Sprinkler Rainbow Conspiracy

Link Stats

Added By: Jeremy

Added on: 08/18/2008 @ 12:17:41 PM

Link View Count: 871

Science
All Categories >> Science

Rate this Link

Yours:

Total:

Rated 1 times.

Sprinkler Rainbow Conspiracy

I'm willing to concede that perhaps there is something contaminating her water supply. Do we have a "constitutional right" to water anyway?

View External Link [www.youtube.com]
Back to Link List

	Jeremy - Robots don't say 'ye' 08/18/2008 @ 12:27:47 PM
Not to mention, what could this have to do with the Government's "thrist [sic] for energy?"		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	PackOne - That hypocrite smokes two packs a day. 08/18/2008 @ 02:42:08 PM
Is that Roseanne?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Jeremy - Super Chocolate Bear 08/18/2008 @ 02:46:08 PM
Ha, they do sound similar. I wonder what this woman thinks rainbows are in the sky when it's raining, and why she doesn't make the connection. Or, for that matter, why they are called rainbows.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.
Jeremy edited this at 08/18/2008 2:46:14 pm

	Carlos44ec - "Always remember that you are unique. Just like everybody else." 08/18/2008 @ 03:48:30 PM
"What is oozing out of..." her head. Oh, that's just them smarts.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Scott - Get Up! Get outta here! Gone! 08/19/2008 @ 09:23:38 PM
She says of a rainbow: "this cannot be natural!" Also, what "constitutional rights" is she even referring to?		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	craig - 132 Posts 08/19/2008 @ 10:12:11 PM
Scott Wrote - Today @ 09:23:38 PM She says of a rainbow: "this cannot be natural!" Also, what "constitutional rights" is she even referring to? I believe she is referring to the Ninth Amendment, which states "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Which I, in my role of amateur lawyer and general know-it-all, take to mean that all rights not specifically mentioned as belonging to the government, are retained by the people. Which, unless I missed the part of the constitution where they government claimed the right to 'manipulate near ground level rainbows as required for the defense of the nation', and to be fair I didn't really look that hard, would mean that the right to 'rainbow free sprinklers' would still rest with we the people. I assume similar logic would apply to 'non-oozing ground', and the right to 'things that are natural'. The legal interpretation of this amendment is a bit hazy though. However, I fully expect that is particular case will go all the way to the supreme court (Crazy Lady vs. Rainbows, Sprinklers, Ooze, et al).		Rate this comment Yours: Total: Rated 1 times.
craig messed with this at 08/19/2008 10:28:58 pm

	Carlos44ec - 2079 Posts 08/20/2008 @ 07:56:40 AM
Maybe the military is testing it's new anti- anti-missile laser shield? http://www.space.com/news/laser_weapon_000607_wg.html		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.

	Alex - 3619 Posts 08/20/2008 @ 09:05:13 PM
"What the hell is going on?" indeed. I love the sirens in the background.		Rate this comment Yours: Rated 0 times.