NFL 2005 Season Week 9 Picks

	Jeremy - Broadcast in stunning 1080i 11/05/2005 @ 03:29:02 PM
Way to go Succo		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	icbeast - 3619 Posts 11/05/2005 @ 04:07:35 PM
Remember when Wisconsin had a defense? Me neither. Bad play call to pass from the 5. Succo looks like a redshirt freshman again. Someone needs to give him the Heimlich.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	icbeast - I don't need to get steady I know just how I feel 11/05/2005 @ 04:22:01 PM
With Harrington back at the helm the Bears have officially won the division by default. I don't condone TO's actions, but I don't see how suspending him helps the Eagles at all. They aren't going to be able to beat TO into submission like they unmercifully do to all their other players (Westbrook is probably one of the top 3 backs for a team that throws 99% of the game and they won't pony up), so they might as well take what they can get from TO on the field. It's not like he hasn't been playing well, or that they have any other halfway decent WRs on the team. And it doesn't pay to try to start losing to move up in the draft cause they'll never catch the Packers and Vikings. I hope NE and their sneaky injury reports get blasted to smithereens .		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - 4671 Posts 11/05/2005 @ 04:53:17 PM
Right, they can only suspend him for 4 games, although he was hurt anyway for this game. (although i was reading some articles and it said that he practiced just fine) So let's say he wasn't going to play so they punish him just for looks, well what does that do for anyone? It pisses TO off, it makes other players suspiscious and well just doesn't accomplish anything. He's their best receiver and with McNabb banged up the way he is, really their only shot at staying in the hunt for the playoffs. (unless they plan on starting to run the ball) They don't seem to treat their players very well. They have a lot of cap space, but don't want to pay any of their players. I don't have a problem with them not paying TO, but they let go of Corey Simon, and they won't give Westbrook a contract. What gives? It's all fishy and it sounds like it's not an organization people would want to play for. Do you think the Packers will end up with like the #1 draft? We keep arguing over who they will draft, Leinart or Bush. I say Bush, because we're going to get rid of Green. But it would be funny if we did get Leinart because then well what was the point in Rodgers? Phooey I say. Of course this is under the assumption that we will have a worse record than the Texans. If we both wind up with 1-15 records, then what does it go to? Strength of opponent's records? Who our win was against? 'Cause they beat the Browns and we did not, but I don't know if they played the Saints, but the Saints are better than the Browns. Patriots- I was going to bench Pass last week because it sounded like Dillon was going to start last week, but then if Pass hadn't gotten hurt, it looks like Corey wouldn't have played at all. Why do they get to get away with that? There are rules about injury reports yet the Patriots get to skirt that. It sux for FF players. I think the Badgers should just take a nap on the field.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - 9543 Posts 11/05/2005 @ 05:11:01 PM
		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - Super Chocolate Bear 11/05/2005 @ 05:12:07 PM
I love those things.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jon - 1 bajillion posts 11/06/2005 @ 12:21:04 AM
I didn't watch the whole game, but I don't think Stocco was that bad. And certainly not the only reason the Badgers lost. Penn State has a good defense.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 12:57:48 AM
Stocco was actually given the Player of the Game award on TV		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	icbeast - But let history remember, that as free men, we chose to make it so! 11/06/2005 @ 10:31:12 AM
He was better in the second half and he never gave up, but he didn't step up either. Everyone knew that they weren't going to be able to run the ball as well as normally, so Stocco needed to step up and have a huge game, and he was average at best. Certainly the O-line didn't give him much help either, but I have hard time believing that with the WRs they have there weren't more guys open when Stocco did have time. The main reason they lost is cause they got down early, thanks to the defense and one Bret Bell who just doesn't look like he ever fully recovered from his injury. And the interception in the end zone was huge too, but that was the most predictable interception ever. They should've tried to pound it in on the ground or throw a fade to Orr. Don't put Stocco in a position to fail at that point. If the Packers get the #1 they have to take Bush. Or trade down for more picks. Otherwise I quit.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - 4671 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 10:39:39 AM
Eagles Football = WWE Smackdown?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - So's your face 11/06/2005 @ 10:43:52 AM
As commissioner, I can edit anyone's team, I think I should just bench people's teams who aren't playing or looking at their teams, agree?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 10:45:59 AM
In my opinion, if the packers get the number 1 pick, I don't think they can lose. The draft class seems pretty deep for the first 2 or 3 picks. Vince Young(who right now is having a better year than Matt Leinart), Matt Leinart, and Reggie Bush are the 3 that, if Bush and Young decide to go pro, will go 1,2,3(probably) in some particular order. But Bush and Young are both Juniors, so I guess we won't technically know until the college season is over. But that won't matter because the Packers are going to win out, win the division, and go to the Super Bowl only to lose by a field goal to the Patriots, which later will show that the kick was wide right.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	icbeast - Refactor Mercilessly 11/06/2005 @ 10:48:01 AM
Bucks are 3-0!!!!! It's early, but this is easily the best looking team they've had since they got screwed by the refs in the Eastern Conference Finals (they also got screwed in those playoffs by Tim Thomas playing the best 10 games of his career). They have way more talent inside with Bogut and Magloire, Simmons actually remind me a lot of Big Dog last night by showing some range with the jumper and also throwing it down in Mourning's face in the closing minutes of a close game but he also seems to play more defense, Redd is just as good a scorer as Allen ever was, Ford is a better overall point guard then Cassell and Williams makes up for any lack of scoring at the guard positions. Throw in some extra big bodies in Gadzuric and Smith when he gets healthy, one wily playoff experienced veteren in Kukoc, and a former Big Ten star in Charlie Bell and the sky is the limit.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	icbeast - Who controls the past now controls the future 11/06/2005 @ 10:51:10 AM
I should add that I will also quit if the Patriots win the Super Bowl again. I don't think you should mess with the teams. Having teams that don't pay attention is part of the Yahoo! FF experience.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - So's your face 11/06/2005 @ 11:17:00 AM
The packers would be the first team able to pick up t.o. off of waivers. (besides texans) freaky		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - How do you use these things? 11/06/2005 @ 01:16:19 PM
That was a nice catch, I'll give them that. I guess this was the spark the Vikings needed. Johnson and Culpepper are very different QBs. The announcers made the comment that Daunte would wait til a wr was open before he threw the ball whereas Brad just throws and the wr just has to know when to turn around to look for the ball. Stupid Lions.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	icbeast - 3619 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 02:59:27 PM
Bollinger has 2 TDs!!		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - 4671 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 03:10:49 PM
and he lost the game for them too		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - On your mark...get set...Terrible! 11/06/2005 @ 03:15:52 PM
how did Bollinger lose the game for them? He didn't fumble or throw an INT?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	icbeast - Who controls the past now controls the future 11/06/2005 @ 03:16:11 PM
I would've rather seen the Moss TD then listen to the pregame comments from these dorks.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 03:26:15 PM
in response to another Jeremy comment about the Packer opponents ending up with some weird injuries so that the Packers end up playing a team with less than their number 1 QB or something..........ReShard Lee 4th string RB.....oh yeah, no other injuries for the entire season for the Packers.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - So's your face 11/06/2005 @ 03:30:21 PM
1st and goal on the 1 or something and they 4 incomplete passes in a row or something. oh well only a fg it couldve been worse, put in henderson as rb.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings 11/06/2005 @ 03:33:53 PM
that was amazing		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - How do you use these things? 11/06/2005 @ 03:35:52 PM
i concur		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - Resident Tech Support 11/06/2005 @ 03:40:33 PM
ok, here's a rant: Favre said that his future may depend on whether or not Sherman returns. Well, here's what I have to say. It is worth it to me to say fairwell to Favre on a hall of fame career if it means that Mike Sherman gets banned from lambeau field for a period not exceeding 10 years. 1st and 5.....run for 2 yards.....2nd and 3....run for 1 yard.....3rd and 2.....run for less than a yard (all with a a 5th string rb!!!!) What the heck?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - 4671 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 03:43:45 PM
i hate our play calling		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	icbeast - 3619 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 03:48:07 PM
me too. that was dumb.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - 4671 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 03:51:14 PM
oh come on		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	icbeast - You've got to trust your instinct, and let go of regret 11/06/2005 @ 03:52:10 PM
the lady in the kfc commercial scares me. seriously.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - How do you use these things? 11/06/2005 @ 03:55:50 PM
really????????? 3 yards to go so we get 3 false starts and then favre fumbles the ball and so they run it back for a td???? that's how it goes down? worst possible scenario. how do we get screwed like that. damn *!Q&^$*#@^$		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - How do you use these things? 11/06/2005 @ 03:59:48 PM
rocket scientists can probably spend the extra four bucks on a frickin' meal. why does she work there? is she the secretary because she's the woman? stupid ass commercial, damn it i'm pissed off.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - On your mark...get set...Terrible! 11/06/2005 @ 04:08:43 PM
ok, Ben Rothlesberger isn't even playing and already they've mentioned his name more than Charlie Batch.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - 4671 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 04:15:12 PM
I thought he got the first down for the steelers myself.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Sarah - 4671 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 04:31:18 PM
longwell is officially off the packers as far as i'm concerned		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 04:36:18 PM
I will go on record to say that the single worst thing ever to happen to sports (other than free agency:)) is on the field reporting. What does a coach have to say after his team gave up 10 points on turnovers and are down 13-3 at halftime. Go away.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - Pie Racist 11/06/2005 @ 06:13:32 PM
In response to Scott: Your best day rushing was without Ahman and this 5th string guy you picked up did just as well as Ahman was doing (except without 2 fumbles) In response to Sarah: The reason Johnson throws to a reciever he knows will be open vs Daunte's wait for a player to come fre is because we switched offensive styles for the qb's. When Daunte is in we send guys way down field and hope they get open. Since Johnson can't "buy time" like Daunte they switched game plans to a quick timing route style offense (which we should have switched to since the day we traded Randy). and if I may: I didn't get to see a lot of the game but what I did saw Brett not being able to hit the broadside of a barn or throw a single pass that a wr didn't have to dive for. Also when you need 4 yards to keep the game alive and you can crawl for the 4 yards why throw a jump ball 40 yards down field?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it. 11/06/2005 @ 06:26:07 PM
all good questions, I'll just assume that Jeremy's comment to which I responded earlier was simply "to get a rise", because the Packers were definitely much more stung by injuries going into this game than the Packers were. Also, I agree with the last part of Jeremy's comment about Favre not really being on today. He seemed to be throwing at a lot of feet, over heads, off the finger tips, and the like. As far as the last 4th down play, I don't know why he didn't run. I wonder if maybe he has lost all confidence in his team/coaches in that he didn't think it would have been worth it to even if he did get a first down. I think he was afraid that if he got the first down, they would just run 3 times and get 5 yards.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 06:27:11 PM
"than the STEELERS were" not "Packers" The Packers were much more stung by injuries than the Steelers were.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - 9543 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 06:40:17 PM
Why don't they let Favre call the game himself, he has to knowthe offense better than anyone. At least go "Peyton Manning" and give him a couple plays to pick from. No, I'm not being sarcastic. A Team on their 3rd string QB is much worse off than a team on their 4/5th string running back. Jerome Bettis was on the sidelines too from what I saw. Also I don't think anyone here knows the Steelers line up well enough to claim they know anything about who they've lost. So while I think you could make an argument the Steelers were worse off it's a moot point because my original point was that it always seems the Packers play everyone's "b" team, which has really nothing to do with if the Packers start their 1st or 9th string team.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	icbeast - Who controls the past now controls the future 11/06/2005 @ 07:30:37 PM
Because Favre is not that good. His best seasons were when Holmgren had the offense under control and had Bret under control. His highlight reel is filled with plays were the play that was called didn't work and he made something happen. I'm not saying he doesn't know the offense, but he's no Peyton Manning. Plus the WRs and RBs probably only all know about 10 plays. Favre did suck it up today. If he doesn't start playing better, Rodgers at least needs to get some garbage time. The Vikings got to play Harrington instead of Garcia, plus Rogers didn't play and Roy and Jones were pretty banged up.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - 9543 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 07:42:50 PM
All but 2 teams got to play basically that same Lions team (including you)		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - 9543 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 07:43:16 PM
And you need to get on aim.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - Ombudsman 11/06/2005 @ 08:17:35 PM
Why does Jeremy keep trying to get us to switch brands of toothpaste. I think I'll stick with Aquafresh.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - Robots don't say 'ye' 11/06/2005 @ 08:22:38 PM
It took me a while to figure out what you were talking about. Funny.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	icbeast - 3619 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 10:44:21 PM
Other teams also got to play the Steelers with Rothlesburger out. Every team has injuries by this point of the season. Thats my point. No trivia this week? I prefer Mentadent myself.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - 3941 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 10:51:27 PM
I forgot to think of one this weekend, I'll get something up tonight or tomorrow.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - On your mark...get set...Terrible! 11/06/2005 @ 11:43:34 PM
The comment that the Packers play everyone's B team has to be one of the lamest things I have ever heard. It's as if you are making the claim that the Packers are the only team to ever play a team who is hurt. And at the same time, that assumption would only come close to making sense if and only if the Packers were at 100%, which they were not. And why are you only talking about Green? He's only the beginning of their injury list. And even though he wasn't having a great year anyway, he is still a valuable player for the Packers offense. I mean, the Packers have also lost Their backup running back, or their number 1 reciever, or their number 3 receiver, or a starting linebacker, or their starting center. And icbeast is right, Gado had been with the team since like Wednesday, so he basically knew only the running plays. I really can't take anything you say seriously anymore if you actually believe the things you talk about. Now please, start making smart comments about stuff that actually makes sense.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/06/2005 @ 11:45:12 PM
here's a trivia question: What two NFL teams combined forces and nicknames to become one team in 1943?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - Nutcan.com's MBL 11/06/2005 @ 11:47:53 PM
Week 9 Trivia Question: Electoral College List (in order) the Five U.S. Presidents who have received the most Electoral Votes for President. Bonus: Among all the candidates who never became President, name the man who received the most Electoral Votes for President. Double Bonus: Name the U.S. President to receive the fewest Electoral Votes for President. Note - These Questions all deal with the TOTAL number of votes the person received in their lifetime.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings 11/06/2005 @ 11:49:50 PM
one more thing then I'm done: By Jeremy's definition of "b" team: The Vikings beat the Packers' "b" team by 3 points on a 56 yard field goal. What does that say? In case you were wondering.....if being without Roethlesberger means the steelers were a "b" team, then the packers injury problems definitely qualifies.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - Ombudsman 11/06/2005 @ 11:55:23 PM
The Philadelphia Eagles and the Pittsburgh Steelers became the Phil-Pitt "Steagles"		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jon - 3443 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 07:57:25 AM
Maybe it was Dallas and Cincinnati. The Cowgals. It took me about an hour to think of that.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - The pig says "My wife is a slut?" 11/07/2005 @ 10:50:21 AM
First of all all I said was that it figures they get down to their 3rd string qb right before the packer game. That's it. Also again playing a teams "b" team has nothing to do with what status your team is at. If a boxer was scheduled to fight and lost a limb a week before the fight it would still be a break for him if the oppenent showed up with no legs or a hang nail. (Of course this fight wouldn't happen then but you get my meaning) I never said no other teams get to play b teams I just meant it seems the other teams lose their star(s) right before Packer week. Obviously it's just selective memory. (But just in case Vick and Dunn better watch their step this week) Also I though Matt was trying to make a joke about the Steagles, but that is actually the answer. Odd.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 11:11:03 AM
Duckett was already out this week, and Vick gets hurt every other day, so I'll just wait for the the week to come to hear the news I guess. Packriots, SeaLions, Fortyxans, etc. This is fun.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 11:13:37 AM
Is Clinton on that list of presidents with most Electoral Votes? I'll guess that FDR is number 1 on the list. I'll also guess that William Jennings Bryant is at the top for people who didn't win the presidency.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 11:15:27 AM
In this case, the Packers are the boxer with no legs and the Steelers simply had a sore foot.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 11:22:44 AM
A comment about something Jeremy and icbeast commented on earlier about letting Favre call his own plays. In Favre's prime, I saw a stat that he maybe audibled on average 2 or 3 times per game, while Marino did the same thing maybe 15-20 times per game. Favre's comment on that was that he a lot of confidence in the plays that were called and he trusted his ability to make pretty much any play work. So it may not be that he isn't good enough (in Super Bowl 31, both of Favre's TD passes of 54 and 81 yards were audibles), but that he puts a lot of confidence in his coaches judgement to pick plays, and a lot of confidence in his ability to execute those plays.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - 9543 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 12:10:20 PM
Would you rather have the players you have hurt or have most of them back and be forced to start Nall. (Maybe it's a bad time for this question)		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - Nutcan.com's MBL 11/07/2005 @ 12:21:21 PM
In response to Scott's 11:13am post: Clinton - Can't answer that. FDR - That's the easy one, now name the next four. W.J. Bryan - Is correct (I'll give credit for Bryant, since I have made that same mistake on his name before, as have a lot of people I imagine).		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	icbeast - Refactor Mercilessly 11/07/2005 @ 01:00:27 PM
Favre is the most important player on the offense, but I think Walker was a very close second. Combine that with Ferguson, Green, and Davenport and I'd take Nall in a heartbeat.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 01:06:46 PM
Is Reagan on the list of 5? Grover Cleveland has to be one, cuz he ran 3 times and won once. is Clinton not in the top 5?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on? 11/07/2005 @ 01:11:00 PM
Can Rodgers start over Nall? I almost wish it was possible to have a situation where if Favre decided to retire today that eveyone would magically be healed. That would be kind of cool, and would solidify many people's belief that Favre is some sort of diety.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 04:42:24 PM
here's another one. buccanaiders		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue. 11/07/2005 @ 04:59:20 PM
The NFL needs to ban cheerleaders; especially when they have sex in bar bathrooms, slap people waiting to use the bathroom, and then give police the ID of another cheerleader.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - 3941 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 05:41:01 PM
Seahawks + Broncos = Seahos		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - Washington Bureau Chief 11/07/2005 @ 05:45:14 PM
Clinton and Reagan are in the Top 5, Cleveland is not.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - 9543 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 06:44:30 PM
Well FDR has to be on there. Right?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - The pig says "My wife is a slut?" 11/07/2005 @ 06:49:44 PM
Washington received 69 electoral votes to win the first election unopposed		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 07:05:10 PM
I already got the FDR, Reagan and Clinton. We're trying to find the other 2		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - Resident Tech Support 11/07/2005 @ 07:09:56 PM
Nixon cheated, buy I think he should be up there. and then Eisenhower? and GWB had the lowest and 2nd lowest in over 100 or so years		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - Nutcan.com's MBL 11/07/2005 @ 08:44:37 PM
Ike and Nixon are the other two. FDR - 1876 votes Nixon - 1040 Reagan - 1015 Eisenhower - 899 Clinton - 749 From the Bonus Question: W.J. Bryan - 493 votes The Double Bonus Question is still open....and I will now TRIPLE the points.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 08:56:52 PM
is it John Adams?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - Washington Bureau Chief 11/07/2005 @ 09:13:20 PM
Not John Adams		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - I hate our freedoms 11/07/2005 @ 09:22:51 PM
I answered it already: It's Washington who received 69 electoral votes to win the first election unopposed		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - 3941 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 09:26:34 PM
It's not Washington		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - 9543 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 09:31:31 PM
So when you say "for president" you don't mean they ended up being president?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - Washington Bureau Chief 11/07/2005 @ 09:33:35 PM
I'm looking for fewest votes in a lifetime, not just one election, so the total for Washington would be 203. Either way though, it wouldnt be Washington as the real number is less than 69.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - Washington Bureau Chief 11/07/2005 @ 09:38:19 PM
I mean I'm looking for the man, who was a U.S. President, to recieve the fewest Electoral Votes for President in their lifetime. I say Electoral Votes for President, because votes are also cast for Vice-President but nobody cares about those.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - 9543 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 09:50:45 PM
Well John Tyler assumed the Presidency on the death of William Henry Harrison and did not run in the 1844 election. So he got 0 then.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - Nutcan.com's MBL 11/07/2005 @ 09:51:38 PM
Jeremy gets 1/3 credit with Tyler		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - 9543 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 09:53:49 PM
Same as: Andrew Johnson - Succeeded Abraham Lincoln, did not run in the 1868 election and Chester A. Arthur - Succeeded James Garfield, did not run in the 1884 election Fillmore looks like the fewest for a guy to be and run as president. He got 8.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - 3941 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 09:56:40 PM
Jeremy with Full Credit...and he stole my Bonus fact.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Matt - 3941 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 10:34:05 PM
I got another NFL "merger": The Chargers and the 49ers become the "Chargers"....oh, nevermind.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	icbeast - 3619 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 11:03:12 PM
Jigga what?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/07/2005 @ 11:28:53 PM
The Ramriots, The Patams, the Benets(could be French)(bengals/Jets), Steelers Panthers and Packers merge to form the Spankers....umm, well, steer clear of that one I guess.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/08/2005 @ 09:01:49 AM
just for the record: I got Clinton, FDR, and Reagan without looking at anything. My Nixon and Eisenhower answers were aided by google.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Micah - Bring down the Beast!!! 11/08/2005 @ 09:40:10 AM
The Electoral College is stupid		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - 6225 Posts 11/09/2005 @ 09:35:53 AM
TO and Rousenhaus have apologized to the NFL and the team. Now, when are they going to apologize to America for crappin' up the TV with the fricken TO saga for last 5 months?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on? 11/09/2005 @ 11:26:59 AM
do the Vikings and Packers schedules show up every other day?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	icbeast - But let history remember, that as free men, we chose to make it so! 11/09/2005 @ 07:08:20 PM
I've meant to post this about 5 times but I kept forgetting. Did I miss someone changing the rules of the English language? Over the weekend particularly I noticed a bunch of peeps on TV who apparently decided that adding ly at the ends of words isn't cool anymore. I remember one broadcaster say something like, "He's really running powerful right now." Shouldn't that be powerfully? I don't remember any of the other ones, but I know I heard the same lack of ly a couple of other times, and not all from the same guy.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - 9543 Posts 11/09/2005 @ 09:17:28 PM
When you log in you see the packers, as they are your favorite team.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - On your mark...get set...Terrible! 11/10/2005 @ 08:17:24 AM
oh, I see		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue. 11/10/2005 @ 08:19:23 AM
I don't know if anyone realized this, but good week for the brothers Pehler		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.