NFL 2008 Season Week 4 Picks
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!These are not our most current picks!
Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2024 Season Week 12 Picks.
Other Nut Canner Picks
Saints
Jets
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Vikings
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Jets
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Vikings
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
Season: | 38 - 22 0.633 |
Lifetime: | 375 - 219 0.631 |
Saints
Cardinals
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Ravens
Cardinals
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 6 - 7 0.462 |
Season: | 38 - 22 0.633 |
Lifetime: | 361 - 232 0.609 |
49ers
Jets
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Falcons
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Jets
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Falcons
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 6 - 7 0.462 |
Season: | 36 - 24 0.600 |
Lifetime: | 362 - 228 0.614 |
49ers
Jets
Browns
Texans
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Jets
Browns
Texans
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
Season: | 32 - 28 0.533 |
Lifetime: | 201 - 126 0.615 |
Saints
Cardinals
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Falcons
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Ravens
Cardinals
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Falcons
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 6 - 7 0.462 |
Season: | 27 - 33 0.450 |
Lifetime: | 191 - 136 0.584 |
Saints
Cardinals
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Vikings
Buccaneers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Cardinals
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Vikings
Buccaneers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
Season: | 29 - 31 0.483 |
Lifetime: | 165 - 118 0.583 |
Saints
Jets
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Jets
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Season: | 38 - 22 0.633 |
Lifetime: | 203 - 109 0.651 |
Saints
Jets
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Ravens
Jets
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
Season: | 35 - 25 0.583 |
Lifetime: | 157 - 108 0.593 |
Saints
Jets
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Bears
Steelers
Jets
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Bears
Steelers
Week: | 10 - 3 0.769 |
Season: | 38 - 22 0.633 |
Lifetime: | 182 - 83 0.687 |
Saints
Jets
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Jets
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
Season: | 39 - 20 0.661 |
Lifetime: | 129 - 79 0.620 |
Saints
Cardinals
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Cardinals
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Season: | 36 - 24 0.600 |
Lifetime: | 137 - 74 0.649 |
49ers
Cardinals
Browns
Jaguars
Chiefs
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Rams
Chargers
Commanders
Eagles
Steelers
Cardinals
Browns
Jaguars
Chiefs
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Rams
Chargers
Commanders
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Season: | 40 - 19 0.678 |
Lifetime: | 125 - 70 0.641 |
Saints
Jets
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Falcons
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Jets
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Falcons
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Season: | 23 - 21 0.523 |
Lifetime: | 87 - 70 0.554 |
SF @ NO - No Pick
ARI @ NYJ - No Pick
CLE @ CIN - No Pick
HOU @ JAC - No Pick
DEN @ KC - No Pick
ATL @ CAR - No Pick
MIN @ TEN - No Pick
GB @ TB - No Pick
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
ARI @ NYJ - No Pick
CLE @ CIN - No Pick
HOU @ JAC - No Pick
DEN @ KC - No Pick
ATL @ CAR - No Pick
MIN @ TEN - No Pick
GB @ TB - No Pick
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 3 - 2 0.600 |
Season: | 22 - 14 0.611 |
Lifetime: | 75 - 40 0.652 |
Saints
Cardinals
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Cardinals
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
Season: | 17 - 12 0.586 |
Lifetime: | 91 - 61 0.599 |
Saints
Cardinals
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Falcons
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Bears
Ravens
Cardinals
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Falcons
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Bears
Ravens
Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
Season: | 37 - 23 0.617 |
Lifetime: | 125 - 58 0.683 |
Saints
Cardinals
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Falcons
Vikings
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Ravens
Cardinals
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Falcons
Vikings
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Ravens
Week: | 5 - 8 0.385 |
Season: | 36 - 24 0.600 |
Lifetime: | 36 - 24 0.600 |
49ers
Cardinals
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Cardinals
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
Season: | 38 - 22 0.633 |
Lifetime: | 38 - 22 0.633 |
Saints
Jets
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Jets
Browns
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Packers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
Season: | 29 - 15 0.659 |
Lifetime: | 29 - 15 0.659 |
Saints
Cardinals
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Buccaneers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Cardinals
Bengals
Jaguars
Broncos
Panthers
Titans
Buccaneers
Bills
Chargers
Cowboys
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Season: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Lifetime: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
Packers 21 @ Buccaneers 30 |
JeremyAfter getting sacked 100 times last week Aa-Rod is going to be skiddish this week. Look for picks 1-3 to happen in this one. | |
MattIf Brett Favre went on Dancing With The Stars, he would probably be terrible but would stay on way too many weeks as all the Packer fans would keep voting him back. | |
SarahThis was the game that could've been huge. Have fun Scott! | |
JonI almost talked myself into picking Tampa Bay, but the Packers still have to prove to me that they're not one of the top teams. |
Eagles 20 @ Bears 24 |
JeremyGo Eagles. | |
MattApparently the Eagles are good. | |
SarahEagles are good this year. Crazy good even. | |
JonLet's face it, the Bears could be 3-0 and picking them would still be tough. But I wouldn't be surprised at all if they won this game. Of course, there are injuries to McNabb and others that need to be considered, but I don't think the Bears can get it done because they still have to put up some points on a really tough defense. |
Ravens 20 @ Steelers 23 |
JeremyApparently the fact that the Ravens temporarily find themselves atop the division, by default more than anything, is a huge huge deal. | |
MattAs always, the key for the Steelers is to get the ball to Santonio Holmes. | |
SarahThis is more of an interesting match up than probably what was originally anticipated. | |
JonHere's my insight for the week, or maybe the season. Pittsburgh didn't look that great when they played the Vikings in preseason. They got off to a good start this season, but against inferior competition. They might end up being just so-so. Of course, I'm still going to pick them, because the Ravens are the biggest question mark in the league right now. You're welcome for the great information. |
Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!! 09/23/2008 @ 12:23:33 AM |
||
---|---|---|
this will be a good week for favre/ rodgers.... they will both win their games handily i think... |
Carlos44ec - Knuckle Sammich 09/23/2008 @ 07:37:35 AM |
||
---|---|---|
The Ohio Classic- two 0-3 teams- one of these teams will win this week! |
Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/23/2008 @ 10:48:11 AM |
||
---|---|---|
In all likelihood, at least. |
Carlos44ec - What the F@#$ am I being arrested fo? 09/23/2008 @ 12:32:38 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I suppose 0-3-1 is possible in football, right? |
Jeremy - Super Chocolate Bear 09/23/2008 @ 02:04:17 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Yeah, which for all intents and purposes is a loss for both teams. |
Scott - 6225 Posts 09/23/2008 @ 03:32:24 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Carlos44ec Wrote - Today @ 08:37:35 AM The Ohio Classic- two 0-3 teams- one of these teams will win this week! Some games you say to yourself "it a shame one of these teams has to lose", and then sometimes you say "it's a shame one of these teams gets a win." |
Carlos44ec - You had me at "Hello" 09/23/2008 @ 04:04:48 PM |
||
---|---|---|
In the case of "shame to lose" it would be more likely to be two undefeated teams. I agree with you though. |
Scott - 6225 Posts 09/23/2008 @ 05:09:44 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Carlos44ec Wrote - Today @ 05:04:48 PM In the case of "shame to lose" it would be more likely to be two undefeated teams. I agree with you though. Actually I was thinking more along the lines of a game where both teams are playing amazing. It's kind of a dumb cliche, but it is funny in the situation where two terrible teams are playing. |
||
Scott perfected this at 09/23/2008 5:18:23 pm |
Scott - 6225 Posts 09/23/2008 @ 05:18:08 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Sarah knew already (I must have mentioned it), but I'm going to this game. I will be right next to the Pirate Ship just off the port bow. For you non-sea worthy people, that means off the front and to the left. I'll try to make myself noticeable so that you can see me. Should I still wear my Favre jersey? I'm torn, I'm not sure if it is appropriate. |
Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/23/2008 @ 05:25:24 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Make a "Favre Who?!" sign. There's a 75% you'll be on TV and a 95% chance it would make Sarah's head explode. |
PackOne - 1528 Posts 09/23/2008 @ 05:34:59 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I officially suck at pick 'em. I also officially give up on my fantasy baseball team. I really wanted third but Dinoscores played a good game down the stretch. |
Scott - 6225 Posts 09/23/2008 @ 06:07:15 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Jeremy is apparently doing TV broadcasts for a bunch of games this season, that's why he didn't make picks for some games; doesn't want to appear biased. |
Musch 09/23/2008 @ 06:52:58 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Sooo... How bout them titans eh? :) #4 in the ESPN power rankings... even though its a bunch of crap lol |
Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/24/2008 @ 01:12:17 PM |
||
---|---|---|
The Matt Millen Era is over in Detriot. Al Harris could potentially miss next season as well. |
RUFiO1984 - 219 Posts 09/24/2008 @ 01:21:54 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I was having a bad day.. until i found out Matt Millen is gone!!! |
Scott - 6225 Posts 09/24/2008 @ 04:06:53 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Not according to this. |
Carlos44ec - "Always remember that you are unique. Just like everybody else." 09/24/2008 @ 04:23:25 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Vikings, Packers, and Bears, Oh My! neglected the Lions, but perhaps they can regain their position in that phrase? |
Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/24/2008 @ 04:27:34 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Sigh..... |
Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings 09/24/2008 @ 09:12:55 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Jeremy Wrote - Today @ 05:27:34 PM Well, I guess it is just as reasonable to say that his career could be over, which really isn't all that far from the truth. It's probably not the case, but a ruptured spleen is definitely a serious injury. |
Carlos44ec - 2079 Posts 09/25/2008 @ 11:50:42 AM |
||
---|---|---|
not to mention... icky |
Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/25/2008 @ 01:15:16 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Scott Wrote - Yesterday @ 09:12:55 PM Jeremy Wrote - Yesterday @ 04:27:34 PM Well, I guess it is just as reasonable to say that his career could be over, which really isn't all that far from the truth. It's probably not the case, but a ruptured spleen is definitely a serious injury. Well, I didn't mean it in the same sense that "Al Harris could potentially get hit by a car tomorrow." It's still a possibility he has to opt for surgery, which apparently takes a long time to heal, and could mean missing the next two seasons. (Much like Chris Simms more-or-less did.) |
Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/25/2008 @ 01:21:58 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Musch Wrote - 09/23/2008 @ 06:52:58 PM Sooo... How bout them titans eh? :) #4 in the ESPN power rankings... even though its a bunch of crap lol Yeah, that's pretty crazy. Especially since the comment about it says that the Vikings, who they have just barely in the middle 1/3 of teams, will be a "stern test of their status." We all know these Power Rankings are pretty meaningless, but if you have a team who beat up on two of the worst teams, and face a "stern test" in the 19th ranked team, you probably shouldn't have them in the top 5. |
Jon - 3443 Posts 09/26/2008 @ 11:08:38 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Or, for you non-sea worthy people, a "back of the boat test of their status." |
Sarah - So's your face 09/28/2008 @ 02:23:06 PM |
||
---|---|---|
The Flynn era begins? | ||
Sarah edited this at 09/28/2008 2:46:05 pm |
Sarah - So's your face 09/28/2008 @ 03:18:06 PM |
||
---|---|---|
6 tds |
Jfk10intex - 229 Posts 09/28/2008 @ 03:23:35 PM |
||
---|---|---|
omg..... rodgers sucks now!!!!! EVERYONE KILL RODGERS!!!!! lol..... i wish brett favre was here = |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/28/2008 @ 03:43:10 PM |
||
---|---|---|
What was I doing when I made my picks??? Turrible |
orlando - 26 Posts 09/28/2008 @ 09:21:26 PM |
||
---|---|---|
sweet pick right now by the bears |
orlando 09/28/2008 @ 09:27:29 PM |
||
---|---|---|
nevermind the eagles got it right back |
PackOne - Take your shirt off, twist it 'round yo' hand...spin it like a helicopter. 09/28/2008 @ 10:28:25 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I hate everything except the Brewers right now. |
Jfk10intex - 229 Posts 09/28/2008 @ 11:19:29 PM |
||
---|---|---|
i dunno sarah im wondering wtf u were thinking picking the 49ers over the saints...... and damn orlando got a lucky pick with the bears..... fudgers... |
Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!! 09/28/2008 @ 11:20:47 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Jfk10intex Wrote - 09/23/2008 @ 12:23:33 AM i will like to refrase my statement...... this will be a good week for favre he will win his game handily this will be a good week for favre/ rodgers.... they will both win their games handily i think... |
Sarah - So's your face 09/29/2008 @ 07:56:54 AM |
||
---|---|---|
I feel almost the exact same way, but I happen to like a good team in baseball right now. |
Jeremy - The pig says "My wife is a slut?" 09/29/2008 @ 10:38:07 AM |
||
---|---|---|
I Wrote After getting sacked 100 times last week Aa-Rod is going to be skiddish this week. Look for picks 1-3 to happen in this one. Take that! If only my prognostication skills could have been used to pick the winners of the games correctly. |
Scott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue. 09/29/2008 @ 12:43:04 PM |
||
---|---|---|
The first INT was on the running back Jackson. He did the same lazy one handed attempt two possessions earlier that bounced in and out of the hands of Derrick Brooks. The second time it happened, Brooks did not drop it. And on the final INT he was hit pretty hard while he was throwing (on top of the fact that he had a separated shoulder at that time). Don't take this me visciously defended Rodgers, but sometimes I wish INTs could be credited to the receiver who screwed up. Regardless, Jeremy did good at calling it, can't deny that. |
||
Scott screwed with this 3 times, last at 09/29/2008 12:51:09 pm |
Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/29/2008 @ 01:05:50 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Scott Wrote - Today @ 12:43:04 PM Don't take this me visciously defended Rodgers, but sometimes I wish INTs could be credited to the receiver who screwed up. I initially read this without this edited part and was going to make a "Sure, but you could say that about a lot of INTs" and a similar "I wish there was almost a scoring decision type thing made. (Even if it were unofficial.)" comment. The problem is, other than the "perfect pass gets tipped up by a receiver" picks, it would be hard to have discretion. If a QB throws it to the middle of no where maybe a guy was supposed to be there. If a QB gets hit as he throws is that on the lineman, or did he hold the ball too long? Still, even if it was only the INTs that were well thrown, but dropped, passes (or maybe end of half/game hail marys), I think it would be cool if someone kept track of that. I suppose someone might be, but I feel like that's a stat that would creep into a broadcast, if it was being tracked. Sometimes you'll hear announcers in the current game say "so and so has 3 interceptions, but 2 of them were not his fault." but the second that number hits the box score, and thus gets repeated the next week, it's "So and so had 3 picks last week, so he's coming off a terrible outing" |
||
Jeremy edited this 2 times, last at 09/29/2008 1:12:38 pm |
Scott - 6225 Posts 09/29/2008 @ 02:30:02 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Jeremy Wrote - Today @ 02:05:50 PM Scott Wrote - Today @ 01:43:04 PM I initially read this without this edited part and was going to make a "Sure, but you could say that about a lot of INTs" and a similar "I wish there was almost a scoring decision type thing made. (Even if it were unofficial.)" comment. The problem is, other than the "perfect pass gets tipped up by a receiver" picks, it would be hard to have discretion. If a QB throws it to the middle of no where maybe a guy was supposed to be there. If a QB gets hit as he throws is that on the lineman, or did he hold the ball too long? Still, even if it was only the INTs that were well thrown, but dropped, passes (or maybe end of half/game hail marys), I think it would be cool if someone kept track of that. I suppose someone might be, but I feel like that's a stat that would creep into a broadcast, if it was being tracked. Sometimes you'll hear announcers in the current game say "so and so has 3 interceptions, but 2 of them were not his fault." but the second that number hits the box score, and thus gets repeated the next week, it's "So and so had 3 picks last week, so he's coming off a terrible outing"Don't take this me visciously defended Rodgers, but sometimes I wish INTs could be credited to the receiver who screwed up. If anything, it would have to be one of the Sabermetric type stats like quality start or tough loss. Really though, I was just making a comment, not really anything other than thinking outloud. My personal opinion is that the interception is really not that import of a stat without specifically comparing it to other stats, like touchdowns or attempts or comp percentage. |
Sarah - 4671 Posts 09/29/2008 @ 05:16:18 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Scott Wrote - Today @ 12:43:04 PM The first INT was on the running back Jackson. He did the same lazy one handed attempt two possessions earlier that bounced in and out of the hands of Derrick Brooks. The second time it happened, Brooks did not drop it. And on the final INT he was hit pretty hard while he was throwing (on top of the fact that he had a separated shoulder at that time). Don't take this me visciously defended Rodgers, but sometimes I wish INTs could be credited to the receiver who screwed up. Regardless, Jeremy did good at calling it, can't deny that. Brooks also dropped 2 sure thing INTs that were ONLY "A-Rodg"'s fault. So, it goes either way? |
Scott - 6225 Posts 09/29/2008 @ 09:16:19 PM |
||
---|---|---|
But one of Brooks' dropped INTs was off of Jackson's one-handed attempt. |
Alex - Who controls the past now controls the future 09/29/2008 @ 09:40:49 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I was more watching the Brewer game, but it seemed like every other Rodger's pass was thrown directly to Brooks. The Packers should trade for him and line him up as a TE. |
Jeremy - Always thinking of, but never about, the children. 09/29/2008 @ 09:41:49 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Why? He didn't hang onto many of them. |
Alex - Ignorance is bliss to those uneducated 09/29/2008 @ 09:43:50 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Neither did Lee. |
orlando 09/29/2008 @ 11:22:35 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I'm the best for this week |
Carlos44ec - 2079 Posts 09/30/2008 @ 09:47:59 AM |
||
---|---|---|
Man, this is tough this year. What's happened? |
Scott - 6225 Posts 09/30/2008 @ 11:28:44 AM |
||
---|---|---|
I rated this 4 nuts; pretty clever. |
Alex - Who controls the past now controls the future 09/30/2008 @ 12:53:21 PM |
||
---|---|---|
I rated this 1 nut, because that was an obvious and completely expected response, setting myself up for a Lee diss. |
Jeremy - 9543 Posts 09/30/2008 @ 01:35:16 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Scott - 6225 Posts 09/30/2008 @ 06:17:30 PM |
||
---|---|---|
Alex Wrote - Today @ 01:53:21 PM I rated this 1 nut, because that was an obvious and completely expected response, setting myself up for a Lee diss. I think you put too much effort into that. Although it should be noted that Alex does need someone on any team he roots for to blame for any shortcomings of said team. |
Leave a Comment of your very own
Name: | |||
Comment: | |||
| |||
There's an emoticon for how you feel!
My Files
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.
Vikings 17 @ Titans 30
Jeremy
Two young black QB's replaced by old white guys. And you thought racism was dead.Matt
Who cares about football? The Twins need to get their act together today.Sarah
Go Twins!Jon
This should be a good matchup, if not terribly boring. Adrian Peterson is still the best player on the field, so I think that gives Minnesota the advantage.