriots
Giants
Week: | 8 - 6 0.571 |
Season: | 40 - 48 0.455 |
Lifetime: | 204 - 151 0.575 |
Texans
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Seahawks
Chargers
Giants
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Seahawks
Chargers
Giants
Week: | 8 - 6 0.571 |
Season: | 44 - 44 0.500 |
Lifetime: | 180 - 131 0.579 |
Texans
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Raiders
Jets
Ravens
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Seahawks
Chargers
Giants
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Raiders
Jets
Ravens
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Seahawks
Chargers
Giants
Week: | 6 - 8 0.429 |
Season: | 52 - 36 0.591 |
Lifetime: | 217 - 123 0.638 |
Dolphins
Panthers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Ravens
Jaguars
Cowboys
Eagles
Seahawks
Chargers
Giants
Panthers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Ravens
Jaguars
Cowboys
Eagles
Seahawks
Chargers
Giants
Week: | 6 - 8 0.429 |
Season: | 50 - 38 0.568 |
Lifetime: | 172 - 121 0.587 |
Texans
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Ravens
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Ravens
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Week: | 8 - 6 0.571 |
Season: | 53 - 35 0.602 |
Lifetime: | 197 - 96 0.672 |
Dolphins
Panthers
Vikings
Falcons
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Patriots
Giants
Panthers
Vikings
Falcons
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Patriots
Giants
Week: | 7 - 7 0.500 |
Season: | 52 - 36 0.591 |
Lifetime: | 153 - 86 0.640 |
Texans
Panthers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Bengals
Colts
Broncos
Cardinals
Eagles
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Panthers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Bengals
Colts
Broncos
Cardinals
Eagles
Packers
Patriots
Browns
Week: | 8 - 6 0.571 |
Season: | 57 - 30 0.655 |
Lifetime: | 142 - 81 0.637 |
Dolphins
Panthers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Panthers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Week: | 7 - 7 0.500 |
Season: | 47 - 28 0.627 |
Lifetime: | 83 - 54 0.606 |
Dolphins
Buccaneers
Vikings
Falcons
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Buccaneers
Vikings
Falcons
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Week: | 9 - 5 0.643 |
Season: | 40 - 24 0.625 |
Lifetime: | 93 - 50 0.650 |
Dolphins
Panthers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Raiders
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Panthers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Raiders
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Week: | 6 - 8 0.429 |
Season: | 33 - 24 0.579 |
Lifetime: | 107 - 73 0.594 |
Dolphins
Panthers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Patriots
Giants
Panthers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Patriots
Giants
Week: | 6 - 8 0.429 |
Season: | 52 - 36 0.591 |
Lifetime: | 140 - 71 0.663 |
Dolphins
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Ravens
Broncos
Cowboys
49ers
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Ravens
Broncos
Cowboys
49ers
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Week: | 6 - 8 0.429 |
Season: | 50 - 38 0.568 |
Lifetime: | 50 - 38 0.568 |
Dolphins
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Patriots
Giants
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Patriots
Giants
Week: | 7 - 7 0.500 |
Season: | 53 - 35 0.602 |
Lifetime: | 53 - 35 0.602 |
Dolphins
Buccaneers
Vikings
Falcons
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Ravens
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Buccaneers
Vikings
Falcons
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Ravens
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Chargers
Giants
Week: | 8 - 6 0.571 |
Season: | 46 - 26 0.639 |
Lifetime: | 46 - 26 0.639 |
Dolphins
Panthers
Vikings
Falcons
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Seahawks
Chargers
Giants
Panthers
Vikings
Falcons
Commanders
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Seahawks
Chargers
Giants
Week: | 7 - 7 0.500 |
Season: | 22 - 19 0.537 |
Lifetime: | 22 - 19 0.537 |
Dolphins
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Rams
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Patriots
Giants
Buccaneers
Vikings
Bears
Rams
Saints
Jets
Colts
Broncos
Cowboys
Eagles
Packers
Patriots
Giants
Week: | 8 - 6 0.571 |
Season: | 8 - 6 0.571 |
Lifetime: | 8 - 6 0.571 |
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
Packers 27 @ Seahawks 17 |
JeremyThough they should win this one, things could get rough for the Packers over their next few games. | |
MattWho cares? | |
JonI think I like Mike Holmgren. | |
SarahThe Seahawks have like no one left. However, I wouldn't put it past them to sneak by the Pack, who have lost their last 3. Shape up or Ship out! |
Patriots 10 @ Chargers 30 |
JeremyThe great Futile-Off of 2008 | |
MattBoth these teams suck. | |
JonI think this game takes the prize this week. This is the game where virtually no outcome or margin of victory for either side will really surprise me. | |
SarahI think both of these teams have been mediocre this year (even with the good records). We all know why the Patriots are subpar, but the Chargers? Were they just Shawne Merriman's team? |
Giants 14 @ Browns 35 |
JeremyIt must really suck to be a Browns fan. All those pieces in place. Coming off of a season that was clear you were building something. Now suddenly their offense can't get a first down to save their life, and they're wondering if their exciting QB of the future wasn't just a complete waste of time. Yeah, that must really suck. | |
MattFree Brady Quinn? | |
JonThe Eli Manning Bandwagon has to be setting the all time bandwagon records right about now, right? I'm guessing the summer activity of all these former Eli Manning haters is taking repeated trips to Yankee stadium and booing Alex Rodriguez every time he makes an out and convincing themselves they really like him everytime he gets a hit. | |
SarahGiants are out to prove something. Maybe that they're reigning Super Bowl Champs? |
Jeremy - I believe virtually everything I read. 10/09/2008 @ 02:55:51 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Is it just me, or are we slacking this year? |
Carlos44ec - What the F@#$ am I being arrested fo? 10/09/2008 @ 03:05:25 PM |
||
---|---|---|
SLACKING SIR, SLACKING |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 10/09/2008 @ 05:52:36 PM |
||
---|---|---|
My record's as bad as Matt's for the year, so yea probably. |
PackOne - No matter how many MC's I eat up ... oh, it's never enough. 10/09/2008 @ 09:36:27 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Ten games under five hundered. Unreal. |
Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it. 10/10/2008 @ 07:28:04 AM |
||
---|---|---|
I'll blame it on parody, and the economy (which obviously boils down to being George W. Bush's fault). |
PackOne - The girls all know he's "way cool" Jr. 10/10/2008 @ 07:34:23 AM |
||
---|---|---|
I blame it on Favre and Palin. |
Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it. 10/10/2008 @ 09:17:35 AM |
||
---|---|---|
don't blame anything on Favre. In the slightly modified words of Ronald Reagan, "Never speak ill about a former Packer." |
Jeremy - 9543 Posts 10/10/2008 @ 09:37:01 AM |
||
---|---|---|
I was actually talking about the fact that we don't do game comments until way late and Jon waits until about 11:59 sunday morning to do anything. |
Scott - On your mark...get set...Terrible! 10/10/2008 @ 01:56:29 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I'm pretty sure Jeremy's comment on the Browns game is actually a jab at the Packers disguised as a critique of the Browns. Clever. |
Jeremy - Cube Phenomenoligist 10/10/2008 @ 02:32:43 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Well, it wasn't. |
Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings 10/10/2008 @ 02:55:21 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Really, because it could have been. You basically described the Packers situation pretty closely. |
Jeremy - Pie Racist 10/10/2008 @ 02:58:00 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Well, that makes 3 teams then. |
Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings 10/10/2008 @ 02:58:51 PM |
||
---|---|---|
yeah I guess. |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 10/10/2008 @ 06:12:14 PM |
||
---|---|---|
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3636994 Happy Birthday Brett! |
Matt - 3941 Posts 10/10/2008 @ 10:02:45 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Jeremy Wrote - Yesterday @ 09:37:01 AM I was actually talking about the fact that we don't do game comments until way late and Jon waits until about 11:59 sunday morning to do anything. Maybe it's because nobody has anything worthwhile to say about any of the games, and that nobody even reads and/or cares what we do end up writing. Scott Wrote - Yesterday @ 07:28:04 AM I'll blame it on parody, and the economy (which obviously boils down to being George W. Bush's fault). I blame it on sarcasm. |
||
Matt edited this at 10/11/2008 12:55:36 am |
Jeremy - 9543 Posts 10/11/2008 @ 12:39:51 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Matt Wrote - Yesterday @ 10:02:45 PM Maybe it's because nobody has anything worthwhile to say about any of the games, and that nobody even reads and or cares what we do end up writing. Agreed. I'm torn because it's such a corner stone of nutcan tradition, but would anyone be terribly upset, or even notice, if I didn't bother recreating these in the next nutcan revision. (That is to say I'd still show the comments that are already made. Although, if I do that most of the work is done, since actually prompting for the text is the "easy" part. Hmm.) |
||
Jeremy messed with this 2 times, last at 10/11/2008 12:43:11 am |
Matt - Nutcan.com's MBL 10/11/2008 @ 12:57:27 AM |
||
---|---|---|
I think that we should discuss possible changes or replacements for the game comments at the next Nutcan retreat. |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 10/11/2008 @ 09:46:24 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Matt Wrote - Today @ 12:57:27 AM I think that we should discuss possible changes or replacements for the game comments at the next Nutcan retreat. Chicago Trip II? |
Matt - 3941 Posts 10/11/2008 @ 09:55:18 AM |
||
---|---|---|
That's a zero nutter for causing emotional pain and suffering. |
Jon - 1000000 posts (and counting!) 10/12/2008 @ 05:09:31 AM |
||
---|---|---|
I can't believe what's going on. 1) First Sarah calls Peyton Manning "Payton"**** and now she uses the incorrect version of their/they're/there And I'm sorry to put such a spotlight on a mistake that everyone makes, but it just seems so out of character. Is someone hacking her account? Plus, I'm pretty sure Sarah would shame any of the rest of us if we ever made such errors. (I love you Sarah, don't hate me.) 2) What's all this talk about not doing game comments? I don't care if no one reads them. We're doing them. I'll grant you that some of the games are difficult to write about every now and then, but if you can't think of 4 semi-original thoughts per week that are vaguely football related, then maybe we should all get outside more or get a new hobby, because our brains should be capable of such an exercise. And as for their usefulness and whether people read them or not, I say this: If they don't read them, it's their loss. There's good information in there. Jeremy already predicted Rodgers' first three interceptions, and I was on the right track when I said the Chargers were gonna intercept Favre for three touchdowns, and those examples are just off the top of my head. (As for lateness of picks and comments, I can't speak for the rest of you, but I do picks and comments on Friday/Saturday. That's just my thing. Sometimes Thursday if I feel like it and sometimes in the middle of the night before the games if I was out of town and/or sick like I've been the last two days. I'm not against people getting them done days in advance but I don't think it's necessary since it's not something people need to ruminate on -- the comments serve roughly the same purpose on Tuesday as they do just before kickoff. Though I guess they could spark discussions, but that has it's pros and cons too, since it always devolves into a Favre-based feud anyway. I guess, in general, I think we should aim to have them in at least 24 hours before gametime, just for good measure.) ****EDIT (10/13/2008): Sarah did not make the "Payton" mistake. Jon screwed this fact up and begs for forgiveness from Sarah for maligning her character. |
||
Jon perfected this 4 times, last at 10/13/2008 3:51:13 am |
Sarah - So's your face 10/12/2008 @ 08:42:29 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Jon Wrote - Today @ 05:09:31 AM I can't believe what's going on. 1) First Sarah calls Peyton Manning "Payton" and now she uses the incorrect version of their/they're/there And I'm sorry to put such a spotlight on a mistake that everyone makes, but it just seems so out of character. Is someone hacking her account? Plus, I'm pretty sure Sarah would shame any of the rest of us if we ever made such errors. (I love you Sarah, don't hate me.) Well the their/they're mistake is inexcusable, but where did I say Payton? Someone is probably hacking into my account since it has happened before. (See Favre/Farve fiasco). |
Alex - Refactor Mercilessly 10/12/2008 @ 10:58:58 AM |
||
---|---|---|
So according the pick distribution Panthers @ Buccaneers is the game of the week? I'll buy that. |
Sarah - So's your face 10/12/2008 @ 01:48:24 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Oooo those tricky Lions. I didn't hear about the 50 year curse until they talked about it during the game. Too funny. |
Scott - Get Up! Get outta here! Gone! 10/12/2008 @ 02:37:14 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Wow, the Buccaneers are putting a thumping on the Panthers. Carolina seems like they can do nothing right, and Tampa Bay looks like they can do no wrong. |
Sarah - How do you use these things? 10/12/2008 @ 02:54:40 PM |
||
---|---|---|
So the refs are just giving the game to the Vikings? That doesn't seem right... http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=281012016 |
||
Sarah edited this at 10/12/2008 4:31:23 pm |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 10/12/2008 @ 03:05:01 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Some crazy games today, I hate my picks. Except Atlanta WOOT!!! | ||
Sarah perfected this at 10/12/2008 3:09:43 pm |
Alex - 3619 Posts 10/12/2008 @ 03:11:53 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Understatement of the week. Bears still suck! |
||
Alex messed with this at 10/12/2008 3:13:05 pm |
RUFiO1984 - 219 Posts 10/12/2008 @ 03:14:12 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Sarah Wrote - Today @ 03:54:40 PM So the refs are just giving the game to the Vikings? That doesn't seem right... What happened?! I didn't get to see it? |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 10/12/2008 @ 03:15:29 PM |
||
---|---|---|
42 yard pass interference call on the Lions when they didn't even touch the WR. I could be wrong, I was flipping between that and the Jets game, but that's what I heard the announcers say. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=281012016 |
||
Sarah edited this at 10/12/2008 5:47:58 pm |
Sarah - How do you use these things? 10/12/2008 @ 03:18:33 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Jon Wrote - Today @ 05:09:31 AM I can't believe what's going on. 1) First Sarah calls Peyton Manning "Payton" and now she uses the incorrect version of their/they're/there And I'm sorry to put such a spotlight on a mistake that everyone makes, but it just seems so out of character. Is someone hacking her account? Plus, I'm pretty sure Sarah would shame any of the rest of us if we ever made such errors. (I love you Sarah, don't hate me.) Carlos44ec Wrote - 10/02/2008 @ 08:07:08 AM I am surprised the most by Payton's lack of action. What's the deal? I haven't been watching the Colts very closely, do they just suck? That was Carl who made the "Payton" reference. I demand a retraction!!! Ha. Gary Payton raised the flag at the Packer game. |
||
Sarah screwed with this 8 times, last at 10/12/2008 3:31:05 pm |
Carlos44ec - A Vote for me is a Vote against Terrorism! ...or atleast just wasted. 10/12/2008 @ 03:59:51 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Payton, Peyton... I think this proves my point that he's been a punk so far. Except that by the Colts score I think they're doing alright today. |
Alex - Who controls the past now controls the future 10/12/2008 @ 06:18:13 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Aikman just said, "continuously continues to..." |
Carlos44ec - Tag This 10/12/2008 @ 06:36:41 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Did anyone else just see that blocked kick- wait, there was a timeout before the snap... successful (career-record) game tying kick by Nick Folk? |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 10/12/2008 @ 06:37:32 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I don't understand the penalty. Shouldn't they have just made AZ use a time out then? They definitely wouldn't have made that FG from 57 yards. |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 10/12/2008 @ 06:43:29 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Suck it Cowboys!!! |
Carlos44ec - A Vote for me is a Vote against Terrorism! ...or atleast just wasted. 10/12/2008 @ 06:43:35 PM |
||
---|---|---|
penalty on the punt... declined... cards win? That one was a circus. |
Jon - 3443 Posts 10/13/2008 @ 03:43:52 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Sarah Wrote - Yesterday @ 03:18:33 PM Jon Wrote - Yesterday @ 05:09:31 AM I can't believe what's going on. 1) First Sarah calls Peyton Manning "Payton" and now she uses the incorrect version of their/they're/there And I'm sorry to put such a spotlight on a mistake that everyone makes, but it just seems so out of character. Is someone hacking her account? Plus, I'm pretty sure Sarah would shame any of the rest of us if we ever made such errors. (I love you Sarah, don't hate me.) Carlos44ec Wrote - 10/02/2008 @ 08:07:08 AM That was Carl who made the "Payton" reference. I demand a retraction!!! Ha. Gary Payton raised the flag at the Packer game. I am surprised the most by Payton's lack of action. What's the deal? I haven't been watching the Colts very closely, do they just suck? Full apologies Sarah. Total MBL moment. My fault. I knew that was out of character for you! Sometimes I do that though, I read someone's comment and think someone else said it. But usually it happens with alex and PackOne. I must have just seen the packer logo and that was it. You should change yours to a Jets logo. Appropriate changes to the original comment have been made. Attention all: I would like to publicly clear Sarah's name of ever misspelling Peyton Manning's name. She did not do it. She is an upstanding citizen in these respects. |
||
Jon screwed with this at 10/13/2008 3:53:16 am |
jthompto 10/13/2008 @ 06:59:28 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Sarah Wrote - 12/31/1969 @ 06:00:00 PM 42 yard pass interference call on the Lions when they didn't even touch the WR. I could be wrong, I was flipping between that and the Jets game, but that's what I heard the announcers say. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=281012016 There was minimal contact and I don't believe he would have had a chance to catch the ball anyways. THe Vikings did not deserve to win and got real lucky. There was a contraversial fumble call earlier on that went the Vikings way as well. Childress really sucks. How about doing something creative with the offense, they basically only had one big offensive play all game. Extremly lucky to be 3-3. |
Carlos44ec - 2079 Posts 10/13/2008 @ 07:59:45 AM |
||
---|---|---|
"Green Bay’s offense was hardly anything to brag about, but Rodgers was efficient and moved the team in pivotal third- and fourth-quarter drives in which it took control, scoring 17 straight points in the win over the Seattle Seahawks. It was a must-win for the Packers, and Rodgers came through when necessary. His 14 total touchdowns (11 passing and three rushing) in six games are beyond everyone’s expectations this season." "Javon Walker (five catches for 59 yards this season) is looking like one of the worst free agent signings in history. " http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=cr-winnersandlosers101208&prov=yhoo&type=lgns |
Alex - I was too weak to give in Too strong to lose 10/13/2008 @ 01:27:04 PM |
||
---|---|---|
The Javon Walker signing was horrible from the second someone said he was talking to the Raiders about a contract. Aaron Rodgers, steal of the draft! Sarah Wrote - Yesterday @ 06:37:32 PM I don't understand the penalty. Shouldn't they have just made AZ use a time out then? They definitely wouldn't have made that FG from 57 yards. I think the better question is why didn't AZ just take a timeout before Dallas snapped the ball? |
PackOne - Sit down your rockin' the boat. 10/13/2008 @ 04:39:57 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Better |
Sarah - How do you use these things? 10/13/2008 @ 05:34:42 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Jon Wrote - Today @ 03:43:52 AM You should change yours to a Jets logo. Appropriate changes to the original comment have been made. That's an awesome idea. "My good opinion, once lost, is lost forever." And thus begins the Jets era. |
Carlos44ec - "If at first you don't succeed, failure may be your style." 10/13/2008 @ 07:10:11 PM |
||
---|---|---|
are you kidding? I am disgusted. FOR SHAME! |
Sarah - So's your face 10/13/2008 @ 07:31:21 PM |
||
---|---|---|
So says the biggest bandwagon jumper in all of history. |
Carlos44ec - Knuckle Sammich 10/13/2008 @ 08:23:40 PM |
||
---|---|---|
not really a bandwagoner. prove it- burden is on you |
PackOne - 1528 Posts 10/13/2008 @ 09:24:47 PM |
||
---|---|---|
C. Williams sucks. |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 10/13/2008 @ 09:25:37 PM |
||
---|---|---|
So not bandwagoner per say but more of a sports chameleon. |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 10/13/2008 @ 09:26:29 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Cadillac? |
PackOne - If you got a problem ... yo i'll solve it. 10/13/2008 @ 09:27:36 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Holy cow someone is actually on nutcan. Eli is suckin it up too. I thought the comment section was fine. |
Sarah - So's your face 10/13/2008 @ 09:29:27 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Huh? I am likin' this game. Got to see Eli pretend to care he threw an int |
PackOne - 1528 Posts 10/13/2008 @ 09:31:34 PM |
||
---|---|---|
No one ever seems to be actively commenting when I come on the can. Nice Jets logo, tell your man they would be even nicer if they weren't fuzzy. |
||
PackOne edited this at 10/13/2008 9:31:54 pm |
Sarah - So's your face 10/13/2008 @ 09:34:51 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I see. Yea, I demand a better logo to show off my new loyalty! (Maybe an old school Titans logo would work?) |
PackOne - There's music to play. Places to go. People to see. 10/13/2008 @ 09:37:11 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I second the demand for a better logo suggestion and motion for current commenting by nutcan elite to continue. All in favor? |
PackOne - 1528 Posts 10/13/2008 @ 09:42:49 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Get the Nutcan.com widget and many other great free widgets at Widgetbox! |
Carlos44ec - 2079 Posts 10/13/2008 @ 09:59:32 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I appreciate many teams, but never in my adult life have I abandoned a team due to the loss/trade of a key player. |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 10/13/2008 @ 10:08:46 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Emmitt Smith? |
Carlos44ec - "If at first you don't succeed, failure may be your style." 10/14/2008 @ 07:38:35 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Emmit Smith and Ken Griffey Jr. I was 14 or 15 when Jr. hurt himself and started playing like a mortal, and I think Emmit hurt that quad around 96 or 97. That was the time- you are correct. For the record, I could not claim to be an adult until sometime around 25 years of age. "That's when I moved out of mom's house" |
||
Carlos44ec messed with this at 10/14/2008 7:38:56 am |
Scott - 6225 Posts 10/14/2008 @ 11:05:58 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Wow, I expected a blow out, but more so from the Giants being the ones dominating. |
PackOne - 1528 Posts 10/14/2008 @ 01:17:40 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Nice work on the logos Jeremy. You could have left the Vikes one to save some time. No one really cares about that icon. |
Jeremy - 9543 Posts 10/14/2008 @ 01:19:43 PM |
||
---|---|---|
It's not like I went though and replaced them one by one. |
Alex - 3619 Posts 10/14/2008 @ 01:29:16 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I guess you would have to have a 57-30 picks record to take the Browns. Or be a first week picker to take the Rams. |
PackOne - There's music to play. Places to go. People to see. 10/14/2008 @ 07:43:47 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Perhaps you should have then. |
Leave a Comment of your very own
Name: | |||
Comment: | |||
| |||
There's an emoticon for how you feel!
My Files
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.
Lions 10 @ Vikings 12
Jeremy
The Vikings always find a way to play down to their opponents ability. A loss here is practically written in stone. Last week was a pathetic performance. Though, I believe that was the first time a receiver had 100 yards receiving in the Childress era.Matt
The Vikings are heavy favorites here, which means they're going to lose. Fire Brad Childress.Jon
Expect Minnesota fans to be holding their breath for about three hours on Sunday.Sarah
What a weird MNF game it was between the Saints and the Vikings. The Lions are pretty terrible, so I will have to pick the Vikings.