Link Stats
Added By: Jeremy
Added on: 08/18/2008 @ 12:17:41 PM
Link View Count: 925
Science
Science
Rate this Link
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.

Sprinkler Rainbow Conspiracy



I'm willing to concede that perhaps there is something contaminating her water supply. Do we have a "constitutional right" to water anyway?


View External Link [www.youtube.com]
Back to Link List
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - I believe virtually everything I read.
08/18/2008 @ 12:27:47 PM
  Quote this comment
Not to mention, what could this have to do with the Government's "thrist [sic] for energy?"
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
flower .jpgPackOne - You analyze me. Tend to despise me. You laugh when I stumble and fall.
08/18/2008 @ 02:42:08 PM
  Quote this comment
Is that Roseanne?
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
fry6beeu9.jpgJeremy - 9594 Posts
08/18/2008 @ 02:46:08 PM
  Quote this comment
Ha, they do sound similar. I wonder what this woman thinks rainbows are in the sky when it's raining, and why she doesn't make the connection. Or, for that matter, why they are called rainbows.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Jeremy perfected this at 08/18/2008 2:46:14 pm
face.bmpCarlos44ec - A Vote for me is a Vote against Terrorism! ...or atleast just wasted.
08/18/2008 @ 03:48:30 PM
  Quote this comment
"What is oozing out of..." her head. Oh, that's just them smarts.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
scott.jpgScott - 6225 Posts
08/19/2008 @ 09:23:38 PM
  Quote this comment
She says of a rainbow: "this cannot be natural!"

Also, what "constitutional rights" is she even referring to?
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
images.jpgcraig - 12521 Posts
08/19/2008 @ 10:12:11 PM
  Quote this comment
Scott Wrote - Today @ 09:23:38 PM
She says of a rainbow: "this cannot be natural!"

Also, what "constitutional rights" is she even referring to?


I believe she is referring to the Ninth Amendment, which states "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

Which I, in my role of amateur lawyer and general know-it-all, take to mean that all rights not specifically mentioned as belonging to the government, are retained by the people. Which, unless I missed the part of the constitution where they government claimed the right to 'manipulate near ground level rainbows as required for the defense of the nation', and to be fair I didn't really look that hard, would mean that the right to 'rainbow free sprinklers' would still rest with we the people. I assume similar logic would apply to 'non-oozing ground', and the right to 'things that are natural'. The legal interpretation of this amendment is a bit hazy though. However, I fully expect that is particular case will go all the way to the supreme court (Crazy Lady vs. Rainbows, Sprinklers, Ooze, et al).
Rate this comment
Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.
craig screwed with this at 08/19/2008 10:28:58 pm
vignette.bmpCarlos44ec - A Vote for me is a Vote against Terrorism! ...or atleast just wasted.
08/20/2008 @ 07:56:40 AM
  Quote this comment
Maybe the military is testing it's new anti- anti-missile laser shield?

http://www.space.com/news/laser_weapon_000607_wg.html
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
2887.gifAlex - Who controls the past now controls the future
08/20/2008 @ 09:05:13 PM
  Quote this comment
"What the hell is going on?" indeed. I love the sirens in the background.
Rate this comment
Yours:

Rated 0 times.
Leave a Comment of your very own
Name:
Comment:
Verify this code
Verify the Code in this box, or sign in, to post a comment.
click me!
There's an emoticon for how you feel!
click me!
My Files
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.